* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:05] I'M CALLING THIS SPEAKER [CALL TO ORDER] AT 2:32 PM ON THURSDAY, JULY 23RD, 2026. THIS IS AN IN-PERSON MEETING TAKING PLACE IN THE CITY HALL ANNEX AT 900 BAGBY. YOU MAY ALSO MONITOR THE MEETING BY VIEWING, UH, VIA HTV SPEAKERS. IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON AN ITEM, PLEASE FILL OUT THE SPEAKER'S FORM BEFORE THE ITEM IS CALLED AND TURN IT INTO STAFF NEAR THE FRONT DOOR. CONSENT AND REPEAT SPEAKERS ARE ALLOWED FOR ONE MINUTE. NEW SPEAKERS ARE TIME FOR TWO MINUTES. SPEAKER RULES ARE FOUND ON THE TOP PORTION OF THE SPEAKERS SIGN IN FORM ATTACHED TO THE AGENDA. COUNCIL MEMBERS SPEAKING ON AN ITEM ARE NOT TIMED. APPLICANTS HAVE THEIR ALLOTTED TWO TIME, TWO MINUTES TIME, AS WELL AS REBUTTALS. NON APPLICANTS AND GENERAL SPEAKERS ARE ALLOWED. TWO MINUTES TIME. THERE IS NOT AN OPTION FOR REBUTTAL. EVEN IF YOU DID NOT USE YOUR FULL TWO MINUTES, YOU WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK AGAIN AND TIME CANNOT BE ALLOTTED TO ANOTHER SPEAKER. TO ESTABLISH A QUORUM OF 11 MEMBERS, I'LL CALL THE ROLE CHAIR CLARK IS PRESENT. VICE CHAIR GARZA PRESENT. COMMISSIONER CARROLL PRESENT, COMMISSIONER BALLARD PRESENT. COMMISSIONER HINES PRESENT. COMMISSIONER JONES PRESENT. COMMISSIONER MAREZ PRESENT. COMMISSIONER NARANJO PRESENT. COMMISSIONER PIERCE PRESENT, COMMISSIONER POROUS PERLE PRESENT. COMMISSIONER SHEPHERD PRESENT. COMMISSIONER SIEGLER PRESENT. COMMISSIONER SYKES PRESENT AND, UM, COMMISSIONER MONKA PRESENT AND SECRETARY VON TRAN. PRESENT. 15. GET EVERYBODY? YES. SO WE HAVE 15 MEMBERS PRESENT, SO WE DO HAVE A QUORUM. OH, I WANNA LET EVERYONE KNOW WE HAVE TWO ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN WITHDRAWN, SO WE WILL NOT HEAR ANYTHING ON THESE ITEMS AND WILL TAKE NO ACTION. THE FIRST ONE IS ITEM 38 WEST HAVEN MANOR, NORTH SECTION TWO AND 98 BRIDGELAND CREEK, CREEK, LAND VILLAGE, GP. AND NOW [Director’s Report ] I'LL CALL FOR THE DIRECTOR'S REPORT. DIRECTOR TRAN. GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIR CLARK COMMISSION MEMBERS, STAFF, AND THE PUBLIC. I AM VON TRAN, SECRETARY OF THIS COMMISSION AND DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. WELCOME. I HAVE ONLY ONE ANNOUNCEMENT TODAY ON JULY 15TH, CITY COUNCIL APPROVED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 42, DIVISION SEVEN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE. I WOULD LIKE TO THANK DIRECTOR ALLEN OF THE PARKS DEPARTMENT AS WELL AS OUR LEGAL TEAM LED BY TAMMY KIM, UH, FOR THEIR EFFORTS. IN ADDITION TO MY STAFF, UH, YOU GUYS ARE AMAZING. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE SUPPORT, MY ENTIRE TEAM AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND MORE SO I WOULD LIKE TO EXTEND OUR APPRECIATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR SUPPORTING THIS ITEM TO FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL. WITH THAT, IN CLOSING, FOR ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT 8 3 2 3 9 3 9 3 6 6 0 0. TO REACH THE PLANNER OF THE DAY, PLEASE CALL 8 3 2 3 9 3 6 6 2 4. YOU MAY VISIT US ONLINE@HOUSTONPLANNING.COM. THIS CONCLUDES MY REPORT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU DIRECTOR TRAN COMMISSIONERS [Consideration of July 9, 2026, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes ] OUR, UH, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 9TH, 2026. WERE POSTED ON THE AGENDA. DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? MOTION GARZA. MOTION GARZA. SECOND BALLARD. SECOND BALLARD. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. [Platting Activities a & b] MOVING ON TO ROMAN NUMER ONE SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS DEIDRE VAN LAGAN FROM HOUSTON PUBLIC WORKS AND I'M HERE TO PRESENT THE JULY, 2026 SEMI-ANNUAL WATER AND WASTEWATER REPORT TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 3 9 5, TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED ORDINANCES TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES TO ADMINISTER THE CITY'S IMPACT FEES PROGRAMS. APPROVAL OF MOTION 90 DASH SIX FOUR BY CITY COUNCIL APPOINTED THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. THIS REPORT DOCUMENTS CHANGES THAT OCCUR BETWEEN THE PERIOD OF NOVEMBER 30TH, 2025 AND APRIL 30TH, 2026 OF [00:05:01] THE 20 20 20 30 IMPACT FEES PROGRAMS. IN SUMMARY OF THE SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT, I OFFER THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, A TOTAL OF $18,370,883 AND 16 CENTS WAS GENERATED FROM REVENUES AND INTEREST FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES ACCRUED IN THE IMPACT FEES ACCOUNTS BETWEEN NOVEMBER 30TH, 2025 AND APRIL 30TH, 2026. THE SECOND HALF OF THE SIXTH YEAR OF THE 20 20, 20 30 IMPACT FEES PROGRAMS, THE CURRENT WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE OF $4,286 AND 93 CENTS PER SERVICE UNIT FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER IS 39.47% OF THE MAXIMUM FEES ALLOWED BY CURRENT LAW. THE WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES IN EFFECT FOR THIS REPORTING PERIOD HAVE BEEN IN EFFECT SINCE JULY 1ST, 2025 WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2020 AND 20 20 20 THROUGH 2030 IMPACT FEE PROGRAM ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL. THE NUMBER OF S SERVICE UNITS THAT GENERATED THE $18,370,883 AND 16 CENTS WAS 4,075 SERVICE UNITS FOR WATER AND 3,981 SERVICE UNITS FOR WASTEWATER. A TOTAL OF 475 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WERE EXEMPT FROM PAYING IMPACT FEES AND WERE GRANTED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE BELOW THE MEDIAN HOUSING PRICE DURING THIS PERIOD. EXAMINATION OF DATA REGARDING SERVICE UNIT CONSUMPTION FROM NOVEMBER 30TH, 2025 THROUGH APRIL 30TH, 2026 INDICATES SIGNIFICANT CAPACITY REMAINS IN THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS TO SUPPORT THE ANTICIPATED DEMAND THROUGH OCTOBER 31ST, 2026, THE END OF THE NEXT REPORTING PERIOD. BASED ON THESE FINDINGS, I RECOMMEND THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTING AS THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION TO DEBT RETIREMENT FOR THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF REVENUES AND INTEREST GENERATED FROM WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD AND THE SUM OF $18,370,883 AND 16 CENTS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. I NOW MAKE MYSELF AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER MAREZ? YEAH, JUST GONNA HAVE A STATEMENT. SO WE REVIEWED, UH, THE IMPACT FEE REPORTS AND WE RECOMMEND APPROVING THE TRANSFERS. A COUPLE ITEMS TO NOTE ON THE WATER WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES 475 HOMES WERE EXEMPTED FROM THE IMPACT FEES SINCE THEY FELL BELOW THE MEDIUM HOUSING PRICE. UM, AND SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE IMPACT FEE PROGRAM, THE CITY HAS COLLECTED APPROXIMATELY 713 MILLION IN WATER WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES, WHICH AS OUR SPEAKER NOTED, IS ONLY ABOUT 39% OF THE MAXIMUM POSSIBLE, UM, IMPACT FEES AVAILABLE. UM, SO BASED ON THAT REVIEW, I RECOMMEND THAT AS THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WE APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO DEBT SERVICES AS NOTED IN THE IMPACT FEE REPORT. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER MAREZ. SO THAT'S A MOTION. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND GARZA SECOND GARZA. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. MOVING ON TO ROMAN TWO SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON DRAINAGE IMPACT FEES. IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 3 9 5, TEXAS LITTLE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED IT, ADOPTED ORDINANCES TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES TO ADMINISTER THE CITY'S IMPACT FEES PROGRAMS. APPROVAL OF MOTION 90 DASH SIX 14 BY CITY COUNCIL APPOINTED THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS THE CAPITAL ADVISORY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. THIS REPORT DOCUMENTS CHANGES THAT OCCUR BETWEEN PERIODS THE PERIOD OF NOVEMBER 30TH, 2025 AND APRIL 30TH, 2026 OF THE DRAINAGE IMPACT FEE PROGRAM. IN SUMMARY OF THE SEMI REPORT, I OFFER THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, A TOTAL OF $547,827 AND 65 CENTS IN DRAINAGE. IMPACT FEES WERE PURCHASED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 30TH, 2025 AND APRIL 30TH, 2026. A TOTAL OF $8,771,274 AND 25 CENTS WAS PURCHASED SINCE PROGRAM INCEPTION. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND I NOW MAKE MYSELF AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? OKAY. HEARING NONE. DO I HAVE A MOTION? YES. COMMISSIONER MAREZ? YES. UM, BASED ON OUR REVIEW, I RECOMMEND THAT I HAVE THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE. WE APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CAPITAL PROJECTS. THANK YOU. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND JONES. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU SO MUCH. OKAY, MOVING ON TO ROMAN NUMBER THREE, PLATTING ACT ACTIVITY SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT PLATS. GOOD AFTERNOON MADAM. MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. [00:10:01] MY NAME IS MAXIMUS GARZA. UH, SECTIONS A AND B ARE PRESENTED AS ONE GROUP, WHICH INCLUDES THE CONSENT AND REPL ITEMS NOT REQUIRING NOTIFICATION. SECTIONS A AND B ARE ITEMS ONE THROUGH 80 SECTION A. CONSENT ITEMS ARE NUMBERS ONE THROUGH 39 AND SECTION B REPL ITEMS ARE NUMBERS 40 THROUGH 80. NO ITEMS NEED TO BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER AND THERE ARE NO CHANGES OF STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. MADAM CHAIR, IF THERE ARE ANY, IF THERE ARE NO INDIVIDUALS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THESE ITEMS, THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUESTS THE APPROVAL OF ALL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSENT AND REPLAY ITEMS NOT REQUIRING NOTIFICATION. THANK YOU. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THESE ITEMS. THERE'S ANY, IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO? OKAY. I KNOW I HAVE SOME ABSTENTIONS. COMMISSIONER MAREZ? YES. AND SECTION A I WE RECUSED FROM ONE AND THREE AND SECTION BI RECUSED FROM ITEM 43 AND 80. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER PIERCE? UH, YES. MADAM CHAIR, I'D LIKE TO RECUSE MYSELF FROM ITEM NUMBER THREE. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER SHEPHERD? YES. UM, FOR SECTION A, UM, NUMBER ONE FOR B, UM, 43, 55, 68, 71, AND 72. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER, UH, RECUSALS? OKAY. HEARING NONE. I NEED A MOTION. SAVE AND ACCEPT ITEMS 1, 3 43 55, 1 72 AND 80. DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION? MOTION SYKES AND FOUR DID I? 1 3 4 43. ONE THREE. I DON'T HAVE ANYBODY FOR FOUR. DID WE NOT SAY FOUR? APOLOGIES BY MISTAKE. NO WORRIES. GLAD IT WAS YOUR MISTAKE, NOT MINE. YEAH. UM, . SO DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION SYKES. MOTION SYKES. SECOND PIERCE. SECOND PIERCE. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. NOW WE'LL HAVE A MOTION FOR ITEMS 1, 3 43 55, 68, 71, 72, AND 80. MOTION POROUS PERLE. MOTION POROUS PERLE. SECOND SIGLER. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. [c. Replats requiring Public Hearings with Notification (John Cedillo, Ken Calhoun, Aracely Rodriguez, and Dorianne Powe-Phlegm) ] MOVING ON TO C, PUBLIC HEARINGS. GOOD AFTERNOON MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS JOHN PHILLIPS . ITEM 81 IS ALBERRY RESIDENCE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS AN OVER 8,500 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CITY LIMITS AT THE SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF CULLUM BOULEVARD AND AEN BERRY LANE NORTH OF OLD SPANISH TRAIL. THE REASON FOR REPL IS TO CREATE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A VARIANCE TO NOT DEDICATE FIVE FEET OF WIDENING TO ACON BERRY LANE. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST AND ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET. THIS IS A RE PLAT OF LOT 14 BLOCK ONE OF THE RIVERSIDE TERRACE ANNEX REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THE PROPOSED PLAT DOES NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY. THE PLAT WAS DEFERRED LAST CYCLE PER APPLICANT REQUEST TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDINANCE AND THE DEED RESTRICTED BILLING LINES AND THOSE REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET. THERE ARE TWO MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS ALONG ALBERRY OUTLINED IN PINK, UH, WHICH HAVE CREATED FOUR UNIT MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS ON EACH, UH, ON EACH OF TWO LOTS. THE DEVELOPMENTS HAVE INCURRED THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE WIDENING TO PROVIDE 60 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY, UH, REQUIRED BY THE ORDINANCE. THE DEVELOPMENTS FALL WITHIN THE SAME SCOPE AS AN MUR RESERVE AND COULD POTENTIALLY MEET THE MUR REQUIREMENTS, UH, WHICH COULD WOULD ONLY CALL FOR A 50 FOOT WIDE RIDE OF WAY. UH, THAT AND THE CUL-DE-SAC OF ALBERRY IS ONLY 320 FEET LONG, MAKING THE WIDENING INFEASIBLE AS IT WOULD ONLY DECREASE LOT SIZE WITHOUT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVING RIDE OF WAY. UH, TRAFFIC CIRCULATION OR ACCESS. STAFF HAS RECEIVED ADVANCED COMMENTS REGARDING THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUEST OF VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CBC 1 0 1 FOREIGN CONDITIONS. MA'AM, CHAIR PLEASE. THE COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME FOR THIS. OKAY, THANK YOU. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON ITEM 81. OH, LET ME OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 81. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO? NO. OKAY. HEARING NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION HINES. MOTION HINES. SECOND. SECOND MADS. ALL IN FAVOR? A OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MOVING ON TO ITEM 82. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS KEN CALHOUN. ITEM 82 IS BAYOU WOOD, SECTION TWO, PARTIAL REPL NUMBER THREE AND EXTENSION. THIS APPLICATION WAS DEFERRED LAST CYCLE TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TIME TO COORDINATE WITH LEGAL REGARDING DEED RESTRICTIONS. THE SUBJECTS SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS, SOUTH SOUTHWEST ALONG RIS CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC. THE PURPOSE OF THE REPLAY TO CREATE [00:15:01] ONE SINGLE FAMILY LOT. THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION, UH, REQUIREMENTS. UH, REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THE PLAT WILL NO LONGER VIOLATE SEPARATELY FILE D RESTRICTIONS. SO STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. MADAM CHAIR, PLEASE COMMISSION. YOU MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 82 IS CONTINUED. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'LL CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION. MOTION JONES. SECOND. SECOND NARANJO. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. ITEM 83. ITEM 83 IS KAYWOOD PARK REFL NUMBER ONE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS NUMBER 30 32,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CITY LIMITS WEST ALONG CAWOOD AVENUE NORTH OF WESTVIEW DRIVE AND EAST OF ANTOINE DRIVE. THE REASON FOR PLT IS TO REALIGN THE THREE FOOT EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT AND PACE WITH THE, UH, 10 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT. THERE ARE NO VARIANCE OF REQUESTED WITH THIS APPLICATION AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. THIS IS A FULL REPLAT OF CAWOOD PARK AND REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THE PLAT DOES NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY. UH, STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS REGARDING THE APPLICATION. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CCC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. MADAM CHAIR, PLEASE THE COMMISSION. YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 83 IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION GARZA. MOTION GARZA. SECOND CAROL. SECOND CAROL. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES ITEM 84. ITEM 84 IS EAST END ON THE BAYOU TRAILS. THE SUBJECT SIDE IS A NEARLY 36,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CITY LIMITS AT THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF NAGEL STREET AND FREUD STREET NORTH OF NAVIGATION AND EAST OF JENSEN ROAD. THE REASON FOR REPL IS TO CREATE 23 LOTS AND THREE RESERVES AS PART OF A SHARED DRIVEWAY SUBDIVISION. THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUEST FOR THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS. UH, THIS IS A PLT OF UNRESTRICTED RESERVE SEA IN BLOCK ONE OF THE EAST AND, UM, BAYOU SECTION THREE. PLT NUMBER ONE AND EXTENSION REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THE PLAT DOES NOT VIOLATE ANY PROPOSED, UH, DOES NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACEBOOK PLAT OR THOSE FILES SEPARATELY AS STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS APPLICATION. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CCPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. MADAM CHAIR, PLEASE THE COMMISSION. YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 84 IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION. MOTION MAR. SECOND. SECOND NARANJO. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES ITEM 85. ITEM 85 IS FISHER'S POINT AT WAVERLY PARTIAL REPL NUMBER ONE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS NEARLY 8,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CITY LIMITS EAST ALONG WAVERLY STREET, WEST OF YALE STREET AND NORTH OF 11TH STREET. THE REASON FOR REPL IS TO CREATE ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT. THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM. THIS IS A REPLAT OF LOT 21 OF BLOCK 180 1 OUT OF HOUSTON HEIGHTS AND A REPLAT OF LOT TWO BLOCK ONE OUT OF FISHER'S. POINT OF WAVERLEY STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS APPLICATION. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THE PLAT FOR TWO WEEKS PER APPLICANT REQUEST TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY WITH NOTICE REQUIREMENTS. MADAM CHAIR, PLEASE THE COMMISSION. YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 85 IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK IS NEW. ONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE. I'LL CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION. MOTION POURS PER SECOND GARZA SECOND GARZA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 86. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS ARACELI RODRIGUEZ. ITEM 86 WINDWOOD VIEWS. THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT WEST OF MEA DRIVE AND SOUTH OF TWELL ROAD. THE PURPOSE OF THE IS TO CREATE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS. NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THE PLOT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTION ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILES SEPARATELY. STAFF DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT IN ADVANCE. THAT RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBSTITUTE. THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITION. MADAM CHAIR IS TO PLEASE THE COMMISSION. YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 86 IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION SER. MOTION SIGLER SECOND MAD. [00:20:01] SECOND MADS I'LL IN IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES ITEM 87. ITEM 87, GREENWOOD VILLAS. THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT WEST OF MEA DRIVE AND SOUTH OF TEWELL ROAD. THE PURPOSE OF THE WEEP THAT IS TO CREATE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LODGE. NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. STAFF DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. IN EVENT STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THE PLOT TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE APPLICANT TO CONTINUE COORDINATING WITH THE URBAN STREET. MADAM CHAIR IS TO APPRECIATE THE COMMISSION. YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 87 IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'LL CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION JONES. MOTION JONES. SECOND PSYCHS. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. ITEM 88. ITEM 88, GO. ULTIMATE WEST VIEW, THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT EAST OF WEST WAYSIDE DRIVE AND SOUTH OF KEWELL ROAD. THE PURPOSE OF THE WELA IS TO CREATE ONE UNRESTRICTED RESERVE. NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THE PLOT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTION ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY THAT WE SEE SOME PUBLIC COMMENT IN ADVANCE VOICING CONCERN REGARDING TO THE PROPOSED USE PROPERTY VALUE, TRAFFIC SPEEDING AND NOISE. SO THAT RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLUS SUBSTITUTE, THE CCPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITION. MADAM CHAIR IS TO PLEASE THE COMMISSION. YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 88 IS OPEN. I DO HAVE A COUPLE OF SPEAKERS. OUR FIRST SPEAKER IS ROBERT STEVENS. GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD AFTERNOON. HELLO COMMISSION. THANK YOU FOR, UH, GIVING ME AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK HERE. I'M ROBERT STEVENS. I'M A LANDOWNER AT 7 85 10 WOODVINE PLACE COURT, WHICH IS, UH, NEARBY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. UM, I AM CONCERNED THAT THE REPL IS GOING TO BE, UM, MERGING TOGETHER SEVERAL DIFFERENT, UM, TRACKS AND SOME MIGHT BE SUBJECT TO DEED RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE GONNA BE KIND OF WASHED AWAY IN THE PROCESS HERE. DEED RESTRICTIONS THAT MIGHT PREVENT A POTENTIALLY NOISY AND TROUBLESOME DEVELOPMENT IN A RESIDE RESIDENTIAL AREA. SO I'M ASKING FOR SOME TIME. I I TRIED TO LOOK AT THE DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DON'T THINK THEY'RE, UM, AVAILABLE ONLINE. I THINK WE HAVE TO GO DOWN TO MICRO FISH. IT, IT'S JUST TAKING LONGER. I WOULD LIKE TIME TO LOOK AT THIS AND MAKE SURE WE'RE NOT MAKING A MISTAKE HERE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS DOUG LESSARD. GOOD AFTERNOON, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. UH, I UM, MY NAME IS DOUGLAS ARD. I'M A NEIGHBOR, UM, IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. I LIVE JUST WEST OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN ASTON PARK, WHICH IS A COMMUNITY OF 11 HOMES THAT'S GATED. I OPPOSE THE REZONING OF THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS TO, UM, UNRESTRICTED, UM, UH, RESERVE. UM, I ALSO OPPOSE THE PROJECT. I THINK IT'S TOO BIG. UM, THIS IS PRIMARILY A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S A REALLY NICE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT HAS TRANSFORMED IN THE LAST 11 YEARS SINCE I'VE LIVED THERE. UH, THERE'S BEEN HOMES IN THE AREA THAT HAVE BEEN, THAT WERE RUN DOWN, THAT WERE DEMOLISHED AND THEY SPLIT THE LOT IN TWO. THEY'VE CREATED TWO HOMES. AND REALLY I THINK IN THE INTEREST OF GROWTH HERE, THERE, THERE SHOULD BE ANYTHING THAT'S ZONED RESIDENTIAL SHOULD STAY AS RESIDENTIAL 'CAUSE THERE IS NEED FOR HOUSING THAT IS AFFORDABLE AND IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE CITY. UM, AND IT'S A VERY WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE'S THREE BIG CHURCHES THAT I CAN WALK TO. THERE'S THREE, UH, PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN THE AREA. THERE'S PARKS. UM, IT'S REALLY A BEAUTIFUL AREA. I'D HATE FOR IT TO, TO BE RUN TO, UM, TO BE RUN DOWN WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT. UM, THE PROJECT IS A LARGE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR STORAGE OF SPORTS CARS. IT'S GONNA BE SET UP AS CONDOMINIUMS SOLD AT 600,000 A PIECE. I'D RATHER SEE RESIDENTIAL IN THAT AREA AT 600,000 A PIECE. UM, THIS IS REALLY PRIMARILY A RESIDENTIAL AREA. SO, UM, I, UM, I THINK THAT COVERS WHAT I NEED TO SAY, BUT AGAIN, I I OPPOSE THE REZONING. I OPPOSED THE, THE PROJECT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. [00:25:01] THANKS FOR COMING IN TODAY. I HAVE NO ONE ELSE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WISHES TO OKAY. HEARING NONE. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I'M GONNA ASK YOU MS. RODRIGUEZ, UH, THE MENTION OF DEED RESTRICTIONS. DID, DID, UM, DOES THIS VIOLATE DEED RESTRICTIONS? IT WILL REVIEW BY LEGAL AND THE, IT DOESN'T VIOLATE ANY KNOWN APPLICABLE RESTRICTION. OKAY. THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS, IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. YES, COMMISSIONER GARZA. SO MR. RODRIGUEZ, UH, THIS IS GONNA BE AN UNRESTRICTED RESERVE. WHAT WAS IT BEFORE? IT'S AN UNRESTRICTED RESERVE AND, UH, PER THE APPLICANT AND THEY'RE PLANNING TO DO A STORAGE FACILITY YES. FOR CARS. BUT WAS IT A, A RESERVE FOR A COMMERCIAL BEFORE THIS REQUEST? YES. SO THE CORNER PROPERTY IS AN UNRESTRICTED RESERVE RIGHT NOW AND THEY JUST ADDING THE, THE NORTHERN PROPERTY TO NORTHERN LOT YEAH. TO EXPAND IT. OKAY, SO IT'S ALREADY COMMERCIAL OR UNRESTRICTED. THE WHITE CORNER IS ALREADY, UH, UNRESTRICTED ASSURE. ALRIGHT, THANK YOU. YEAH, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YES. I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND THAT THE, THE TWO LOTS TO THE NORTH, THOSE ARE NOT COMMISSIONER RESIDENTIAL? YEAH. CAN YOU REPEAT THE QUESTION? THE, THE, THE TWO NORTHERN PIECES, ARE THOSE DEED RESTRICTED TO RESIDENTIAL OR ARE THEY NO COMMERCIAL AS WELL? WELL IT COULD BE USED FOR ANYTHING THEY WANT. IT'S NOT RESTRICTED TO RESIDENTIAL ON FACE OF THE PLOT. SO THEY COULD BE USED FOR ANY USE AS LONG AS WITHIN THE, THE BOUNDARY. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? ANYONE ELSE? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, SO I CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MM-HMM UM, SO WE HAVE BEFORE US A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION GARZA. MOTION GARZA. SECOND HINES. SECOND HINES. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. MOVING ON TO 89. ITEM 89, ABIBA STATES AS SNOWDEN STREET. THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT EAST OF WAYSIDE DRIVE AND SOUTH OF TWELL ROAD. THE PURPOSE OF THE WE FLAT IS TO CREATE THREE SINGLE FAMILY LOT AND NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED. WITH THIS ITEM, THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT AND THE STAFF RECEIVED A CALL FROM THE CLEARMONT PLACE CITY ORGANIZATION INDICATING THAT THE PLOT IS SUBJECT TO THE DE RESTRICTED BORDERLINE REQUIREMENT. THE RESTRICTION HAD BEEN FORWARDED TO LEGAL FOR FURTHER REVIEW. SO THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO THE FURTHER PLOT FOR FURTHER DE RESTRICTION REVIEW. MADAM CHAIR IS THE PLEASE OF THE COMMISSION. YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 89 IS OPEN. I DO HAVE A COUPLE OF SPEAKERS. OUR FIRST SPEAKER IS VICKI MARTIN. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. UH, I SIT ON THE BOARD WITH THE CLAREMONT PLACE CIVIC ORGANIZATION AND I ALSO SERVE ON THE BOARD WITH THE SUPER NEIGHBORHOOD AND BASICALLY THE PROPERTY, THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IS 75 YEARS OLD THIS YEAR AND THE PROPERTIES ON THE STREET HAVE A SETBACK LINE OF 25 FEET. AND TO MY UNDERSTANDING, WE HAVE NOT BEEN GIVEN ANY RENDERINGS OR ELEVATIONS, BUT IT APPEARS AS THOUGH THE DEVELOPER WISHES TO BE 10 STREET 10 FEET FROM THE UH, FRONTAL STREET. SO WE ARE OPPOSED TO THAT, BUT WE ARE OPEN TO SEE THE RENDERINGS OR THE ELEVATIONS SO THAT WE CAN HAVE FURTHER COMMUNICATIONS. BUT I UNDERSTAND IT'S DEFERRED TO GO TO LEGAL FOR OUR D RESTRICTIONS AND I'LL BE WELCOME BACK TO COME WHEN IT'S BACK ON THE SCHEDULE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. WE'LL SEE YOU IN TWO WEEKS. OUR NEXT SPEAKER, JUAN CASTILLO, YOU, YOU'RE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU WANTED TO SPEAK ABOUT? GOOD AFTERNOON PLANNING COMMISSION. UM, FIRST THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK. I REALLY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING. I, UM, WE DID EXTENSIVE RESEARCH ON THIS PROPERTY. WE DIDN'T FIND ANY LEGAL DIS UH, RESTRICTIONS, UH, TIED TO THIS PROPERTY. SO I WOULD REALLY LIKE TO LOOK AT THE RESTRICTIONS THAT SHE MENTIONED EARLIER. UM, OUR ABSTRACTER DIDN'T FIND ANYTHING. OUR TITLE COMPANY DIDN'T FIND ANYTHING. THERE ARE SOME DEED RESTRICTIONS TIED TO CERTAIN LOTS IN THIS, UH, IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. HOWEVER, WE COULDN'T LOCATE ANYTHING FOR THIS PARTICULAR LOT. OKAY. UM, MS. MARTIN, MAYBE YOU CAN GET WITH THE APPLICANT HERE. I'D APPRECIATE THAT. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I HAVE NO ONE ELSE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. IS THERE ANY ONE ELSE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'M GOING TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF DEFERRAL. MOTION. MAD. MOTION? MAD. SECOND. SECOND BALLARD. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 90. [00:30:07] GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS DORIAN FLM. ITEM 90 IS LAUREL PLACE RESERVES. THE SITE IS IN HOUSTON, EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS SOUTH ALONG WILL CLAYTON PARKWAY AND NORTH ALONG ATAS CA CEDAR ROAD. THE REASON FOR REPLY IS TO CREATE TWO RESERVES RESTRICTED TO RECREATION AND LANDSCAPE USE AND ONE OPEN SPACE RESERVE. THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM. REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. ARE THOSE FILED SEPARATELY? THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT PER THE CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS CONCERNING THIS ITEM. MADAM CHAIR, IT PLEASES COMMISSION. YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 90 IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION. MOTION BALLARD SECOND JONES. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. ITEM 91. ITEM 91 IS MANSFIELD MANOR PRESERVE. THE SITE IS IN HOUSTON, CORPORATE LIMITS SOUTH OF MANFIELD STREET AND WEST OF TC JESTER BOULEVARD EAST ALONG ODYSSEY DUNES DRIVE AND WEST ALONG CASSINI TOUR DRIVE. THE REASON FOR REPL IS TO CREATE ONE RECREATION RESERVE. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO REPL TWO SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND A LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE RESERVE INTO A RECREATION RESERVE. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST. THE SITE IS A RELIGHT OF TWO LOTS AND A LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE RESERVE CREATED WITH THE MANSFIELD MANNER. AMENDING PLAT NUMBER ONE RECORDED IN 2026. THE PROPERTY IS VACANT AND STILL UNDER THE DEVELOPER'S CONTROL AND NO LOTS HAVE BEEN SOLD IN THE SUBDIVISION. THE DEVELOPER DESIRES TO RE PLAT AND DEVELOP THE SITE AS A RECREATIONAL RESERVE TO PROVIDE A POOL, RESTROOMS, PICKLE BALL COURT, AND OTHER AMENITIES TO THE SUBDIVISION. THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON A FACE OF PLAT OF THOSE FILES. SEPARATELY, THE RE PLAT WILL PROVIDE AMENITIES TO THE SUBDIVISION THAT IS CONDUCIVE TO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. HOUSTON PUBLIC WORKS HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT PER THE CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS ITEM. MADAM CHAIR, IF YOU PLEASES THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 91 IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS. SECOND. OKAY. MOTION SIGLER SECOND NARANJO. ALL IN FAVOR? A OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. MOVING ON TO 92. ITEM 92 IS MARTIN DEVELOPED DESIGN, MCDANIEL'S REPL NUMBER ONE. THE SIGN IS IN HOUSTON CORPORATE LIMITS SOUTH ALONG MCDANIEL STREET, EAST OF JENSEN ROAD. THE REASON FOR RELA IS TO CREATE 24 LOTS AND THREE RESERVES AND CORRECT THE BOUNDARY LINES. THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION, THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED THAT THIS ITEM BE DEFERRED. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THE THE PLA PER THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST. STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY COMMENTS IN ADVANCE FOR THIS ITEM. MADAM CHAIR PLEASES COMMISSION. YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 92 IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'LL CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION GARZA. MOTION GARZA. SECOND SHEPHERD. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. MOVING ON TO ITEM 93. ITEM 93 IS MONTROSE HEIGHTS. THE SUBJECT SIDE IS NEARLY 20,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CITY LIMITS AT THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE AND COMMONWEALTH AVENUE. THE REASON FOR THE REPL IS CREATE ONE UNRESTRICTED RESERVE. THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. THIS IS A REPL OF RESERVE, A BLOCK ONE OF HYDE PARK PARTIAL PLT NUMBER TWO RECORDED IN 2014 AND LOT FIVE BLOCK 18 OF THE ORIGINAL HYDE PARK SUBDIVISION REVIEW. BILINGUAL INDICATES THE PROPOSED PLAT DOES NOT VIOLATE ANY CITY ENFORCEABLE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED. SEPARATELY, WE HAVE RECEIVED ADVANCED COMMENTS REGARDING CONCERNS OVER DEED RESTRICTIONS [00:35:01] AND PROPERTY MAINTENANCE. THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN DEFERRED TWICE. ONCE FOR EXTENDED REVIEW OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS AND ONCE AT THE REQUEST OF TWO CITY COUNCIL PERSONS STAFF. RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CCP C 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. MA'AM CHAIR YOU PLEASE THE COMMISSION. YOU MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR NOT ITEM 93 IS CONTINUED. UM, I'VE GOT SEVERAL SPEAKERS. MY FIRST SPEAKER IS SCOTT SHAMA AND IF I MISPRONOUNCE YOUR NAME, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CORRECT ME. GOOD AFTERNOON. HELLO, MY NAME IS SCOTT SHAMAN. I LIVE AT 2100 COMMONWEALTH, ONLY A BLOCK OR TWO AWAY FROM THIS, UH, DEVELOPMENT. UM, I JUST WANTED TO STATE THAT, UH, I BOUGHT INTO THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IN 2024 BECAUSE IT'S QUIET, IT'S WALKABLE. UH, IT'S ALL RESIDENTIAL. I'D LIKE IT TO STAY THAT WAY. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THIS, UH, DEVELOPER THAT OWNS THIS PROPERTY, IF UNRESTRICTED WILL BE ABLE TO BUILD WHATEVER HE WANTS, WHICH IS SOMETHING I DO NOT WANT TO SEE. UM, I'D LIKE TO SEE RESIDENTIAL THERE AND NOT LIKE HIGH COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL. ANYTHING THAT'S GONNA BE POLLUTANTS LIKE NOISE OR, OR WORSE. UM, I'VE LIVED IN OTHER MAJOR CITIES AND I'VE SEEN WHAT DEVELOPERS CAN DO TO NEIGHBORHOODS 'CAUSE THEY DON'T TAKE THE BEST INTEREST OF THEIR RESIDENTS IN MIND. SO I DEFINITELY OPPOSE THIS. UM, AND UM, YEAH, I OPPOSE THE REZONING AND I BELIEVE THAT IS ALL I HAVE. WE APPRECIATE YOU COMING IN TODAY AND SHARING YOUR COMMENTS. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS AUGUSTINE. AND COULD YOU STATE YOUR FULL NAME WHEN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM PLEASE? HI, MY NAME IS AUGUSTINE PEREIRA. FIRST OF ALL, THANK YOU FOR THE COMMISSION FOR YOUR SERVICES. THIS, UH, EASTERN COMMUNITY. I MOVED FROM WOODLANDS AROUND EIGHT YEARS BACK, UH, TO DOWNTOWN AND SELECTED MONTES AT THE AREA, WHICH IS, UH, VERY, UH, SAFE FOR MY FAMILY AND MY CHILDREN FOR HIGHER EDUCATION. UH, THIS COMMUNITY, UH, HAS HYDE PARK HAS NEARLY THREE PARKS AND ONE SCHOOL, VERY SAFE AREA. I SEE PEOPLE WALKING THEIR DOGS TO THE COMMUNITY, TO THE PARK EVERY DAY, MORNING, AFTERNOON, EVENING. AND AS MYSELF AS WELL. UH, OVER THE YEARS, I SEE ONLY, UH, CHANGES IS LOT OF CHANGES ON COMMERCIAL, UH, SORRY, THE RESIDENCE PROPERTY. NO COMMERCIALS AT ALL. AND ALSO I NOTICE A LITTLE BIT INCREASE IN TRAFFIC, WHICH IS, WHICH IS MAKES SENSE BECAUSE OF THE POPULATION INCREASE IN, UH, NOW WHAT I'M AFRAID IS THE COMMERCIAL. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT IS COMING UP IN THAT PROPERTY. IF THE COMMERCIAL COMES, THE PROPERTY IS, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD IS IN DANGER. THE REASON IS NOISE, TRAFFIC, UH, CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES, AND ALSO THE PARK AND ADJACENT TO THE SCHOOL. THERE ARE A LOT OF CHILDREN CROSSING THE ROAD OR TO THE, GOING TO THE SCHOOL IN THE MORNING, AFTERNOON AND IN THE EVENING. EVENING. SO MY REQUEST TO THE, UH, COMMISSION IS, UH, IF IT IS APPROVED ONLY FOR THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS, UH, FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE AND NOT FOR A COMMERCIAL PURPOSE. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU SO MUCH. WE APPRECIATE YOU COMING IN, SHARING YOUR COMMENTS. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS ELIZABETH BURT. AGAIN, IF I MESS YOUR NAME UP, PLEASE CORRECT ME. HI, I'M ELIZABETH BURT. I LIVE AT 1515 HYDE PARK. JUST ONE BLOCK OVER FROM THIS PROPERTY. UM, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE TO THE CITIZENS OF HOUSTON AND FOR LISTENING TO US TODAY. UM, I HAVE LIVED IN HYDE PARK FOR 26 YEARS. IT'S ALMOST HARD TO BELIEVE IT'S BEEN THAT LONG BECAUSE THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS REMAINED THE SAME AT HEART DURING THAT TIME. IT'S QUIET, WALKABLE, SAFE, FRIENDLY, CARING, UNIQUE, WELCOMING, FILLED WITH DILIGENT NEIGHBORS, A GOOD INVESTMENT AND A FANTASTIC PLACE TO LIVE. OVER THE YEARS, I HAVE SEEN SMALL CHANGES TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. SPECIFICALLY, I'VE NOTICED INCREASE IN TRAFFIC ON COMMONWEALTH AND LAW, A SORT OF OVERFLOW FROM MONTROSE BOULEVARD. I'M SURE THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION HAS NOTICED TOO. WITHOUT FURTHER INFO ON PLANS. WHAT I FEAR FROM THE PROPOSED REPLANTING OF THIS PROPERTY IS THAT THE DEVELOPER WOULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THESE TRAFFIC PATTERNS BY OPENING SOME SORT OF BUSINESS THERE. BUSINESSES IN THIS AREA MOSTLY SERVE THE LOCAL COMMUNITY AND ARE VERY WELCOME. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO SUPPORT GROWING TRAFFIC AND PEOPLE PASSING THROUGH OUR WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOOD. I DON'T WANT A BUSINESS THAT ATTRACTS AND SUPPORTS MORE TRAFFIC IN THE VERY HEART OF HYDE PARK, SO CLOSE [00:40:01] TO MY HOME AND NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLS. I ALSO FEAR THAT A HIGH DENSITY LIVING COMMUNITY COULD BE CREATED. THE RESULTING INCREASE IN TRAFFIC WOULD DIRECTLY IMPACT ME AS I WALK OR DRIVE THROUGH THE FAIRVIEW COMMONWEALTH INTERSECTION ON AN ALMOST DAILY BASIS. THIS WOULD ALSO IMPACT MY PROPERTY VALUE. JUST ONE BLOCK OVER. I'M OPPOSED TO USING THIS PROPERTY. I'M NOT OPPOSED TO USING THIS PROPERTY. IN LINE WITH THE DEED RESTRICTIONS. MEMBERS OF OUR COMMUNITY HAVE WORKED HARD TO ENACT RESTRICTIONS THAT APPLY TO THIS PROPERTY. REPLANTING THE PROPERTY COULD MAKE THOSE DEED RESTRICTIONS MOOT. I RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT THE COMMISSION HELP OUR COMMUNITY AND OTHERS WITH DEED RESTRICTIONS TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF WHAT HAPPENS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS WITH ONE OF THE ONLY TOOLS WE HAVE. IN THE ABSENCE OF ZONING LAWS, PLEASE HONOR THE DESIRES AND HARD WORK OF THE HYDE PARK COMMUNITY BY DENYING THE PROPOSED REPL OF THIS PROPERTY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOU COMING IN. THANK YOU. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS ROCKY TON. GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS AND MADAM CHAIR. I'M ROCKY NEWTON, A HYDE PARK RESIDENT AND PROPERTY OWNER FOR 30 YEARS. AND I'M HERE TO, AGAIN, TO REQUEST THAT YOU DENY THIS REPL. DUE TO THE FACT THAT 1506 FAIRVIEW IS DEED RESTRICTED TO SINGLE FAMILY, OUR HYDE PARK DEED RESTRICTIONS HAVE EXISTED FOR OVER 30 YEARS. AND WERE DUTIFUL DUTIFULLY FILED AND ARE BINDING OUR DEED RESTRICTIONS. PROTECT OUR PROPERTY VALUES. THE CHARACTER OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PREVENT EXCESS TRAFFIC. AND AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE CITY SHOULD NOT BE DENYING THOSE WHO HOLD CONTRACT RIGHTS FOR THEIR PROPERTY AND TO VIOLATE THE STATUTE THAT APPLIES THIS MANNER. THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING THE CONCERNS OF OUR HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU SO MUCH. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS DAVID TAYLOR. GOOD AFTERNOON. AFTERNOON, UH, MADAM CHAIRMAN COMMISSION. MEMBERS THANK Y'ALL. UH, HOPEFULLY YOU SAW A PACKAGE. WHAT I HOPE TO DO TODAY IS CONVINCE YOU TO VOTE. CONTRARY TO THE LEGAL ADVICE, THERE ARE DEED RESTRICTIONS ON THE PROPERTY. THEY ARE VALID. WE'VE GIVEN EACH OF YOU A COPY OF THE OWNER TO TIME OPTING INTO THOSE DEED RESTRICTIONS. AND THEN WHEN HE SOLD THE PROPERTY, NOTIFYING THE NEW BUYER OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS, THE CITY ATTORNEY, AS I HEARD IT, PUT IT VERY WELL THAT THEY ARE DEED RESTRICTIONS NOT ENFORCEABLE BY THE CITY. THAT DOESN'T MEAN THERE AREN'T ANY, AND THIS PLAT WOULD SAY THERE AREN'T ANY. WE BELIEVE THAT IT IS CONTRARY TO THE GOVERNMENT CODE 2 1 2 0.0146, WHICH STATES A REPL MUST NOT ATTEMPT TO AMEND OR REMOVE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS. UH, WE'VE PROVIDED ALL OF THIS TO LEGAL EARLIER IN THE WEEK. UH, I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF THE COMMISSION HAS. SO THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS? OKAY, THANK YOU MR. TAYLOR. WE APPRECIATE IT. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS SARAH FRAZIER. GOOD AFTERNOON. OKAY, GOOD AFTERNOON. I'M SARAH FRAZIER. I'M THE PRESIDENT OF HYDE PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION. YOU SHOULD HAVE MY TWO PAGE HANDOUT. AS DAVID TAYLOR JUST STATED, WE THINK THAT THERE IS AN ISSUE WITH THE LEGAL OPINION NOT, UH, MEETING THE STANDARD OF THE STATUTE, WHICH IS TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE REPL WOULD AMEND OR REMOVE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS UNDER TWO 12.014. UM, WHAT THE CITY DECIDED INSTEAD WAS THAT, UH, THEY DID NOT SEE A VIOLATION OF A CITY ENFORCEABLE RESTRICTION. UM, THEY'RE NOT ANSWERING WHETHER ANY RESTRICTION EXISTS. UM, HYDE PARK DOES HAVE RESTRICTIONS, AS OTHER PEOPLE HAVE STATED, AND THEIR PRIVATE ENFORCEABILITY IS NOT QUESTIONED HERE. THERE ARE COMMON LAW RESTRICTIONS, UM, RATHER THAN THE STATUTORY FORMS THAT OF RESTRICTIONS PASSED IN 1987 THAT ARE QUITE UNIQUE IN PROPERTY LAW FOR BEING ENFORCEABLE BY THE CITY. IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH OUR COMMON LAW, UM, RESTRICTIONS, NOR SHOULD THE CITY BE CONCERNED THAT IT IS SOMEHOW ENFORCING THEM BY ACKNOWLEDGING THEIR EXISTENCE AS IT DOES WITH PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENTS, OIL AND GAS LEASES AND ACCESS RIGHTS. SO WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR IS THAT THE COMMISSION SERIOUSLY LOOK AT THE QUESTION OF WHAT THE STANDARD IS AND ASK THE QUESTION OF WHETHER ANY RESTRICTION APPLIES HERE. UM, WE HAVE A VERY TRADITIONAL, UM, A PRIVATELY ENFORCEABLE RESTRICTION, AND IT SHOULD COUNT IN THAT QUESTION. UM, THAT'S JUST A PLAIN READING OF THE STATUTE AND I I WOULD HOPE THAT Y'ALL COULD [00:45:01] ENGAGE IN THAT CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND IF, IF I MAY FOR ONE SECOND MORE. AT PREVIOUS HEARINGS, IT'S COME UP THAT THE DEVELOPER'S MAJOR WORK THAT HE DOES IS TO BUILD GAS STATIONS, SPECIFICALLY FAKE BUCKY'S GAS STATIONS. SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU. YOU. OKAY. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS HUGO LOZANO. GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD AFTERNOON. HELLO, MY NAME IS HUGO LOZANO. I LIVE IN 1515 FAIRVIEW, WHICH IS RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE 1506 FAIRVIEW. MY WIFE AND I PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY TWO YEARS AGO TO RAISE OUR YOUNG CHILDREN AND ACCEPTED HYDE PARK'S DE RESTRICTIONS WHEN WE PURCHASED THE PROPERTY. I UNDERSTAND THAT IF THE COMMISSION ALLOWS THIS, UH, REPL, THEN THE WHOLE NEW PARCEL WILL BE CATEGORIZED AS UNRESTRICTED USE AND THAT WE, ME AND MY WIFE, WE KNOW THAT THE, THE CURRENT OWNERS ARE INVESTORS AND DESPITE THEM SAYING THAT THEY MAY BE DOING, UH, MULTI-FAMILY, UH, DEVELOPMENT, THEY COULD DO ANYTHING WITH IT. AND THAT'S A REAL CONCERN. LIKE, UH, SARAH JUST, UH, MENTIONED, UH, WE'RE ALSO CONCERNED THAT THE, THE SAME THING COULD HAPPEN TO OTHER DE RESTRICTED LOTS IN HYDE PARK SETTING A PRECEDENT THAT ERODES PROTECTIONS RELIED UPON BY THE ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND I WOULD LIKE TO ADD THAT BAKER MONTESSORI SCHOOL IS A BLOCK AWAY. THERE'S ALREADY HIGH TRAFFIC IN THAT AREA WITH YOUNG KIDS GOING FROM SCHOOL AND ADDING ANY TYPE OF, UH, NEW DEVELOPMENT, WHETHER IT'S HIGH DENSITY HOUSING OR COMMERCIAL USE WILL, WILL CAUSE, UH, SAFETY ISSUES DESPITE THE, THE ALREADY EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS THAT ARE INCREASING IN FURTHER ALREADY. SO, UH, WE URGE THE, THE COMMISSION TO CONSIDER WHAT THE, THE DE RESTRICTIONS ARE AND THE, THE, THE SCHOOL THAT'S ALREADY THERE AND THE ANY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY ISSUES THAT MAY COME UP WITH THE KIDS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOU COMING IN TODAY. THE LAST SPEAKER I HAVE IS MARY VIAL. I SEE YOU'RE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. UH, WAS THERE SOMETHING YOU WANTED TO MENTION? GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD AFTERNOON. MAD CHAIR MEMBERS IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION. UM, AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, UM, THE OWN DEVELOPER IS WORKING WITH AN ARCHITECT FOR MULTI-FAMILY. UM, I UNDERSTAND WITH IT BEING UNRESTRICTED THAT, YOU KNOW, UM, IT COULD BE SOMETHING ELSE, YOU KNOW, THIS IS THE TRUTH. BUT, UM, PLANNING, UM, STAFF HAS ASKED, UH, TO SEE IF I CAN FIND IF THE OWNER WOULD BE WILLING TO RESTRICT IT TO MULTIFAMILY. BUT, UM, I HAVEN'T RECEIVED A RESPONSE FROM HIM AND I KNOW WE'RE SHORT ON TIME, SO I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO MAKE THAT DECISION AT THIS TIME. I WOULD NEED TO GO WITH LEGAL'S RECOMMENDATION AND STAFFS. OKAY. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. ANY QUESTIONS? OKAY, COMMISSIONER HINES. I, I DO HAVE A, A QUESTION. UM, CAN WE DEFER VOTING ON THIS TOWARDS THE END OF THE MEETING? I THINK IT'S BEEN DEFERRED TWICE ALREADY. TOWARDS THE END OF THIS MEETING. YEAH. OH, MOVE THIS TO THE END OF THE MEETING SINCE SHE'S TRYING TO REACH THE UM, I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. WOULD THAT MAKE A DIFFERENCE? IT MIGHT. SORRY. IT MIGHT, IT MIGHT. I REQUESTED THAT I GET THE NUMBER, UM, SO I CAN SEE, CALL HIM OUTSIDE. SO I PERSONALLY WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT IF WE COULD RESTRICT IT TO MULTI-FAMILY. I MEAN, I MEAN IF HE'S WILLING YES, I KNOW RYAN. SO IF THAT'S POSSIBLE. YES. SINCE YOU BROUGHT IT UP, I JUST WANNA GIVE YOU THE TIME. I CAN YOU CAN DO IT. DO THAT. YEAH, WE CAN DO THAT. WE NEED CONSENSUS. UM, WE DO. SO COMMISSIONER HEINZ, THAT'S A MOTION TO MOVE IT TO BEHIND ROMAN NUMERAL FIVE. I SECOND THAT. YES. OKAY. SO A MOTION TO MOVE IT TO AFTER ROMAN NUMERAL FIVE SECOND BY BALLARD. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. NO THANK YOU. YOU OPPOSED? OH, , YOU LOOK LIKE YOU'RE JUMPING OUTTA YOUR CHAIR. OKAY. . THANK YOU. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OH WAIT, CAROL HAS A QUESTION. YES, COMMISSIONER CAROL, I HAVE A QUESTION REGARDING THE, I THINK I UNDERSTAND THE NUANCE OF THE LEGAL, UM, THAT THEIR QUESTION THAT THE DEED RESTRICTIONS ARE INDEED IN PLACE, ESPECIALLY FOR THIS LOT SINCE THE PRIOR OWNER, UH, SIGNED THEM BACK IN 1983, AUGUST OF, OF 93, EXCUSE ME, 93. UM, IS THE, IS THE QUESTION THAT LEGAL JUST DOESN'T ACKNOWLEDGE THOSE DEED RESTRICTIONS BUT THEY ARE DEFINITELY IN PLACE? IS THAT [00:50:01] THE QUESTION? LEGAL DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO OPINE ON WHETHER THE PURPORTED RESTRICTIONS ARE VALID, EVEN IF THEY WERE VALID. THEY'RE AMONG RESTRICTIONS. THE CITY DOES NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE, TO ENFORCE THEM, BUT THEY CAN AT LEAST ACKNOWLEDGE THEM. NO, WE CAN'T ISSUE PRIVATE LEGAL ADVICE. OKAY. RIGHT. OKAY. THAT WAS A QUESTION, NOT A STATEMENT. UNDERSTOOD. YES. COMMISSIONER SIGLER. SO, UM, WOULD THIS BE CONSIDERED A OUR TYPICAL SHALL APPROVE ITEM? YES, IT IS. CORRECT. OKAY. YES IT IS. THERE ARE NO DEED RESTRICTIONS. THERE'S NO DEED RESTRICTIONS. OKAY. THERE'S NO REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE. CORRECT, MR. CORRECT. OKAY. SO THIS WOULD FALL UNDER THE TYPICAL PARAMETERS OF A SHALL APPROVE. RIGHT. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YEAH, LET'S CLOSE THIS OUT. OKAY, MOVE ON. OKAY. SO WE'LL MOVE ALONG NOW TO 94 AND FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE, I'M SURE YOU UNDERSTOOD, BUT OUR LAST UH, POINT OF ACTION IS ROMAN NUMERAL FIVE. WE'LL BRING THIS BACK AND HOPEFULLY MS. VIAL WILL HAVE HEARD FROM, UM, HER OWNER BY THEN. SO 94, 94, I THINK THEY'RE . I THINK IT'S ALL LANDY JONES. UM, I THINK COMMISSIONER GIANTS WHY HIS JUMPING OUTTA HIS CHAIR CAUSED SOME TECHNICAL ISSUES. ? YEAH. ONE MOMENT PLEASE. OKAY. GIVE US JUST A MINUTE. I SECOND THAT. YEAH. ARE YOU READY? YES, MA'AM. OKAY, LET'S MOVE ON WITH 94. ITEM 94 IS TEL GOST DEVELOPMENT. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS AT THE CORNER OF TGI AND OLD SPANISH TRAIL. THE PURPOSE OF THE RE PLAT IS TO CREATE ONE UNDERSTOOD RESERVE. THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THE PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. MADAM CHAIR, IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 94 IS OPEN. I HAVE A SPEAKER. ARGA BO BOURGEOIS BOIS BOURGEOIS. OH, THERE SHE'S, YEAH. GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONER. COOL. GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONER'S COURT. MY NAME IS ARGA BOURGEOIS AND I'M THE OWNER OF HOUSTON'S BEST VEGAN RESTAURANT. WE'RE LOCATED AT 31 0 2 OST AND I'M HERE TO, UM, OPPOSE THIS REPLANT 'CAUSE ONE WE WEREN'T PROPERLY NOTIFIED OF THIS. UH, THE SIGN THAT WAS PUT UP DOES NOT HAVE CORRECT INFORMATION ON WHO TO CONTACT ABOUT IT. IT HAS, UH, SIGMA FROM TEXAS LAND MAP. I'VE REACHED OUT TO THEM ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS. THEY WILL NOT GIVE ME THE INFORMATION ON THE OWNERS, WHAT ARE THEY PLANNING ON PUTTING THERE, UM, AND SO FORTH. I'VE ALSO, UH, REACHED OUT, UH, ON THE TEXAS WEBSITE TO SEE WHO THE DEVELOPERS ARE. UH, MY CONCERNS AND ISSUES IS I HAVE A HEALTH FOOD STORE WHERE WE'RE LOCATED IS AT THE CUSP OF THE MEDICAL CENTER. AND AS YOU KNOW, BY 2030 ALL THE WAY TO 2 88 WILL BE PART OF THE MEDICAL CENTER. MY RESTAURANT ALREADY WE'RE ALREADY FIGHTING FOR, UH, PARKING. I, UH, UH, TEX DOT CAME THROUGH ABOUT A YEAR AGO AND TOOK AWAY FIVE FEET. SO WE'RE SHORT ON PARKING. UM, THIS DEVELOPMENT, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS. IT'S GOING TO, UH, HAVE A PROBLEM WITH PARKING AND SO FORTH. FOR ME, UH, AS PART OF THE COMMUNITY, WE JUST WANT COMMUNICATION. WE WANNA KNOW WHAT YOU'RE PUTTING THERE. WHAT ARE YOU BUILDING, WHAT ARE YOUR PLANS? IS IT GONNA BE A GAS STATION, IS IT HIGH RISE? WHAT, WHATEVER. THIS IS BUSINESS AND WE JUST WANT TRANSPARENCY. SO, UH, RESPECTFULLY, I WOULD JUST, UH, REQUEST THAT YOU COULD DEFER THIS SO WE CAN GET THAT INFORMATION BECAUSE [00:55:01] COMMUNICATION IS KEY. SO I APPRECIATE YOU FOR LISTENING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING IN, SHARING YOUR COMMENTS. I HAVE NO ONE ELSE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO, OKAY, SO, UM, THAT'S WHAT I WAS GONNA ASK STAFF IF THE APPLICANT IS HERE BY CHANCE. ARE YOU THE APPLICANT? YEAH, THE APPLICANT'S HERE. OKAY, GREAT. COULD YOU COME FORWARD PLEASE? GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS GEORGE MORROW. THANK YOU. UH, I REPRESENT THE APPLICANT. UH, MATTHEW SIGMAN IS THE ACTUAL APPLICANT. HE COULDN'T BE HERE TODAY, SO I'M IN HERE IN HIS PLACE. SO I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER WHAT I CAN. YEAH, SO, SO WE HAVE YOU ONE, I'D LIKE TO ASK YOU TO GET TOGETHER WITH, UH, THE PREVIOUS SPEAKER FOR SURE. SO YOU CAN WALK THROUGH EVERYTHING WITH HER. AND SECONDARILY, CAN YOU TELL US TODAY WHAT, WHAT THE PLANS ARE? YOU HAVE ANY IDEAS AT THIS POINT? SO I DON'T HAVE ANY IDEA. THIS WAS REALLY SHORT NOTICE OF ME, SIR. ME COMING HERE TODAY, UNFORTUNATELY, UH, I WOULD BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO GET WITH HER AND GIVE HER MY CONTACT INFORMATION SO I CAN GET HER IN CONTACT WITH MATTHEW. UM, WE ALSO DO HAVE CONTACT WITH THE OWNER SO WE CAN GIVE HER THAT INFORMATION TOO. UM, SORRY THAT THAT HAPPENED. YOU KNOW, YOU WE'RE PRETTY YEAH, GOOD AT, THAT'S FINE. PLEASE DO ANSWER HIM CALLS, BUT YOU KNOW, THIS IS WHY I'M HERE. UM, BUT BESIDES THAT, I REALLY DON'T HAVE MUCH INFORMATION ON THIS. I'M NOT SURE WHAT'S GOING ON. I WASN'T WORKING ON THIS PROJECT. LIKE I SAID, I JUST CAME INTO SUB IN, I DIDN'T EXPECT ANYBODY TO BE HERE 'CAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY NOTIFICATIONS THAT I WAS AWARE OF. SO I MEAN, I, WELL THE VALUE PROPOSITION HERE IS YOU'LL GET IN TOUCH WITH THE PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF COURSE, AND THAT WOULD BE VERY MUCH APPRECIATED. THANK YOU. YES MA'AM. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? UM, JUST TO CONFIRM, IT'S A SHALL APPROVE, CORRECT? YOU'RE CORRECT? YEP. OKAY. I HAVE NO ONE ELSE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON ITEM 94. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WISHES TO OKAY, HEARING NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF. RECOMMENDATION. MOTION. MOTION. MAD SECOND GARZA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 95. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. ITEM 95 IS UE HOMES. THE SITE IS IN HOUSTON, CORPORATE LIMITS AT THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF WALLY VALE AND EAST CROSS TIMBER STREETS. THE REASON FOR REPLY IS TO CREATE THREE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOCKS AND TWO LANDSCAPING OPEN SPACE RESERVES. THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM. THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY. THE PLAT WAS DEFERRED AT THE LAST PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CHAPTER 42 STANDARDS. THE APPLICANT HAS REVISED THE PLAT AND NOW THE PLAT MEETS CHAPTER 42. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT PER THE CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY COMMENTS IN ADVANCE. MADAM CHAIR, IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 95 IS CONTINUED. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION GARZA. MOTION GARZA. SECOND. SECOND JONES. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES ITEM 96. ITEM 96 IS WARWICK PLACE, PARTIAL REPL. NUMBER TWO. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS AT THE INTERSECTION OF BRELAND AND SANDRA STREET. THE PURPOSE OF THE RELA IS TO CREATE TWO SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THE PLAT WILL VIOLATE BUILDING LINE D RESTRICTIONS FOR SUCH RECOMMENDATIONS TO DEFER THE PLAT PER THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST. MADAM CHAIR, IF IT PLEASE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 96 IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'LL CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION GARZA. MOTION GARZA. SECOND PIERCE. SECOND PIERCE. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. MOVING ON TO D SUBDIVISION [d. Subdivision Plats with Variance Requests (Devin Crittle, Tammi Williamson, and Petra Hsia) ] PLATS WITH VARIANCE REQUESTS. ITEM 97. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE HOUSTON PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS DEVIN CRIDDLE. ITEM 97 IS THE AMIRA GENERAL PLAN. THIS SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HARRIS COUNTY, NORTH OF THE GRAND PARKWAY AND EAST OF MKI ROAD. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO NOT EXTEND THE STUB STREET AND A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG THE NORTHERN GP. BOUNDARY STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF BOTH REQUEST. THE AMER GENERAL PLAN IS A 600 ACRE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY. THE MAJORITY OF [01:00:01] THE AREA WITHIN THE GENERAL PLAN HAS BEEN DEVELOPED AND THIS REQUEST PERTAINS TO THE NEWLY ACQUIRED EDITION IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT. REQUEST NUMBER ONE, THE PUBLIC STREET WAS RECORDED IN 2025 WITH THE RITH ROAD STREET DEDICATION. AT THAT TIME, THE STUB STREET WAS CREATED TO ADDRESS INTERSECTION SPACING. NOW THAT STREET STUBS INTO A DETENTION POND AND HAS NO USE AS IT REMAINS UNDEVELOPED. THE PLAN IS TO ABANDON THE STUB STREET AND UTILIZE THE STREET CONNECTION TO THE EAST. SECOND, THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS TO ALLOW INTERSECTION SPACING OF A DISTANCE OF 1600 FEET INSTEAD OF 1400 FEET, WHICH IS WITHIN A 30% DEVIATION OF THE STANDARD. IN TOTAL. THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY ONLY REQUIRES TWO STEP STREETS. AND THE, EXCUSE ME, THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY ONLY REQUIRES TWO STEP STREETS AND TWO STREETS ARE BEING PROVIDED. THESE STREET CONNECTIONS ARE DESIGNED AROUND A DETENTION POND, PROVIDING THE STREET CONNECTION ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DETENTION POND ENSURES EACH GROUP OF HOMES HAS ITS OWN INGRESS AND EGRESS WHEN TRAVELING NORTH. ULTIMATELY, HARRIS COUNTY HAS VOICED NO OBJECTION TO THIS REQUEST AND STAFF RECOMMENDS GRANTOR REQUESTED VARIANCE AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION AND APPROVING THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CCPC ONE FORM CONDITIONS. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS. IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? UH, MME. TRAVIS, WHAT'S THIS? YES. I SHOULD HAVE STEPPED OUT AND I DIDN'T WANT INTERRUPT HIM. OKAY. SO PLEASE NOTE YES. ALL RIGHT, I HAVE A MOTION. YES. MOTION GARZA FOR APPROVAL. SECOND BALLARD. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 98 WAS WITHDRAWN. I KNOW Y'ALL ARE JUST LEAVING ME SITTING HERE RIGHT NOW. UM, MOVING ON TO ITEM 99. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS TAMMY WILLIAMSON. ITEM 99 IS HUNTING SERVICES COMPLEX. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON'S CORPORATE LIMITS IN HARRIS COUNTY, EAST OF SOUTHWEST SIDE DRIVE AND SOUTH OF LONG DRIVE ON THE BLOCK BOUNDED BY MIDVALE STREET, HEFFERNAN STREET, MOLINE STREET AND LUCE STREET. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING ONE UNRESTRICTED RESERVE AND REQUESTING TWO VARIANCES. ONE NOT TO DEDICATE RIGHT OF WAY WIDENING ON ALL FOUR BLOCK FACES AND TWO TO ALLOW A DUAL BUILDING LINE FOR ONE STRUCTURE ENCROACHING THE 10 FOOT BUILDING LINE. STAFF RECOMMENDS TO DEFER THE APPLICATION FOR TWO WEEKS TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TIME TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS IN ADVANCE AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION. MOTION MAREZ. SECOND. SECOND MANCA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES ITEM 100. ITEM 100 IS MASON BUSINESS PARK GP. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON'S EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN WESTERN HARRIS COUNTY, NORTH OF IH 10, EAST OF THE GRAND PARKWAY AND WEST OF MASON ROAD. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A GENERAL PLAN INTENDED FOR COMMERCIAL USE AND REQUESTING SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AND VARIANCES TO ALLOW EXCESSIVE MINIMUM INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG IH 10 FOR PROPOSED STREET CONNECTIONS. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED THE ITEM TO BE FOR DEFERRED FOR TWO WEEKS AS THIS IS THE SECOND DEFERRAL. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A BRIEF PRESENTATION. YES, PLEASE. THE SUBJECT SITE IS SEPARATED FROM IH TEN'S FEEDER LANES BY HARRIS HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT DRAINAGE CHANNEL OWN AND FEE. THE APPLICANT HAS OBTAINED ACCESS EASEMENTS FROM H-C-F-C-D FOR FIVE CONNECTIONS TO THE FREEWAY FRONTAGE ROAD, AND HAS BEGUN THE PROCESS OF OBTAINING DRIVEWAY ACCESS PERMITS FROM TXDOT. AT THOSE FIVE LOCATIONS, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO EXCEED THE MINIMUM INTERSECTION SPACING REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW ALL FIVE TO BE PUBLIC STREET CONNECTIONS. TO IH 10, THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES A MINIMUM INTERSECTION SPACING OF 600 FEET ALONG A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE OR FREEWAY BETWEEN TWO LOCAL STREETS AND 400 FEET FROM A LOCAL STREET AND A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE. THE TWO PROPOSED LOCAL STREETS ON THE WEST ARE SPECIAL, SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUESTS BECAUSE THE DEVIATION FROM THE STANDARD REQUIREMENTS OF 600 FEET IS 33% OR LESS DURING THE DEFERRAL PERIOD. TXDOT PROVIDED THAT THE MINIMUM CONNECTION SPACING FOR A 50 MILE PER HOUR FRONTAGE ROAD WOULD BE 425 FEET, BUT THAT ALL ROADWAY TIE-INS MUST BE SUBMITTED BY A PUBLIC ENTITY. PRIVATE ENTITIES ARE ALLOWED TO REQUEST PRIVATE DRIVEWAY ACCESS PERMITS, BUT IN THIS CASE, ONLY HARRIS COUNTY HAS THE AUTHORITY TO REQUEST PUBLIC STREET TIE-INS. WITH THIS NEW INFORMATION, THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A DEFERRAL TO CONFER WITH OUR CLIENT AND THE ENGINEERING TEAM STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS IN ADVANCE. AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. IF YOU HAVE NO QUESTIONS, DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO DEFER? MOTION. [01:05:01] MOTION. MOTION. AMANDA PACO. SECOND GARZA. SECOND GARZA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES ITEM 1 0 1. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS PETRA SHAW. ITEM 1 0 1 IS SHEKINAH LIFE CENTER. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN DEFERRED TWICE AND CANNOT BE DEFERRED AGAIN. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS HARRIS COUNTY, SOUTH LONG HOLMAN STREET, EAST OF NALLY STREET, WEST OF TIER WESTERN STREET IN NORTH OF WINDBORN STREET. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING AN UNRESTRICTED RESERVE FOR COMMUNITY CENTER AND IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A FIVE FOOT BUILDING LINE ALONG NALLY STREET. INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 10 FOOT BUILDING LINE STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT OR TOD AREA. HOLMAN STREET NORTH OF THE SITE IN TIER WESTERN STREET EAST OF THE SITE ARE BOTH DESIGNATED SECONDARY TOD STREETS. THE APPLICANT IS OPTING INTO THE TOD STANDARDS, WHICH REQUIRES THE SITE TO PROVIDE A 15 FOOT PEDESTRIAN REALM ALONG HOLMAN STREET AND TIERWESTER STREET AND INCORPORATE PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING AND SAFETY BUFFERS, CREATING A SAFER AND MORE INVITING ENVIRONMENT. ALTHOUGH NALLY STREET IS NOT A DESIGNATED TOD STREET, WITH THE FIVE FOOT RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION REQUIRED AND THE REQUESTED REDUCED BUILDING LINE OF FIVE FEET, THE PROPOSED PLAT IS ABLE TO MAINTAIN A PEDESTRIAN REALM OF AT LEAST 15 FEET IN WIDTH. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PROPOSING SIDEWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN REALM IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE STREET CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROPOSED PARKING FOR THE SITE WILL BE LOCATED EAST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ACROSS TIER WESTERN STREET. LOCATING THE PARKING OFF SITE ELIMINATES THE NEED FOR CURB CUTS ALONG THE SUBJECT SITE, RESULTING IN A SAFER, MORE CONTINUOUS PEDESTRIAN REALM. STAFF HAS RECEIVED ONE PUBLIC COMMENT IN ADVANCE CONCERNING PARKING AND THE POSSIBILITY FOR OVERFLOW INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. HOWEVER, THERE IS NO PARKING VARIANCE BEING REQUESTED AND PARKING FOR THE SITE IS INTENDED. OFFSITE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE IN APPROVED THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, DO I HAVE A MOTION? YES. COMMISSIONER QUESTION. SO FOR THE PARKING OFF OUTSIDE, DO THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION ON AN AGREEMENT OR SOMETHING OR, UM, IT'S THEIR, THEIR PROPERTY. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, IF THERE ARE OTHER QUESTIONS, DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION. MOTION. MAD GARZA. SECOND GARZA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 1 0 2, ITEM 1 0 2 IS TGI HILL BUSINESS PARK. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON'S EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN NORTHERN HARRIS COUNTY ALONG TGE ROAD NORTH OF GRANT ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE GRAND PARKWAY. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING ONE RESERVE RESTRICTED TO COMMERCIAL USE AND IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW EXCESSIVE INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG TGE ROAD. BY NOT PROVIDING AN EAST WEST PUBLIC STREET STAFF RECOMMENDS TO DEFER THE APPLICATION FOR TWO WEEKS PER HARRIS COUNTY ENGINEERING'S REQUEST. STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS IN ADVANCE. AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION GARZA. MOTION GARZA. SECOND CAROL. SECOND JONES. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. WE HAVE, UH, NO ITEMS UNDER E SO WE'LL MOVE ALONG TO F RECONSIDERATION [f. Reconsiderations of Requirement (John Cedillo, Petra Hsia, and Devin Crittle) ] OF REQUIREMENT. MAD A CHAIR? YES. I NEED RE QUEUE FROM 1 0 5, 1 0 8 TO ONE 10. THANK YOU. OKAY. ALRIGHT. ITEM 1 0 3 IS BEARING DRIVE RESERVES. THE SUBJECT SIDE IS A SIX ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CITY LIMITS WEST ALONG BEARING DRIVE SOUTH OF SAN FELIPE AND WEST OF CHIMNEY ROCK. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TWO UNRESTRICTED RESERVES AND IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING BY NOT PROVIDING AN EAST WEST STREET THROUGH THE SITE. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST IS IN IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST. THE SITE IS AN EXISTING CHURCH SITE ON THE NORTHERN PORTION AND AN EXISTING OFFICE ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION. THE INTENT OF THE REPL IS TO LET THE OFFICE SITE ABSORB 50% OF 50 FOOT WIDE SLIVER OF THE CHURCH SITE TO INCREASE ITS ONSITE PARKING. THERE ARE PERMITS REQUIRED, UH, TO IMPROVE THE PARKING AREA, BUT THEY WOULD NOT NORMALLY BE GRANTED AS A SITE EXISTS AS LOTS. THE REPL ALLOWS THE CHANGE OF USE AND THE TRANSFER OF THE PROPERTY, BUT HAS TRIGGERED THE VARIANCE REQUEST DUE TO INTERSECTION SPACING AND EAST WEST STREET COULD POTENTIALLY CONNECT TO THE SUB OF INWOOD DRIVE TO THE WEST. HOWEVER, THERE ARE TWO RECORDED APARTMENT COMPLEX, UH, PLATS THAT WOULD HINDER ANY POTENTIAL CONNECTION AND THE CHURCH INTENDS TO CONTINUE ITS EXISTING USE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUEST OF VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CCP C 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. MA'AM, CHAIR, THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION. [01:10:01] THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. IF YOU HAVE NO QUESTIONS, DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION GARZA. MOTION SILER. SECOND GARZA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 1 0 4, ITEM 1 0 4 IS HILLCROFT BUSINESS PARK. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS HARRIS COUNTY, SOUTH OF WEST ORM DRIVE ALONG HILLCROFT AVENUE. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING AN UNRESTRICTED PRESERVE AND IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG HILLCROFT AVENUE BY NOT EXTENDING NOR TERMINATING BONITA STREET IN A CUL-DE-SAC. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED ALONG HILLCROFT AVENUE, A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE THAT REQUIRES AN EAST WEST STREET EVERY 2,600 FEET. THE INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG HILLCROFT AVENUE BETWEEN WEST ORUM DRIVE AND BELTWAY EIGHT MEASURES APPROXIMATELY 4,400 FEET. HOWEVER, DUE TO THE CLOSE PROXIMITY OF THE SITE TO THE INTERSECTION OF WEST ORM DRIVE IN HILLCROFT AVENUE, MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 380 FEET REQUIRING THE EXTENSION OF BONITA STREET THROUGH THE PROPERTY WOULD NOT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE THE OVERALL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IN THE AREA. IN ADDITION, THE SITE IS BOUNDED TO THE NORTH AND WEST BY A HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT DRAINAGE EASEMENT CONTAINING EXISTING DRAINAGE CHANNELS, WHICH MAY ENCUMBER THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC STREET. CONNECTION TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS ALSO AN ESTABLISHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION WITH THREE EXISTING POINTS OF ACCESS REQUIRING THE EXTENSION OF BONITA STREET THROUGH THE SUBJECT SITE, WOULD NOT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IN AND OUT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND WOULD INTRODUCE COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC INTO THE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. THIS CONCLUDES MY, UM, PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS. IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION SYKES. MOTION SYKES. SECOND GARZA. SECOND BALLARD. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. UH, PLEASE NOTE, UH, THAT COMMISSIONER MAREZ IS RECUSING FROM 1 0 5. ITEM 1 0 5 IS THE MIDLINE DETENTION RESERVES SECTION ONE. THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE ETJ OF HARRIS COUNTY EAST ALONG EL DORADO BOULEVARD. BETWEEN BEAMER ROAD AND INTERSTATE 45, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A RECONSIDERATION OF REQUIREMENT TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING BY NOT PROVIDING A NORTH SOUTH STREET THROUGH THE TRACT. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST. THE SITE IS A PORTION OF LAND OUT OF THE MIDLAND GENERAL PLAN INTENDED FOR DRAINAGE AND DETENTION. THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE NEAREST INTERSECTION ALONG GLEN WEST DRIVE IS ROUGHLY 2,800 FEET AND STRICT INTERPRETATION OF THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES A PUBLIC STREET TO BE DEDICATED WITH THIS PROPOSED PLAT. JUSTIFICATION FOR SUPPORTING THE REQUEST IS BASED ON THE PUBLIC STREET SYSTEM WITHIN THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE APPROVED STREET PATTERN WITHIN A GENERAL PLAN DOES NOT HAVE A STREET CONNECTION TO THIS TRACK, MEANING IF A PUBLIC STREET WAS TO BE DEDICATED, IT WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO MAKE A CONNECTION AND WOULD REMAIN A STUB STREET UNTIL THE GP IS REDEVELOPED THE SURROUNDING AREA, EXCUSE ME. THE SURROUNDING AREA PROVIDES MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS TO NEARBY MAJOR FAIR AIRFARES AND INTERSTATE 45. ALSO, THE SITE HAS PROPOSED TO BE DETENTION AND WOULD NOT GENERATE ANY PUBLIC VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. HARRIS COUNTY HAS VOICED NO OBJECTION TO THIS REQUEST AND STAFF RECOMMENDS GRANTING THE REQUEST OF VARIANCE AND A PROVEN OF RECONSIDERATION SUBJECT TO THE CCPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION. MOTION JONES. SECOND. SECOND BALLARD. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. MOVING ON TO G EXTENSION OF APPROVAL. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS NATHAN COOPER. IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, STAFF WOULD LIKE TO TAKE SECTIONS GHI AND JJ AS ONE GROUP? YES. AND PLEASE. LET'S NOTE 1 0 8 AND ONE 10. MAREZ IS ABSTAINING FROM. PLEASE PROCEED. THANKS. ALRIGHT, SECTION [Platting Activities g - j] G EXTENSIONS OF APPROVAL CONSISTS OF ITEMS 1 0 6 THROUGH ONE 11 SECTION H. NAME CHANGES CONSISTS OF NO ITEMS. SECTION I CERTIFICATE OF, UH, COMPLIANCE CONSISTS OF NO ITEMS. SECTION J ADMINISTRATIVE CONSISTS OF NO ITEMS. THE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUESTS THE APPROVAL OF ALL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SECTIONS GHI AND J. THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS. DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION GARZA. SECOND CAROL. MOTION GARZA. SECOND CAROL. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. MOVING ON TO K [k. Development Plats with Variance Requests (Devin Crittle) ] DEVELOPMENT PLATS WITH VARIANCE REQUESTS. ITEM ONE 12 IS A DEVELOPMENT PLAT VARIANCE FOR [01:15:01] A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5,500 EVERGREEN STREET. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN SOUTHWEST HOUSTON AT THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF CHIMNEY ROCK ROAD AND EVERGREEN STREET. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 15 FOOT BUILDING LINE ALONG A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IN LIEU OF THE REQUIRED 25 FOOT BUILDING. LINE STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST. THE SITE IS A CORNER PROPERTY FROM THE RICHMOND PLAZA ADDITION SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN 1942. AT THAT TIME, THE PROPERTY WAS PLATTED WITH A 15 FOOT BUILDING LAWN IN LONG CHIMNEY ROCK. SHORTLY AFTER A SINGLE FAMILY HOME WAS CONSTRUCTED ON THE LOT THAT HOME WAS RECENTLY DEMOLISHED AND THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REPLACE THAT HOME AT THE SAME 15 FOOT SETBACK AS RECORDED ON THE ORIGINAL PLAT. THIS PLANNING COMMISSION GRANTED A SIMILAR VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY DIRECTLY BEHIND THIS LOT TO ALLOW A 15 FOOT BUILDING LINE OF LAUNCH CHIMNEY ROCK. SIMILAR JUSTIFICATION FOR SUPPORTING THE REQUEST IS THAT THE 15 FOOT SETBACK IS VERY MUCH IN CHARACTER WITH THE SURROUNDING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, LAWN, CHIMNEY, ROCK, AND THE MAJORITY OF THE HOMES STILL SIT AT THE ORIGINAL PLATTED 15 FOOT BUILDING LINE. ALSO, THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE HOME WILL MEET THE 30 FOOT SETBACK ALONG EVERGREEN STREET AND THE DRIVEWAY IS OFF OF THE LOCAL STREET AND NOT THE MAJOR FAIR AIRFARE. THE NEW BACK CURB DISTANCE ALONG CHIMNEY ROCK ROAD IS OVER 25 FEET WITH SIX FOOT SIDEWALKS AND THE REQUIRE SAFETY BUFFER STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY OBJECTION TO THIS REQUEST AND RECOMMENDS GRANTING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAT VARIANCE, UH, AS SUBMITTED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION. MOTION BALLARD SECOND . ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. MOVING ON [IV. Establish a public hearing date of August 20, 2026 ] TO RAM NUMERAL FOUR. ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF AUGUST 20TH, 2026 FOR AZIZ VISTA. CHARLES MO STREET VIEWS GOMEZ BIG WOOD DEVELOPMENT, ST. AUGUSTINE PARK AND WHITE CHAPEL ESTATE. DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION GARZA. MOTION GARZA. SECOND HINES. SECOND HINES. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. MOVING TO ROMAN NUMERAL [V. Consideration of a Landscape Variance at 14421 Sommermeyer Street (Devin Crittle) ] FIVE, EXCUSE ME. ROMAN NUMERAL FIVE IS A LANDSCAPE VARIANCE FOR 1 4 4 2 SOMER MARE STREET. THE SITE IS LOCATED EAST OF GESNER ROAD AND SOUTH OF HEMPSTEAD ROAD, BOUNDED BY MEYER STREET, WINFERN ROAD AND TEAGUE ROAD. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A NEW WASTE TRANSFER STATION AND IS REQUESTING NOT TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED SCREENING. SHRUBS. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST. THE SITE CURRENTLY HOUSES A FACILITY WHERE TRASH IS TRANSFERRED FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COLLECTION VEHICLES TO 18 WHEELER TRUCKS FOR TRANSPORT TO LANDFILLS. THE FACILITY IS PROPOSED TO BE REPLACED, WHICH TRIGGERS THE COMPLIANCE WITH LANDSCAPING. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO MEET THE FULL STREET TREE AND PARKING LOT TREE REQUIREMENT, BUT REQUEST THE VARIANCE TO NOT PROVIDE THE SHRUBS DUE TO CONCERNS. THE SHRUBS WILL PROVIDE SHELTER TO PEST SUCH AS RACKS, RACCOONS, AND OTHER SMALL RODENTS AND WILL MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR, UH, CLEANUP SERVICES. THE PROPERTY SURROUNDED PRIMARILY BY INDUSTRIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL SITES AND THE WASTE TRANSFER STATION IS AN EXISTING USE. THE INTENT OF THE SHRUB REQUIREMENTS IS TO SCREEN PARKING AREAS FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY, BUT THE, EXCUSE ME, BUT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ONLY REQUIRES 10 PARKING SPACES AND 14 SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED. THE PROPOSED TREES AND GRASS WILL HELP IMPROVE THE OVERALL LOOK OF THE SITE. AND REMOVAL OF OVERGROWN VEGETATION WILL FACILITATE CLEANUP. THE CITY'S URBAN FORESTER GROUP HAS OFFERED A LETTER OF SUPPORT OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST AND DUE TO CONCERNS ABOUT PUBLIC HEALTH AND CLEANINGS, AS WELL AS THE SITE'S INDUSTRIAL LOCATION STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO SUPPORT THE REQUEST AND WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT TO, TO PLANT SCREENING SHRUBS. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. I DO HAVE A SPEAKER. DENISE V OR YE I CAN'T TELL. COULD GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS DENISE YI WITH RDLR ARCHITECTS. UM, I'M HELPING OUR OFFICE DESIGN THIS NEW WASTE TRANSFER STATION. UM, AND JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE Y'ALL, IF Y'ALL HAD ANY QUESTIONS, I WOULD BE HERE TO UH, ANSWER THEM. YES. YES. COMMISSIONER GARZA. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR. SO, UM, FIRST, AND YOU MAY OR MAY NOT BE ABLE TO, IT LOOKS IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST OF THIS. IT LOOKS LIKE A LARGE NEIGHBORHOOD. IS THAT INDUSTRIAL OR IS THAT, UH, RESIDENTIAL? DO YOU KNOW? THERE ARE SOME RESIDENTIAL, BUT IT'S MOSTLY COMMERCIAL. OKAY. THE REASON I ASK THAT QUESTION IS BECAUSE WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE, BECAUSE THERE'S A VARIANCE REQUEST HERE, I WANNA [01:20:01] MAKE SURE THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD SURROUNDING APPARENTLY TO THE WEST HAS A FENCING AND LIGHT SHIELDING SO THAT I DON'T KNOW IF THIS PLANT IS GONNA BE WORKING 24 7, BUT WE WANNA MAKE SURE THAT WE DON'T HAVE ANY LIGHT POLLUTION GOING INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO THAT WOULD BE, IN MY MIND, PART OF THIS VARIANCE REQUEST. WE WOULD REQUEST THAT YOU MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S SHIELDED LIGHTING SO IT'S NOT GOING ACROSS THE STREET INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. UM, AND THEN, UM, MR. CRIDDLE DON'T, DON'T LEAVE MS. Y, BUT MR. CRIDDLE FENCING REQUIREMENTS, I'D ALSO ASKED ABOUT AN EIGHT FOOT FENCE. YEAH. ON THAT LINE. THAT'S GONNA BE A STANDARD. YES, SIR. OKAY. AND THEN ONE MORE REQUEST. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE STANDARD IS FOR TREES EVERY 10 FEET, EVERY, I'D LIKE TO HAVE MORE TREES. . IF I CAN'T HAVE SHRUBS, I'D LIKE TO HAVE AS MANY TREES AS WE COULD POSSIBLY PUT IN THERE. OKAY. UH, AND THAT'S MORE OF A REQUEST THAN A DEMAND . SO WE ARE PROVIDING TREES ALREADY ALONG THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. . OKAY. THAT'S ENOUGH FOR ME. THERE'S NOT REALLY ANYMORE THAT WE CAN FIND . YEAH, THAT'S ENOUGH FOR ME. THAT'S MSHE, THAT'S PERFECTLY FINE. THAT'S ENOUGH FOR ME. SO I'LL JUST LEAVE IT AT LIGHTING. IF WE COULD MAKE SURE THAT THE LIGHTING, AT LEAST ON THE WEST SIDE, UH, UH, WHERE THERE MIGHT BE HOUSING WOULD BE SHIELDED TO, UH, TO KEEP BACK LIGHT POLLUTION FROM GOING INTO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT'S ALL NOTED. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER GARZA. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. SO WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION BY STAFF TO APPROVE. UH, DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION GARZA SECOND HINES. MOTION GARZA. SECOND HINES. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MR. SADIA. ARE WE READY TO GO BACK TO ITEM 93? YES, MA'AM. IN COORDINATION WITH THE APPLICANT, THEY ARE, UH, OR, AND THE PROPERTY OWNER, THEY ARE INSISTING ON MOVING WITH A UNRESTRICTED RESERVE. OKAY. OKAY. THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. SO WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED, WHICH DOES NOT REQUIRE, UH, MULTIFAMILY DESIGNATION. YES. A STATEMENT. COMMISSIONER GARZA AND I, I WANNA MAKE SURE THAT LEGAL'S LISTEN TO ME SO I DON'T OVERSTEP. UM, AND SO TO THE PEOPLE WHO ARE HERE FOR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD, I UNDERSTAND VERY MUCH I LIVE IN AN OLD NEIGHBORHOOD MYSELF. WE ARE RESTRICTED TO WHAT WE CAN DO BY THE RECOMMENDATIONS BY OUR LEGAL. I WOULD SAY TO YOU THAT YOU MIGHT PURSUE A LEGAL REMEDY OUTSIDE THE PURVIEW OF THIS COMMISSION. AND THAT'S ALL WE CAN SAY TODAY. WE ARE, WE WILL ENSURE WHAT THE CITY ORDINANCES ALLOW US TO DO, BUT WE CAN'T GO BEYOND THAT. SO AGAIN, UM, I DON'T WANNA OVERSTEP, BUT I THINK YOU MIGHT NEED TO GO TO, UH, ANOTHER FORUM TO GET, UM, THE RESPONSE THAT YOU WANT. SO THANK YOU AND I, I, WE SO APPRECIATE YOUR BEING HERE, YOUR VIGILANCE AND YOUR RESEARCH BECAUSE WE KNOW KEEPING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD INTACT IS A DIFFICULT THING AND WE SO APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT YOU'RE DOING THAT FOR YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER GARZA. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? OKAY. HEARING NONE. I NEED A MOTION FOR STAFF. RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. MOTION SIGLER. MOTION SIGLER. SECOND GARZA. SECOND GARZA. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OPPOSED? CAROL, PLEASE NOTE THAT COMMISSIONER CAR, UH, IS OPPOSED BALLARD. OPPOSED? AND, OKAY. WHO ELSE? NO, I HAVE A QUESTION. OKAY. BALLARD? OPPOSED? BALLARD IS OPPOSED. OKAY. I'LL DO THE OPPOSED IN A SECOND. YES. COMMISSIONER SIGLER. SO I'D LIKE LEGAL TO EXPLAIN IF IT'S A SHALL PRU HOW ARE COMMISSIONERS OPPOSING? OKAY. GOOD POINT. GOOD QUESTION. . MS. COOK, WOULD YOU LIKE TO ANSWER THAT PLEASE? I CAN'T EXPLAIN COMMISSIONER'S ACTIONS THERE. I, I, I SUSPECT THEY JUST WANT THEIR VOTE ON THE RECORD. MM-HMM . YES. THANK YOU. OKAY, WELL SAID. SO BY SHOW OF HANDS, I NEED TO KNOW WHO'S IN FAVOR. OKAY. ALL OPPOSED? OPPOSED. SO COMMISSIONER SYKES, COMMISSIONER BALLARD AND COMMISSIONER CAROL? NOT ON HOLD. FOUR. YOU'RE FOUR. OH, I'M SORRY. OKAY. OKAY. AND CAROL, DID YOU GET ALL OF THOSE? OKAY. OKAY, SO THE MOTION PASSES. PASSES? YES. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MOVING ON TO NUMERAL SIX. PUBLIC COMMENT. I DON'T HAVE ANYONE SIGNED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO MAKE ONE? OKAY. HEARING NONE. WE'LL ADJOURN THIS MEETING AT 3:57 PM THANK YOU EVERYONE. THANK YOU EVERYONE. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.