[00:00:01]
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, GOOD AFTERNOON, WELCOME HOUSTON PLANNING COMMISSION.[CALL TO ORDER]
I'LL NOW CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER.I AM, UH, SUNNY GARZA CHAIRING.
I'M CHAIRING TODAY THE HOUSTON PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AND I'M OFFICIALLY CALLING THIS MEETING TO ORDER AT 2 32 ON THURSDAY, THE 11TH OF JUNE, 2026.
THIS IS AN IN-PERSON MEETING TAKING PLACE IN THE CITY HALL ANNEX, UH, 900 BAGBY.
YOU MAY ALSO MONITOR THIS MEETING BY VIEWING VIA HTV.
UM, A LITTLE HOUSEKEEPING BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD.
UM, IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON AN ITEM, PLEASE FILL OUT THE SPEAKER'S FORM BEFORE THE ITEM IS CALLED.
IT LOOKS LIKE THIS WATCHER PENMANSHIP.
I'M REALLY BAD AT IT, SO, UM, AND TURNED IT INTO THE STAFF OVER HERE BY THE DOORS.
CONSENT AND REPEAT, UH, REPEAT SPEAKERS ARE ALLOWED.
JUST SO YOU KNOW, THE SPEAKER SIGN UP FORM THE INFORMATION IS HERE ON THE BACK OF THE FORM.
COUNCIL MEMBERS, UH, SPEAKING FOR THEIR CONSTITUENTS ARE NOT TIMED.
APPLICANTS HAVE THEIR ALLOTTED TWO MINUTE TIME AS WELL AS REBUTTALS.
NON APPLICANTS AND GENERAL SPEAKERS ARE ALLOWED TWO MINUTES.
UM, THERE IS NOT AN OPTION FOR REBUTTAL, EVEN IF YOU DID NOT USE YOUR FULL TWO MINUTE TIME.
SO WITH THAT SAID, TO ESTABLISH A QUORUM, I WILL GO AHEAD AND CALL THE ROLE.
THE CHAIR, LISA CLARK, WILL NOT BE PRESENT TODAY.
UH, VICE CHAIR SONNY GARZA IS PRESENT.
UH, COMMISSIONER BALDWIN PRESENT, UH, COMMISSIONER BALLARD PRESENT, COMMISSIONER CARROLL PRESENT, COMMISSIONER HEIS WILL NOT BE IN ATTENDANCE TODAY.
COMMISSIONER HINES IS NOT IN ATTENDANCE.
UH, COMMISSIONER MAREZ PRESENT.
UH, COMMISSIONER FAM WILL NOT BE PRESENT TODAY.
UH, COMMISSIONER PIERCE IS NOT HERE.
UH, COMMISSIONER SARRE PRESENT IS HERE.
UH, COMMISSIONER SHEPHERD WILL NOT BE IN ATTENDANCE TODAY.
UH, COMMISSIONER VITER VICTOR IS PRESENT.
UM, AND COMMISSIONER, UH, AKA PRESENT IS PRESENT.
AND WHO AM I MISSING AND SECRETARY V TRAN.
COMMISSIONER PIERCE PIERCE EXACTLY HAS JUST ARRIVED.
AND COMMISSIONER POR PERTS ALSO NEAR.
OH, AND POR PER, I DIDN'T CALL YOU.
BURT, I JUST, I'M A LITTLE NERVOUS.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.
ALRIGHT, THAT DONE? UM, WE WILL NOW MOVE ON TO
[Director’s Report]
THE, UH, DIRECTOR'S REPORT.VICE CHAIR OF SUNNY GARZA COMMISSION MEMBERS, STAFF AND THE PUBLIC.
I AM VON TRAN, SECRETARY OF THIS COMMISSION AND DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
I HAVE ONLY ONE ITEM TO REPORT TODAY, OUR OFFICE HOSTED THE 2026 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND FREEWAY PLAN AMENDMENT VIRTUAL OPEN HOUSE YESTERDAY EVENING.
THIS MEETING ALLOWED THE APPLICANTS TO SHOWCASE THEIR PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE PUBLIC WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF.
WE HAD SEVERAL DOZEN ATTENDEES AND A LIVELY DISCUSSION ON THE AMENDMENT REQUESTS.
THE NEXT STEP IN THE AMENDMENT PROCESS WILL BE A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THURSDAY, JULY 23RD AT 1:00 PM IN THIS CHAMBER.
IN CLOSING FOR ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT 8 3 2 3 9 3 6 6 0 0 TO REACH THE PLANNER OF THE DAY, CALL 8 3 2 3 9 3 6 6 2 4.
YOU MAY VISIT US ONLINE@HOUSTONPLANNING.COM.
ALRIGHT, ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS AT ALL BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD? ALL RIGHT.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, BEFORE WE BEGIN THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN WITHDRAWN AND WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED TODAY, AND THEY ARE ITEMS 69 70 85 AND 1 0 3.
AGAIN, THEY WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED TODAY.
NOW, ON THE SIDE I WANT TO MENTION I HAVE TWO PEOPLE WHO HAVE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ITEM 69.
ARE YOU HERE? ALRIGHT, SO YOUR OPTION IS, AGAIN, THIS ITEM IS NOT GONNA BE CONSIDERED TODAY.
YOU WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK IF YOU CHOOSE TO STAY TILL THE END FOR, UH, FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
UH, IF AND WHEN THIS COMES UP, IT WILL COME UP AGAIN ON THE AGENDA AND YOU'LL, YOU'LL BE NOTIFIED THAT IT'S COMING UP AGAIN.
SO, UM, AGAIN, IT'S TOTALLY UP TO YOU.
IF YOU WANNA SPEAK TODAY ON ITEM 69, YOU CAN WAIT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AT, AT THE END OF THE MEETING.
[00:05:01]
ALRIGHT, UH, WITH THAT[Consideration of May 28, 2026, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes ]
WE WILL MOVE FORWARD TO, UM, CONSIDERATION OF THE MAY 28TH, 2026 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES.UM, THERE IN YOUR PACKET, UH, COMMISSIONERS, IF THERE ARE NO CHANGES OR CORRECTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? MOTION SYKES SYKES.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED? OKAY, HEARING NONE THE MOTION PASSES.
UH, IF YOU WOULD MAKE A NOTE THAT COMMISSIONER JONES HAS ARRIVED RIGHT HERE, BUT YES, I STEPPED BACK.
I CAN'T KEEP TRACK OF EVERYTHING.
[Platting Activities a & b]
MOVE ON TO, UH, ROMAN NUMERAL ONE, PLATING ACTIVITY A AND B.GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
SECTIONS A AND B ARE PRESENTED AS ONE GROUP, WHICH INCLUDES CONSENT AND REPL.
ITEMS NOT REQUIRING NOTIFICATION.
SECTIONS A AND B ARE ITEMS ONE THROUGH 64 SECTION A.
CONSENT ITEMS ARE NUMBERS ONE THROUGH 33 AND SECTION B REPL ITEMS ARE NUMBERS 34 THROUGH 64.
NO ITEMS NEED TO BE TAKEN OUTTA ORDER AND THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO STAFF.
RECOMMENDATIONS MR. CHAIR, IF THERE ARE NO INDIVIDUALS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THESE ITEMS, THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUEST THE APPROVAL OF ALL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSENT AND REPLAY ITEMS NOT REQUIRING NOTIFICATION.
UM, COMMISSIONERS ITEMS FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION.
ON UH, SECTION A 7 20 28, 29, 30 AND ON SECTION B 60.
ANYONE ELSE? ALRIGHT, WE ARE GONNA BE LOOKING AT ITEMS VOTING ON ITEMS ONE THROUGH 64.
SAVE AND ACCEPT 7 20 28 THROUGH 30 AND 60.
IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, IS THERE UM, A MOTION? MOTION? VICTOR, VICTOR, SECOND MAD.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
ALRIGHT AND AT THIS POINT, UM, SINCE WE HAVE NO SPEAKERS, I WILL, WE'LL NOW VOTE ON, UH, ITEM 7, 20 20 THROUGH 30 AND 60.
IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION POROUS.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE THE MOTION PASSES.
[c. Replats requiring Public Hearings with Notification (Aracely Rodriguez, John Cedillo, Ken Calhoun, and Dorianne Powe-Phlegm) ]
ON TO C REPL REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARINGS.MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
MY LIMIT AT ELLI RODRIGUEZ ADAM 65 CHARLOTTES MONT PLACE.
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT SOUTH OF PARKER PARKER ROAD AND EAST OF NORTHWEST SIDE DRIVE.
THE PURPOSE OF THE WE PLA IS TO CREATE THREE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT.
NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED.
WITH THIS ITEM, THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATE THAT THE PLOT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTION ON THE FACE OF THE PLA OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY.
STAFF DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS IN ADVANCE.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBSTITUTE THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITION.
MR. CHAIR, IT'S APPRECIATE THE COMMISSION.
YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 65, CHARLES MONT PLACE IS OPEN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? SEEING NONE WILL MOVE ON.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO REP APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS? IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION BOLDMAN SECOND.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
THE S SIDE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT WITH OF SCOTCH STREET AND SOUTH OF WEED ROAD.
THE PURPOSE OF THE WEED PLA IS TO CREATE ONE MULTI-UNIT RESERVE.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARI TO SECTION 180 3 TO CONVERT ONE LOT INTO THE MUR RESERVE STAFF.
RECOMMEND TO THE PLOT ADDITIONAL TIME IF NEEDED TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE A LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM THE ADJOINING LOT.
THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND STAFF DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS IN EVENTS.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THE PLOT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
MR. CHAIR PLEASE THE COMMISSION YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 66 CULVER RESIDENCES IS OPEN.
[00:10:01]
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? SEEING NONE WILL MOVE ON.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO DEFER THIS ITEM AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION TO DEFER JONES? JONES? SECOND CAROL.
CAROL ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT SOUTH OF BELFOR STREET AND EAST OF SCOTCH STREET.
THE PURPOSE OF THE WE PLOT IS TO CREATE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT.
NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM.
THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATE THAT THE PLOT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTION ON THE FACE OF THE PLOT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY.
STAFF DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS IN ADVANCE.
THAT RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLA SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITION.
MR. CHAIR, IF THE PLEASE OF THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 67 DAVENPORT MANOR IS OPEN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS, QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF? UH, APPROVAL? NO.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED THE MOTION PASSES.
GOOD AFTERNOON MR. CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
ITEM 68 IS FMU KAYWOOD COLLECTION.
THE SEPTIC SITE IS AN OVER 10,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CITY LIMITS EAST OF ANTOINE DRIVE AND NORTH OF WESTVIEW DRIVE.
THE REASON FOR REPL IS TO CREATE FOUR LOTS ON A SHARED DRIVEWAY.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS.
THIS IS A RELA OF LOT ONE AND BLOCK THREE OF PINE TERRACE.
STAFF HAS RECEIVED ADVANCED COMMENTS REGARDING CONCERNS OVER DEED RESTRICTIONS ON THE PROPERTY REVIEW.
BY LEGAL INDICATES THE PROPOSED PLAT DOES VIOLATE SEPARATELY FILED DEED RESTRICTIONS, UH, REGARDING BUILDING LINES AND LOT SIZE.
THE APPLICATION WAS DEFERRED LAST CYCLE TO PER PUBLIC PER APPLICANT REQUEST TO COORDINATE WITH LEGAL STAFF.
RECOMMENDATION IS TO AGAIN, TO AGAIN DEFER THE PLAT FOR TWO WEEKS PER APPLICANT REQUEST TO ALLOW FURTHER COORDINATION WITH LEGAL, UH, TO POTENTIALLY COME INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE RESTRICTIONS.
MR. CHAIR FOR PLEASE THE COMMISSION.
YOU MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
UH, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CONTINUED ON ITEM 68.
UM, I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? SEEING NONE WILL MOVE ON.
WE'VE GOT A STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR DEFERRAL.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION TO DEFER MOTION SIGLER SIGLER SECOND NA.
ALRIGHT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
THIS ITEM IS DEFERRED ALONG WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ITEMS 69 AND 70 HAVE BEEN WITHDRAWN.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS AN OVER 11,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CITY LIMITS AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF MADERA ROAD AND LEE ROAD NORTH OF TIDWELL AND EAST OF MESA DRIVE.
THE REASON FOR RELA IS TO CREATE TWO LOTS ON A SHARED DRIVEWAY.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCES VARIANCES REQUEST WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ON NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
THIS IS A REPLAT OF LOT ONE 16 BLOCK FIVE OF KENT SHIRE PLACE SECTION ONE.
THE ITEM WAS POSTED IN THE AGENDA BUT THE ITEMS PACKET WAS MISSING FROM THE FULL AGENDA PACKET.
THEREFORE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THE PLAT FOR TWO WEEKS TO PROVIDE THE FULL PACKET IN THE FOLLOWING AGENDA.
MR. CHAIR, IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 71 IS OPEN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? WE HAVE A STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO DEFER AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR TWO WEEKS.
UM, AS SUCH, IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION MOTION BALDWIN BALDWIN.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
THIS ITEM IS DEFERRED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED.
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT NORTH ALL ALONG RICHMOND AVENUE AND WEST OF FOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE.
THE PURPOSE OF THE WE PLA IS TO CREATE ONE UNRESTRICTED RESERVE.
NO VARIANCES ARE ARE BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM.
THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL WILL INDICATE THAT THE PLOT WILL
[00:15:01]
NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTION ON THE FACE OF THE PLOT, ALTHOUGH FILED SEPARATELY.STAFF DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT IN ADVANCE.
THAT RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLA SUBJECT TO THE CCPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITION.
MR. CHAIR, IF YOU PLEASE WITH THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS OPEN ON ITEM 72 ROYAL PLAZA.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? HEARING NONE.
I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS LISTED.
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? MOTION.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
WOODLAND ACRES PARK TWO VLA NUMBER FIVE.
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT SOUTH OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 10 AND EAST OF FEDERAL ROAD.
THE PURPOSE OF THE VLA IS TO CREATE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LODGE.
NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION.
REQUIREMENT REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATE THAT THE PROPOSED LOT ARE SUBJECT TO A MINIMUM 25 FEET FROM BORDERLINE WITH FIVE FEET SITE BORDERLINE PER APPLICABLE DEBT RESTRICTION THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED A REVISED SUBDIVISION PLAT MEETING THIS APPLICABLE RESTRICTION WHICH NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTION ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATE SEPARATELY.
STAFF DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT IN ADVANCE.
AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBSTITUTE THE CCP C 1 0 1 INFORMED CONDITION.
MR. CHAIR IS TO PLEASE THE COMMISSION.
YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 73, WOODLAND ACRES PARTIAL REPL NUMBER FIVE IS OPEN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? ALRIGHT, HEARING NONE I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF FOR APPROVAL.
IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS, IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION SI.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
[d. Subdivision Plats with Variance Requests (John Cedillo, Devin Crittle, Petra Hsia, Tammi Williamson, and Geoff Butler) ]
D SUBDIVISION PLATS WITH VARIANCE REQUEST.ITEM 74 IS FM 5 29 ELRIDGE BUSINESS PARK.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS AN OVER 10 AND A HALF ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HARRIS COUNTY EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION SOUTH ALONG FM 5 29 AND WEST OF ELDRIDGE PARKWAY.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A SINGLE UNRESTRICTED RESERVE AND IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO NOT PROVIDE A NORTH SOUTH STREET THROUGH THE SITE.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST.
THE SITE IS CURRENTLY USED FOR WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION AND OFFICE AND INTENDS TO CREATE TWO ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES.
UH, IN LINE WITH THAT USE TO THE SOUTH IS A RESIDENTIAL TRAILER COMMUNITY, WHICH TAKES ACCESS FROM THE DEAD END STREET OF WAYMAN ROAD.
FURTHER SOUTH IS THE ATIX FAIRBANKS LANDFILL, THE DRILL QUIP, RECORDED PLAT AND THE EXIT SOUTH RECORDED PLAT WHICH ALLOW NO FURTHER CONTINUATION TO THE SOUTH.
THE HORSE PIN CREEK TO THE WEST, UH, ALLOWS NO FURTHER CONNECTION TO THE WEST EITHER.
SO ANY TRAFFIC THAT WOULD GO THROUGH THE SITE WOULD BE ROUTED BACK TO ELDRIDGE PARKWAY.
UM, UH, THROUGH WHICH FM 29 DIRECTLY CONNECTS, UH, FM 5 29.
HARRIS COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE VARIANCE REQUESTS.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUEST OF VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
MR. CHAIR, THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION.
UH, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM 74 FM 5 29 ELDRIDGE BUSINESS PARK.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WANTING TO SPEAK? NO.
UH, WE'VE GOT A RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT.
I AM UM, I'M OLD AND MY HEARING IS GOING.
SO YOU MIGHT HAVE TO HAVE A EACH, LIKE A DIFFERENT COLORED FLAG IN MEETINGS TO COME JUST SO THAT YOU KNOW YAHOO.
UH, IF NO, UH, WE'VE GOT A MOTION AND A SECOND.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
ITEM 75 AND 76 WILL LIKE TO BE TAKEN AS ONE ITEM BEING GRANT ME GRANT MASON GENERAL PLAN AND GRAND MASON DETENTION RESERVE A, THE GENERAL PLAN AND DETENTION RESERVE ARE 1100 ACRES AND 14 ACRES RESPECTIVELY LOCATED IN HARRIS COUNTY, EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION EAST ALONG 99 GRAND PARKWAY AND SOUTH OF WEST ROAD.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A GENERAL PLAN INTENDED FOR SINGLE FILING DEVELOPMENT ALONG WITH AMENITIES AND DRAINAGE AND DETENTION.
THEY'RE REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO NOT EXTEND NOR TERMINATE WITH THE CUL-DE-SAC STOCK DECK SCHOOL ROAD ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY.
THE EASTERN HALF OF THE RIGHT OF WAY STUBS INTO THE G BOUNDARY WHILE THE WESTERN HALF STUBS INTO PRIVATELY OWNED LOTS SHOWN IN ORANGE.
STOCK DECK SCHOOL ROAD CURRENTLY EXISTS AS A DIRT TRAIL THAT GIVES MAINTENANCE ACCESS TO THE PIPELINE AND CENTER POINT POWER LINE,
[00:20:01]
UH, CORRIDOR THAT INTERSECT THE RIGHT OF WAY.THE APPLICANT HAS DISCOVERED DISCREPANCIES IN LEGAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE STATUS OF STOCKDALE SCHOOL ROAD AND WHETHER IT IS PUBLICLY DEDICATED IN PART OR IN FULL.
THEREFORE, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THE PLAT FOR TWO WEEKS PER APPLICANT REQUEST TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO COORDINATE WITH HARRIS COUNTY ENGINEERING TO CONFIRM RIGHT OF WAY INFORMATION UPON THE DEFERRAL GRAND MASON DETENTION RESERVE.
A WOULD REQUIRE DEFERRAL BUT HAS BEEN DEFERRED TWICE AND MUST BE DISAPPROVED.
HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED IN WRITING A REQUEST FOR A 30 DAY EXTENSION AND IS PRESENT TO MAKE THAT REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION TODAY.
MR. UH, MR. CHAIR, THIS CONCLUDES TASK PRESENTATION.
ACTUALLY I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED.
DID YOU NOT SAY 75 AND 77 WHEN WE STARTED? 75 AND 76.
SO, UM, I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
SO LADIES AND GENTLEMEN WE'RE ON 75 AND 76 GRAND MASON GP AND DETENTION RESERVE NUMBER, UH, RESERVE A UH, HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED FOR DEFERRAL AT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST.
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? ALRIGHT, HEARING NONE.
UH, WE AGAIN, WE HAVE A MOTION FOR DEFERRAL.
UM, TWO WEEKS AND THEN 30 DAYS.
ALRIGHT, SO QUESTIONS, COMMENTS.
IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION? AK AKKA.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED THE MOTION PASSES.
NOW 77 HOUSTON OFFICE BILL OUT THAT IT WOULD BE NOW FOR 76 FOR THE THIRD DAY SEARCHING 'CAUSE IT MUST BE HEARD FROM THE APPLICANT REQUEST.
OH, IT MUST BE DONE SEPARATELY.
IT MUST BE HEARD AS A REQUEST FROM THE APPLICANT.
OKAY, SO WE HAVE THE DEFERRAL.
WE JUST VOTED ON THE DEFERRAL.
ARE WE GOOD WITH THAT VOTE BEING ONLY FOR 75? YES.
OKAY, SO WE WILL NOW VOTE ON 76, WHICH IS THE 30 DAYS.
AND SO, UH, QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ABOUT THE 30 DAY EXTENSION? IT MUST BE HEARD FROM THE APPLICANT HAS A REQUEST TO THE COMMISSION.
I KNOW THAT TE PESKY STATE LAW GETS IN MY CAR EVERY TIME.
UM, GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIR.
MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
UH, MY NAME IS GRACE SKA WITH BGE.
I'M THE APPLICANT AND I WOULD LIKE TO FORMALLY REQUEST, UM, THE 30 DAY EXTENSION.
AND THAT WILL BE ON PAPER TO STAFF.
ALRIGHT, QUESTIONS FOR OUR APPLICANT, KENT.
ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.
HEARING NONE, WE'LL MOVE ON TO, UH, AGAIN, ITEM 76, THE DETENTION RESERVE, THE 30 DAY EXTENSION.
IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION? PA MYAKKA SECOND BALDWIN BALDWIN.
OKAY, WE'LL GET THERE EVENTUALLY.
OKAY, NOW ITEM SEVEN, HOUSTON OFFICE FILLED OUT.
THE SUBJECT SIDE IS A 1.4 ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HARRIS COUNTY, EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION SOUTH OF TANON ROAD AND WEST OF GASNER ROAD.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING ONE UNRESTRICTED RESERVE AND IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW AN UNRESTRICTED RESERVE TO TAKE ACCESS VIA AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN LIEU OF PUBLIX.
RE FRONTAGE STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST.
THE SITE IS A LANDLOCKED PROPERTY THAT CURRENTLY TAKES ACCESS VIA AN EXISTING 60 FOOT WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT.
THE SITE INTENDS TO MAKE UPDATES TO THE EXISTING BUILDING THAT REQUIRES PERMITTING AND THUS PLATTING OF THE SITE.
IN 2023, THE SITE TO THE IMMEDIATE WEST CLARA ROAD INDUSTRIAL PARK WAS GRANTED A VARIANCE IN NOT PROVIDING EAST WEST STREET TO THE SITE.
THIS LIMITS POTENTIAL ACCESS FOR THE SUBJECT SITE OUTSIDE OF THE EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT.
UH, HARRIS COUNTY ENGINEERING IS IN SUPPORT OF THE VARIANCES.
RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUEST OF VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CPC 1 0 1 FOR CONDITIONS.
SENIOR CHAIR, THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION.
BUILD OUT WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
ANYONE WANTS TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.
ALRIGHT, HEARING THAT QUESTIONS, COMMENTS? UM, IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION? MAD AKKA SECOND JONES.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE HOUSTON PLANNING COMMISSION.
ITEM 78 IS MARKET STREET LIFT STATION NUMBER TWO.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS SOUTH OF MARKET STREET AND WEST OF HAYDEN ROAD.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A LIFT STATION TO TAKE ACCESS FROM AN, EXCUSE ME, TO ALLOW A LIFT STATION TO TAKE ACCESS FROM AN EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AS REQUIRED BY THE ORDINANCE.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST.
THE SITE IS AN EXISTING 30 BY 30 FOOT LIFT STATION CREATED BY THE VALDI CENTER SUBDIVISION PLAT IN 1985.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT APPLICATION IS TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF THE LIFT STATION TO BETTER ACCOMMODATE UTILITY SERVICES IN THE AREA.
THE UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THIS REQUEST IS THAT THE RECORDED PLAT DEDICATED A 60 FOOT ACCESS
[00:25:01]
EASEMENT WITH THE INTENT OF PROVIDING ACCESS TO THE LIFT STATION.THE LIFT STATION IS LOCATED IN THE REAR OF A PAVED COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT AWAY FROM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
STAFF SUPPORTS THIS REQUEST AS THE ALT THE ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF PROVIDING SUFFICIENT ACCESS TO THE LIFT STATION ALREADY EXISTS.
STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY OBJECTION TO THIS REQUEST, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS GRANTING THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVING THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
AGAIN, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM 78 MARKET STREET, LIFT STATION NUMBER TWO.
UH, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHICH IS TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? NO.
ALRIGHT, WITH THAT, UM, QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? IS THERE A MOTION, MOTION NOT ON NARANJO AND BALLARD, CORRECT.
NARANJO AND BALLARD FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
UH, THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE ACRES HOMES AREA IN THE CITY LIMITS, UH, SOUTH OF LITTLE YORK ROAD AND EAST OF CARVER ROAD.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE DEDICATION OVER A 40 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 50 FEET.
AND TO ALLOW A MINIMUM INTERSECTION SPACING LESS THAN 75 FEET.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 51 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ALONG A SERIES OF SHARED DRIVEWAYS.
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE ACRES HOME MOBILITY STUDY AREA.
THE INTENT OF THE MOBILITY STUDY WAS TO ANALYZE TRAFFIC NEEDS IN THE AREA AND IDENTIFY VALUABLE STREET CONNECTIONS TO IMPROVE CONNECTIVITY.
THIS PROPERTY WAS IDENTIFIED AS A DESIRABLE STREET EXTENSION OF BETHUNE DRIVE TO WILBER BEFORE STREET.
THE APPLICANT IS MAKING THE NECESSARY CONNECTION AS INDICATED ON THE MOBILITY STUDY.
CHAPTER 42 REQUIRES LOCAL STREETS TO BE, EXCUSE ME, CHAPTER 42 REQUIRES LOCAL STREETS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET WIDE ENTER CENTER LINE TIED WITH AN EXISTING STREET OR SEPARATE THE INTERSECTION BY AT LEAST 75 FEET.
JUSTIFICATION FOR SUPPORTING THE FOUR FOOT RIGHT OF WAY IS A COMPROMISE FOR THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY STREET EXTENSION WHILE ALSO PROVIDING ENOUGH ROOM FOR 10 FOOT TRAVEL LANES, FIVE FOOT SIDEWALKS AND SAFETY BUFFERS ON EACH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.
DUE TO THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY, THE APPLICANT PHYSICALLY CANNOT MAKE THE CENTER LINE TIE WITH SEBER STREET SOUTH OF WEBER BEFORE STREET HOUSTON PUBLIC WORKS IS AWARE OF THIS PROPOSED INTERSECTION AND WILL EXPLORE TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES ONCE THE PROJECT GETS TO THE PERMITTING STAGE IF NECESSARY.
STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY OBJECTION TO THIS REQUEST AND RECOMMENDS GRANTING THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVING THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CCPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE ON ITEM 79 MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCES AND APPROVE THE PLAT.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? HEARING NONE.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? JUST CURIOUS.
BETHUNE STREET, WHAT IS THE RIGHT OF WAY THERE? IS IT 40 FEET OR? WELL, IT'S 50 FEET ABOVE.
EXCUSE ME, IT'S 50 FEET NORTH OF THIS SITE.
I'D LIKE TO ADD IT IS SEPARATED BY, UM, AQUILA.
DO YOU MIND GOING TO THE EXHIBIT THAT SHOWS THE DRAINAGE DITCH TO THE NORTH? SO THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY TO THE NORTH IS SEPARATED BY A 20 FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
UM, IT'S LIKELY TO BE PAVED OVER, BUT THAT'S MORE OF A PUBLIC WORKS KIND OF CONSIDERATION, BUT IT WOULD BE A TRANSITION FROM 50 DOWN TO 40, BUT IT WILL CONNECT.
THE INTENT IS FOR IT TO CONNECT.
UM, I DON'T WANNA SPEAK TOO MUCH FOR, FOR PUBLIC WORKS, HOW THAT, HOW THE CONSTRUCTION IS GONNA BE OVER A DRAINAGE DITCH, BUT THERE ARE OTHER EXAMPLES OF STREETS CROSSING THIS SAME DRAINAGE DITCH.
SO WE KNOW IT'S, IT'S POSSIBLE FOR SURE.
AND MR. K CRILE WE'VE APPROVED 40 FOOT RIGHT OF WAYS? YES SIR.
ANYONE ELSE? BAREZ? YEAH, I MEAN RESPECTFULLY, I'M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW THIS ISN'T A SELF, UM, INFLICTED, INFLICTED HARDSHIP LIKE I MEAN PHYSICALLY THERE ANY REASON OTHER THAN THEIR PROPOSAL THAT WE CAN'T GET A 50 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE HAVE A ROAD EXTENSION TO THE NORTH AT THAT SAME WIDTH
UM, SO THIS SITE IS WITHIN THE ACRES HOME MOBILITY STUDY, UH, AREA.
UM, THIS AREA IS LACKING A LOT OF STREET CONNECTIONS, SO, UM, A COMPROMISE TO HELP
[00:30:01]
WITH THE DEDICATION TO MAKE SURE WE ACTUALLY GET THE STREETS.UM, WE LOOKED AT DIFFERENT OPTIONS FOR, UH, REDUCED RIGHT OF WAYS.
UM, WE DON'T ALWAYS HAVE THE ABILITY TO GET THE 50 FOOT RIGHT OF WAYS.
SO WE DID COME UP WITH DIFFERENT OPTIONS, UH, IN THIS SCENARIO BECAUSE I THINK GETTING THE STREET WAS MORE, WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING.
UM, AND EVEN WITHIN THAT RIGHT OF WAY, WE CAN STILL GET THE NECESSARY TRAVEL LANES AND, AND SIDEWALKS.
UH, SO THIS IS A, A COMMON REQUEST AND SPECIFICALLY IN THE ACRES HOME MOBILITY STUDY AREA.
UM, LET ME ASK A QUESTION, MR. CRILE.
I WAS JUST ASKING THE DIRECTOR, AM I RECALLING THAT THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR WAS SUPPOSED TO DEDICATE SOME RIGHT OF WAY AND COULD NOT, OR WOULD NOT OR SOMETHING I DON'T REMEMBER AND IT WASN'T, IT WASN'T VIABLE AT THIS POINT IN TIME AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE GOING WITH THE 40 VERSUS YES, THAT'S A, THAT'S A GOOD COMMENT.
UH, AQUILA GO TO, YEAH, SO, UH, THE DASH LINE YOU SEE IN PURPLE, TECHNICALLY THIS RIGHT OF WAY PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAVE WOULD BE WITHIN THIS PLAT BOUNDARY.
AND IF WE WERE TO MAKE IT 50 FEET, MAYBE 10 TO 15 FEET WOULD HAVE TO COME FROM THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES AND IT'D BE, IT WOULD BE SOME TIME BEFORE WE ACTUALLY GET THE FULL DEDICATION.
IT WOULD REQUIRE ALL OF THOSE ADJACENT TRACKS TO PLAID AND OKAY.
THAT, THAT KIND OF EXPLAINS IT BETTER.
SINCE WE COULD DO ONE OR WE COULD TOGETHER OR, YEAH, SO, OKAY.
ALL RIGHT, MORE QUESTIONS, COMMENTS COMMISSIONER BALDWIN, DID YOU HAVE SOME? I'M OKAY.
SO AGAIN, WE'RE ON ITEM 79, MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO UM, ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS ITEM? OKAY, SO WE'VE GOT A RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED.
THERE'S NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.
IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MODEST SECOND SIGLER.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIRMAN GARZA AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
ITEM 80 IS NORTH HOUSTON COMMERCE PARK GP.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE HOUSTON ETJ HARRIS COUNTY NORTH ALONG FM 1960 EAST OF EAST ROAD AND WEST OF RAYFORD ROAD.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A GENERAL PLAN AND IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED MAXIMUM LOCAL INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG THE NORTHWEST AND NORTHEAST BOUNDARIES AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE STREET INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF FM 1960 BY NOT PROVIDING STREETS THROUGH THE PROPERTY, STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST.
THE SITE IS PROPOSED FOR INDUSTRIAL USE INCLUDING A WAREHOUSE CAR AND TRUCK PARKING AND A DETENTION AREA ON THE EAST SIDE.
ADJACENT TO THE NORTHEASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE ARE OGDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WHICH IS PART OF THE RECORDED RAYFORD INTERMEDIATE SUBDIVISION, MCRI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND NORTH AIRPORT LOGISTICS CENTER.
A SUBDIVISION CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF BEING RECORDED A VARIANCE WAS GRANTED TO NORTH AIRPORT LOGISTICS CENTER TO ALLOW AN EXCESSIVE INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG RAYFORD ROAD BY NOT BY ELIMINATING THEIR REQUIREMENT FOR AN EAST WEST STREET CONNECTION THROUGH THE PROPERTY.
GIVEN THESE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND APPROVED CONSTRAINTS REQUIRING A STREET CONNECTION TO THE NORTHEAST WOULD BE INFEASIBLE.
ADJACENT TO THE NORTHWESTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE ARE SEVERAL LARGE ACRE UNRECORDED SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES AND AN UNRECORDED SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION NEAR OGDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REQUIRING A STREET CONNECTION TO THESE ROAD WOULD INTRODUCE INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC INTO A RESIDENTIAL AREA IN SCHOOL ZONE.
HARRIS COUNTY HAS NO OBJECTIONS.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE GENERAL PLAN SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
UH, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM 80 NORTH HOUSTON COMMERCE PARK, GP.
UM, I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? ALRIGHT, SEEING NONE WILL MOVE FORWARD.
UM, COMMISSIONERS, UH, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? MOTION AK MANAK.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
ITEM 81 IS POUND BERRY SECTION TWO.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS HARRIS COUNTY, SOUTH OF HOLMES ROAD AND WEST ALONG FANON STREET.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 301 LOTS AND SEVEN RESERVES RESTRICTED TO COMPENSATING OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AND OPEN SPACE AND IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW SELECT LOTS TO HAVE FRONTAGE AND ACCESS FROM A PRIVATE ALLEY.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THE
[00:35:01]
PLOT TO GIVE THE APPLICANT TIME TO PROVIDE REVISED MATERIALS AND NEW DRAWINGS.THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
UM, I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON ITEM 81.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? ALRIGHT, SEEING NONE, WE'LL MOVE FORWARD.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO DEFER ITEM 81 POUNDBURY SECTION TWO FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION BALLARD, BALLARD, BALDWIN.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE HOUSTON PLANNING COMMISSION.
THIS ITEM WAS DEFERRED AT THE PREVIOUS COMMISSION MEETING, UH, SALINAS ESTATES AT SHARON STREET.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON'S CORPORATE LIMIT ALONG WACO STREET NORTH OF CLINTON DRIVE IN SOUTH OF THE EAST FREEWAY.
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TWO SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ACCESSED BY A SHARED DRIVEWAY.
THE APPLICANT INITIALLY REQUESTED VARIANCES TO ALLOW FOR REDUCED BUILDING LINES ALONG WACO AND TO ALLOW FOR FIVE FEET OF DEDICATION TO SHARON STREET, A 28 FOOT WIDE LOCAL STREET.
THE APPLICANT HAS REVISED THEIR APPLICATION IS REQUESTING THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES, ONE TO ALLOW FOR A 12 FOOT BUILDING LINE ALONG WACO AS OPPOSED TO REQUIRED 25 FOR MAJOR THOROUGHFARES.
TWO TO ALLOW FOR A ZERO FOOT BUILDING LINE ALONG SHARON STREET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED FIVE AND THREE TO ALLOW NO VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT THE INTERSECTION OF WACO AND SHARON, THE STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THESE REQUESTS.
THE SITE IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF WACO AND SHARON NORTHEAST OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON.
WACO IS A HUNDRED FOOT RIGHT AWAY FEATURING TWO VEHICLE LANES, THREE FOOT MULTI-USE PATHS SEPARATED BY A LARGE MEDIAN.
THE NEIGHBORHOOD WAS PLATTED IN 1911 AND THE SUBJECT TRACK WAS ORIGINALLY A PAIR OF 50 FOOT INTERIOR LOTS ON A 25 FOOT STREET.
WACO STREET WAS EVENTUALLY WIDENED AND RAIL ALIGNED TO ITS CURRENT CONDITION RESULTING IN THE SUBJECT TRACK BECOMING A CORNER LOT.
THIS RECONFIGURATION INCLUDES A 14 FOOT CORNER CUTBACK ALLOWING FOR OPTIMAL VISIBILITY AT THIS INTERSECTION.
PER CHAPTER 42, THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO DEDICATE 12 AND A HALF FEET OF SHARON TO BRING IT TO THE REQUIRED 50 FOOT WIDTH.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING VARIANCES FROM THE SETBACK AND VISIBILITY TRIANGLE REQUIREMENTS CITING THE RELATIVELY LARGE DISPLACEMENT OF DEVELOPABLE LAND.
CHAPTER 42 ALLOWS FOR REDUCED SETBACKS FOR CORNER LOTS WITH SINGLE FAMILY HOMES UTILIZING A SHARED DRIVEWAY.
THE SITE DOES NOT TECHNICALLY QUALIFY BEING PLATTED AS AN INTERIOR LOT, BUT THE RESULT IS SIMILAR.
IN ADDITION, THE EXISTING CURB CUTS AND PA OR CURBS AND PAVING WERE BUILT ACCOUNTING FOR THE CUTBACK, DEDICATION AND NARROW WIDTH OF SHARON STREET.
EVEN WITH A ZERO FOOT BUILDING LINE, THE PROPOSED DEDICATION WOULD SET THE PROPERTY BACK 12 AND A HALF FEET FROM THE CUTBACK, ALLOWING FOR VISIBILITY SIMILAR TO THE REQUIRED 15 BY 15 VISIBILITY TRIANGLE STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF CHAPTER 42 AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND WE HAVE RECEIVED NO ADVANCED WRITTEN COMMENT.
ALRIGHT LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM UH, 82 SALINAS ESTATE, THAT SHARON STREET.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS IF THERE ARE ANY.
SO, UM, HEARING NONE WE'LL MOVE FORWARD.
AGAIN, WE'VE GOT A RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS LISTED.
UM, IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION BALDWIN, BALDWIN AND JONES.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
THANK YOU AND THANK YOU MR. CASTILLO FOR BEING HERE FOR QUESTIONS.
ITEM 83 IS WILDCAT INDUSTRIAL.
UH, THIS APPLICATION WAS DEFERRED AT THE PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.
UH, THE SITE'S LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS SOUTH ALONG HOLMES ROAD BETWEEN HARM CLARK AND BUFFALO SPEEDWAY.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG HOLMES ROAD AND ALONG THE PLATTE BOUNDARY.
BY NOT PROVIDING A NORTH, SOUTH, OR EAST WEST STREET THROUGH THE PROPERTY, STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST.
THE APPLICANT IS DEVELOPING A VACANT 2022 ACRE TRACK INTO AN INDUSTRIAL SITE.
THE SITE IS BOUNDED BY CENTER POINT INJURY, EXCUSE ME, CENTER POINT ENERGY CORRIDOR TO THE SOUTH AND A HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROLLED DITCH TO THE WEST AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES TO THE NORTH.
THESE EXISTING CONDITIONS MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO MAKE A VALUABLE STREET CONNECTION IN EITHER DIRECTION.
THE TRANSMISSION CORRIDOR DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY LOCAL STREETS TO CROSS PER CHAPTER 42 AND CROSSING THE DRAINAGE DITCH REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM APPROVAL AND COORDINATION FROM HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL.
IN ADDITION, THE MAJORITY OF THE UNDEVELOPED TRACKS TO THE EAST ARE UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP WITH FRONTAGE ALONG THE ADJACENT MAJOR FAIR FAIRS.
THE COUN, THE COUNCIL MEMBER'S OFFICE
[00:40:01]
REQUESTED A DEFERRAL LAST CYCLE.UH, STAFF WAS ABLE TO COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC WORKS AND MEMBERS OF THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO HELP ADDRESS THEIR CONCERNS.
UH, MR. CHAIR, I BELIEVE WE DO HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE, UM, SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM AFTER THIS.
AND, UH, THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
UH, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUEST OF VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT.
AGAIN, WE'RE ON ITEM 83, WILDCAT INDUSTRIAL.
WE HAVE MS. CHAFE, CHIEF OF STAFF FOR MAYOR PRO TEM CASTEX TATUM HERE.
MS. CHAIS, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING HERE.
UH, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY.
UM, PURITA CHAVIS, CHIEF OF STAFF FOR MAYOR PRO TEM MARTHA CASTEX TATUM, COUNCIL MEMBER OF DISTRICT K.
UM, AND IN REFERENCE TO THE PLAT APPLICATION, WILDCAT INDUSTRIAL, UM, CONSTITUENTS JUST RECENTLY, AND I MEAN PROBABLY 10 MINUTES AGO, REACHED OUT TO THE COUNCIL MEMBER STILL EXPRESSING CONCERN ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO A SUNSET PROPERTY.
UH, I DO WANT TO THANK HOUSTON PUBLIC WORKS, MR. JOHN BROWN AND ALSO THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT IN LOOKING INTO THE CONCERNS THAT THE CONSTITUENTS HAD REGARDING, UM, THE ADJACENT PROPERTY, 300 HOLMES ROAD BEING A SUNSET PROPERTY, THEY STILL HAVE CONCERNS AND WANT, UM, MORE DETAILS ON THE HISTORY OF THAT PROPERTY AND WE REQUEST, UM, THE MAYOR, MAYOR PRO DOES REQUEST A DEFERRAL TO ALLOW US TO GET DETAILS TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS OF THE CONSTITUENTS.
WE DO UNDERSTAND THAT IT'S NOT THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S, UM, UM, PURVIEW TO, UH, WITH REGARDS TO UM, ANY ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND, BUT STILL THE MAYOR PROM WOULD LIKE, UH, DE UH, MORE TIME SO THAT WE CAN GET DETAILS ON THE HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY TO ADDRESS HER CONSTITUENTS CONCERNS.
IT'S QUESTIONS FOR OUR SPEAKER, MS. CHAFET COMMISSIONERS.
UH, IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS, WE'RE GONNA MOVE ON WITH ITEM 83.
WE'VE GOT A RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE, BUT OUR, UM, OUR CITY COUNCIL MEMBER, UH, PRO TIM HAS ASKED FOR A DEFERRAL.
SO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON EITHER OF THOSE? SO IF THERE IS A MOTION, MOTION TO DEFER, I NEED TO KNOW WHAT IT'S FOR.
[e. Subdivision Plats with Special Exception Requests (Tammi Williamson) ]
TO SECTION E SUB SUBDIVISION PLA WITH SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST.YES, I'D LIKE TO, UH, RECUSE MYSELF FROM UH, ITEMS 84 AND 85 IF YOU WOULD MAKE A NOTE.
GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
ITEM 84 IS DUNHAM POINT GP AND ITEM ITEM 85 DUNHAM POINT RESERVE.
SECTION FIVE WHICH IS RELATED, HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON'S EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN NORTHWESTERN HARRIS COUNTY LOCATED SOUTH OF US TWO 90 AND EAST OF THE GRAND PARKWAY, BISECTED BY MASON ROAD, MKI ROAD, MOUND ROAD AND JACK ROAD.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A 1300 ACRE GENERAL PLAN AND REQUESTING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING BY NOT PROVIDING AN EAST WEST PUBLIC STREET.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST IN 2024, AN AMENDMENT TO THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND FREEWAY PLAN WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL TO REMOVE A SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED MAJOR THOROUGHFARE MOOSHKI ROAD FROM MOUND ROAD TO BRIDGELAND LAKE PARKWAY WHERE MUSHIE WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO CROSS CYPRESS CREEK WITH THIS ROADWAY NO LONGER REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED.
NO EAST WEST LOCAL STREETS ARE REQUIRED TO CROSS THE EXISTING DETENTION LABELED AS JK THREE.
ON THE EXHIBIT VARIANCES WERE ALSO GRANTED IN 2016 NOT TO REQUIRE ANY SUBST STREETS ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY EXCEPT SOUTHERN BOUNDARY.
ACCEPT THE PROPOSED MAJOR THOROUGHFARES DUE TO CYRUS CREEK.
THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION BEING REQUESTED IS TO ALLOW SECTION 30 AND THE AREA LABELED AS FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN SECTION 30 AND THE DETENTION AREA, NOT TO CONNECT TO EACH OTHER'S INTERNAL STREET AT WORK.
THIS PROPOSED INTERSECTION SPACING BETWEEN MEENAL DRIVE AND THE SOUTHWESTERN GP BOUNDARY REPRESENTS A 16.7% DEVIATION FROM THE STANDARD, WHICH IS NOT DISPROPORTIONATE.
THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AREA INTENDED FOR LOTS HAS MORE THAN 500 FEET OF FRONTAGE ALONG MEENAL DRIVE ALLOWING FOR ITS FUTURE CONNECTIVITY WHILE SECTION 30 CONNECTS WITH THE FUTURE SECTION TO ITS NORTH
[00:45:01]
AND SECTION 28 FOR TWO POINTS OF ACCESS TO THE SAME LOOP STREET, HARRIS COUNTY ENGINEERING HAS VOICED NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST.THEREFORE, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION AND APPROVE THE GENERAL PLAN SUBJECT TO CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS IN ADVANCE AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION.
UM, AGAIN, WE'RE ON ITEM 84 AS ITEM 85 HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? SEEING NONE, WE'LL MOVE FORWARD.
AGAIN, WE'RE VOTING ON ITEM 84, DURHAM POINT GP WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS THAT APPROVE THE PLAT QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION? AMANDA PARKER.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
[f. Reconsiderations of Requirement (Tammi Williamson and Devin Crittle) ]
ON TO ITEM 86 S AND WE'RE IN THE RECONSIDERATION OF REQUIREMENTS.THE SITE IS LOCATED WHEN IN HOUSTON'S EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN HARRIS COUNTY ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF FUQUAY STREET, BETWEEN SCOTT STREET, SCOTT STREET AND CULLEN BOULEVARD.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A TYPE TWO PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT SUBDIVISION OF 74 LOTS AND 12 RESERVES FOR DETENTION, COMPENSATING OPEN SPACE AND PARKING AND REQUESTING A RECONSIDERATION OF REQUIREMENT WITH A VARIANCE TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING.
BY NOT EXTENDING THE SUB STREET, THISTLE STREET NOR TO TERMINATE IN A CUL-DE-SAC.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST.
THE SITE IS CURRENTLY VACANT AND WITHIN THE MINX PLACE SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN 1908 THISTLE STREET.
THE PUBLIC SUB STREET ON THE SUBJECT'S WESTERN BOUNDARY WAS RECORDED IN 1955 IN HOLLOWAY HEART, HOLLOWAY HEIGHTS, SECTION TWO WITH A NORTHWARD CURVE.
THE ALIGNMENT OF THISTLE STREET AND THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO THE EAST MAKE EXTENDING THE STREET THROUGH THE SITE IMPRACTICAL AND DIFFICULT FOR A MEANINGFUL CONNECTION.
LIKEWISE, THE PROPERTY OWNER NORTH OF THE UNIMPROVED STUB STREET HAS STRUCTURES WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
THE LOSS OF THE POTENTIAL EAST WEST STREET FOR THIS BLOCK WILL NOT SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT TRAFFIC CIRCULATION FOR THE AREA.
THE INTERSECTION SPACING BETWEEN FUQUA STREET AND SHEME ROAD BOTH CLASSIFIED AS MAJOR COLLECTORS IS APPROXIMATELY 1,520 FEET, WHICH IS A LITTLE OVER AN 8% DEVIATION FROM THE STANDARD AND COULD HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION WITH THE STEP STREET BEING ONLY ONE LOT IN DEPTH AND NOT IMPROVED REQUIRING A CUL-DE-SAC IS NOT BENEFICIAL FOR MANEUVERABILITY.
HARRIS COUNTY ENGINEERING HAS VOICED NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST.
THEREFORE, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS IN ADVANCE AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM 86 SORA WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK EITHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD? HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION FOR A STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION MANKA SECOND BALLARD.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
87 ITEM 87 IS ONE WORD FALLS GP UH, THIS ITEM WAS DEFERRED AT THE PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.
UH, THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE ETJ OF HARRIS COUNTY ALONG KATY HOCKLEY ROAD JUST NORTH OF LOGAN BALL ROAD.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A MINIMUM INTERSECTION SPACING OF 301 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 600 FEET.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST.
THIS GENERAL PLAN IS INTENDED FOR A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY WITH ACCESS FROM KATY HOCKLEY ROAD AND LOGAN BALL ROAD ALONG KATIE HOCKLEY.
THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES INTERSECTIONS TO BE SPACED A MINIMUM OF 600 FEET APART.
THE ONE WORD COVE SUBDIVISION NORTHEAST OF THIS SITE WAS RECENTLY RECORDED AND ESTABLISHED AN INTERSECTION ALONG KATY HOCKLEY.
THE APPLICANT DOESN'T HAVE THE OPTION TO CENTER LINE TIE WITH THAT INTERSECTION TO THE NORTH BECAUSE THE PROPERTY'S UNDER SEPARATE OWNERSHIP.
ALSO, THE PROPOSED STREET CONNECTION CANNOT SHIFT FURTHER SOUTH BECAUSE IT COULD INTERFERE WITH BUSES MAKING A LEFT HAND TURN INTO THE KATY ISD SCHOOL SITE.
ULTIMATELY, HARRIS COUNTY HAS REVIEWED THIS REQUEST AND HAS VOICED NO OBJECTION.
STAFFS RECOMMEND GRANTING THE REQUEST OF VARIANCE AND APPROVING THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM 87 WINWARD FALLS GP, UM, WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS LISTED.
UM, I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION MOTION
[00:50:01]
AK SECOND.ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
[Items g - j]
NOW MOVE ON TO GHI AND J.GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, STAFF WOULD LIKE TO TAKE SECTIONS G-H-I-N-J AS ONE GROUP.
PLEASE DO SECTION G EXTENSION OF APPROVAL CONSISTS OF ITEMS 88 THROUGH 100 SECTION H NAMED NAME CHANGES CONSISTS OF NO ITEMS. SECTION I CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CONSISTS OF ITEMS 101 AND 102 AND SECTION J ADMINISTRATIVE CONTAINS NO ITEMS. THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUESTS THE APPROVAL.
ALL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SECTIONS GHI AND J.
IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS, MADRE I HAVE AAL ON 89 A RECUSAL ON 89 FOR MARRE.
ANYONE ELSE? ALRIGHT, HEARING, UH, ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THESE ITEMS G THROUGH J? HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION POROUS PERLE.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED? HEARING NONE.
[k. Development Plats with Variance Requests (Ed Buckley and Ramon Jaime-Leon) ]
K DEVELOPMENT PLATS WITH VARIANCE REQUESTS.ITEM 1 0 3, UH, HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN.
GOOD AFTERNOON, UH, CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
ITEM 1 0 4, THAT'S 42 10 FULTON STREET.
THE SITE IS LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE LIGHT RAIL AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FULTON STREET AND CODY STREET.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING NOT TO DEDICATE FIVE FEET FOR WIDENING FOR CODY STREET.
THE CURRENT RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH IS 50 FEET ALONG CODY STREET.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER PER APPLICANT'S REQUEST.
UH, MR. HEIM, LEON, QUESTIONS, COMMENTS? I HAD A QUESTION.
BALDWIN, ON THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS ON THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE, DO THEY HAVE ANY PARKING REQUIREMENTS WITH THE RAIL ADJACENT TO IT? UH, THE PERMIT IS INTENDED TO MEET, UM, TOD REQUIREMENTS.
SO THEY ARE GOING, THEY'RE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE PARKING, UH, REDUCTION BY COMPLYING WITH TOD.
COULD THEY HAVE JUST THE HANDICAP SPOT? I'M JUST ASKING COULD, ARE THEY REQUIRED TO HAVE ANY? YES.
ANYONE ELSE? ALRIGHT, SO AGAIN, WE'RE ON ITEM 1 0 4, WHICH IS 42 10 FULTON STREET WITH A RECOMMENDATION BY STAFF TO DEFER.
IF THERE ARE NO QUESTION OR COMMENTS, IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION BALDWIN BALDWIN SECOND MAD.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
THIS ITEM IS DEFERRED ITEM 1 0 5, ITEM 1 0 5 7 26 LAWRENCE STREET.
THE SITE IS LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF LAWRENCE STREET, SOUTH WEST EIGHTH STREET AND NORTH OF HEIGHTS, HIKE, BIKE AND TRAIL.
THE APPLICANT IS CONSTRUCTING A 4,816 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE THAT REQUESTS TO ALLOW A FIVE FOOT BUILDING LINE FOR THE SECOND FLOOR IN LIEU OF THE ORDINANCE.
REQUIRED 10 FOOT BUILDING LINE ALONG LAWRENCE STREET.
RECOMMENDATION IS TO SUPPORT THE VARIANCE REQUEST.
UH, THE FIRST FLOOR FOLLOWS A 10 FOOT BUILDING LINE FOR THE MAIN STRUCTURE AND 20 FOOT GARAGE BUILDING LINE SETBACK.
THE SECOND FLOOR CANTILEVER INTO THE BUILDING LINE BY FIVE FEET.
THIS LOT IS LOCATED AT THE END OF THE STREET ADJACENT TO AN EXISTING PARK.
THE FIVE FOOT BUILDING SETBACK IS IN LINE WITH THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES AND THE FOOTPRINT OF THE PREVIOUS HOUSE STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
UH, SO THE SECOND FLOOR CANTILEVER DOWN, HOW HIGH UP IS THAT? IS THIS PURE AND BEAM? IS THIS, DO WE KNOW HOW HIGH UP THAT IS FROM UH, IT'S, I BELIEVE IT'S NINE FEET.
TO, IT MEETS THE BUILDING CODE.
SO ON THIS REPL, IS THIS GOING INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY? IS THIS GOING INTO THE BACK PARK OR WHERE IS THIS GOING INTO? IT'S THERE.
THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT PLOT WHERE, AND, AND, AND THE ENCROACHMENT IS ALONG LAWRENCE STREET WITH THE SECOND FLOOR CANTILEVERING INTO, INTO INTO THE BUILDING LINE.
INTO THE BUILDING INTO THEIR PROPERTY.
ANYONE ELSE? YEAH, I JUST, UM, ON THE PICTURES IS THE ELECTRIC ON LAWRENCE? YEAH, LAWRENCE IS, IS, IT'S ON THE SIDE OF THE, THE BUILDING.
SO ARE THEY GONNA ENCROACH IN THE 10 FOOT UTILITY CLEARANCE FOR THE AERIAL? I'LL MAKE A NOTE OF THAT.
I'LL HAVE TO LOOK INTO THAT, I BELIEVE.
WELL, I GUESS TO PUT IT FOR THE RECORD, THAT IF THEY DO CREATE A CODE CLEARANCE VIOLATION, THEY'RE GONNA BE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR HANDLING THAT WITH THAT POINT.
I'LL HAVE TO LOOK AT, I DON'T KNOW IF THAT IS A FEEDING LINE OR IT'S A HIGH VOLTAGE LINE.
[00:55:01]
GOT A PROBLEM.I DON'T, I DON'T KNOW IF THEY DO OR DO NOT, BUT THANK YOU.
SO, UH, LET ME ASK THE QUESTION.
DO WE, SO THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION STAYS, WE JUST TALKED TO THE APPLICANT ABOUT, UH, ABOUT RESTRICTIONS MM-HMM
WE DON'T NEED TO DEFER THIS FOR ANOTHER TWO WEEKS OR DO WE NO, YOU DON'T.
IT'S, IT'S AN ADMINISTRATIVE QUESTION.
DO YOU NEED TIME TO DO THIS OR IS IT DONE WITH NOTE PERMIT TO PICK IT UP? IT, IT'S, IT'S, UH, PERMITTING.
THANK YOU FOR CLEARING THAT UP FOR ME.
IT'S JUST A COMMENT THAT THEY WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE TO HANDLE IT.
ANYONE ELSE? ALRIGHT, WE ARE ON ITEM 1 0 5 7 26 LAWRENCE STREET WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.
IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION FROM BALDWIN BALDWIN SECOND MAD.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO YES, MR. CHAIR.
MS. THERE WERE SPEAKERS FOR ITEM 1 0 4 FULTON STREET.
OH, I'M SORRY I DIDN'T HAVE YOU SIGNED UP SIR.
DID HE GIVE UP HIS RIGHT? NO, NO.
UH, WE HAD QUESTIONS ON THE DEFERRAL, WHAT THAT MEANS FOR 42 10 FULTON STREET.
THIS IS MY FIRST COMMISSION MEETING.
I'M COURSE I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THIS.
IT ONLY MEANS THAT, UH, THAT MORE INFORMATION IS GONNA BE GATHERED OVER THE NEXT TWO WEEKS AND IT WILL BE COMING UP IN THE MEETING IN TWO WEEKS.
SO THE NEXT MEETING, TWO WEEKS FROM NOW, DECIDING WILL BE COMING UP AGAIN.
THEY HAVE TWO WEEKS TO GET IN LINE WITH, UH, STAFF TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYTHING IS, YOU KNOW, THE T'S ARE CROSSED AND THE I'S ARE DOTTED.
BUT IT DOES GIVE YOU TWO WEEKS IN THE INTERIM TO TALK TO, UH, THE OWNER, THE DEVELOPER AND STAFF TO GET MORE INFORMATION.
IS THERE ANYTHING ON OUR PART THAT'S NEEDED APPLICANT WISE? UM, THAT WOULD BE UP TO STEPH.
'CAUSE THEY WERE TRYING TO MAKE A, ATE 10 FEET, WHICH WOULD ELIMINATE THE ABILITY TO DO THE BUILDING AND THERE'S A MINIMUM TD REQUIREMENT FOR PARKING THAT, THAT IS NOT FOR US TO DECIDE HERE TODAY.
'CAUSE WE'VE ALREADY MADE A DEFERRAL.
BUT YOU WOULD NEED TO GET WITH STAFF BECAUSE WHAT WE NEED IS A RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF AND LEGAL TO SAY THIS IS GOOD, LET'S MOVE FORWARD.
UH, IF THERE'S SOMEBODY I CAN SPEAK TO YOU AFTERWARDS, THAT'S FINE.
WELL, UH, MR. BUTLER OR MR. LEON CAN GIVE YOU SOME DIRECTION AND JUST TO CORRECT THIS.
A DEDICATION OF FIVE FEET ONLY? YES.
QUESTIONS BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD? ALRIGHT.
[II. Establish a public hearing date of July 9, 2026 ]
TO ROMAN TWO AND WHICH IS TO ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF JULY 9TH, 2026.FOR THE, UM, ITEMS ON THE SCREEN, WHICH ARE ALCONBURY RESIDENCE BAYOU WOODS, SECTION TWO, PARTIAL RELA NUMBER THREE AND EXTENSION BRAISE PARK ESTATE, HAMLET RESIDENCE, HIGHLINE ENCLAVE, RELA NUMBER ONE, KIRK ANDAL VILLAGE, SECTION ONE, RELA NUMBER ONE R RETREAT, TORRES VENTURE, RELA NUMBER ONE AND VAIL VIEW HOMES.
IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? MOTION? BALLARD.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED? HEARING NONE.
UH, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ROMAN THREE.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? ALRIGHT, HEARING NONE, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ADJOURNMENT AT 3 31.
THANK YOU LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.