[00:00:01]
ARK AND I'M THE CHAIR OF THE HOUSTON PLANNING COMMISSION, AND I'M CALLING THIS MEETING TO ORDER.IT IS 2:32 PM ON THURSDAY, JUNE 26TH, 2025.
THIS IS AN IN-PERSON MEETING TAKING PLACE AT THE CITY HALL ANNEX AT 900 BAGBY.
YOU MAY ALSO MONITOR THE MEETING BY VIEWING VIA HTV SPEAKERS.
IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON AN ITEM, PLEASE FILL OUT THE SPEAKER'S FORM BEFORE THE ITEM IS CALLED AND TURN IT INTO STAFF NEAR THE FRONT DOOR.
CONSENT AND REPEAT SPEAKERS ARE ALLOWED.
NEW SPEAKERS ARE TIME FOR TWO MINUTES.
COUNCIL MEMBERS SPEAKING ON AN ITEM ARE NOT TIMED AND APPLICANTS THEY'RE ALLOTTED TWO MINUTES TIME AS WELL AS REBUTTALS NON APPLICANTS, UH, WHICH ARE GENERAL SPEAKERS, ARE ALLOWED TWO MINUTES TIME, BUT THERE IS NOT AN OPTION FOR REBUTTAL.
EVEN IF YOU DID NOT USE YOUR FULL TWO MINUTES, YOU WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK AGAIN AND YOU CANNOT ALLOT YOUR TIME TO ANOTHER SPEAKER TO ESTABLISH A QUORUM.
I'M GONNA CALL THE ROLE CHAIR CLARK IS HERE.
COMMISSIONER HINES IS NOT HERE.
COMMISSIONER ROBBINS? NOT HERE.
COMMISSIONER ROSENBERG? NOT HERE.
COMMISSIONER TEHIR IS NOT HERE.
UH, COMMISSIONER CCAA PRESENT AND SECRETARY TRAN PRESENT.
OKAY, NOW I'M GONNA ASK FOR THE, LET'S SEE, I HAVE NO WITHDRAWALS TODAY, SO WE DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THAT.
[Director’s Report]
NOW I'LL CALL FOR THE DIRECTOR'S REPORT.GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIR CLARK, COMMISSION MEMBERS AND THE PUBLIC.
I'M VON TRAN, SECRETARY OF THIS COMMISSION AND DIRECTOR OF THE HOUSTON PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
UH, FIRST OF ALL, THE MTFP UPCOMING DATES.
UH, THE NEXT ONE WILL BE JULY 24TH, UH, A PUBLIC HEARING.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION, UH, IS A, IS IT'LL BE RIGHT BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND IT IS IN PERSON ONLY.
UH, THE FOLLOWING MEETING IS AUGUST 21ST AND IT IS AN APPLICATION UPDATE AND IT IS ALSO AN IN-PERSON ONLY MEETING.
AND THEN THE FINAL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 18TH.
UH, IT IS A RECOMMENDATION MEETING WHERE THE COMMISSION, UH, WILL, UH, TAKE ACTION.
UH, SO WITH THAT SAID, THAT IS ALL I HAVE.
UH, BUT BEFORE I LEAVE, I JUST WANTED TO, UH, ACKNOWLEDGE WE HAVE SEVEN INTERNS JOINING THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
THEY WILL BE WITH US, HELPING US LEARNING FROM US.
UH, THEY'LL BE HERE UNTIL THE END OF JULY.
I WOULD LOVE FOR THEM TO STAND UP.
THEY'RE HERE IN THE AUDIENCE WITH US, AND, UH, SO PLEASE STAND UP SO WE CAN.
YEAH, THESE ARE THE FUTURE OF OUR CITY.
UH, EVERY YEAR WE HAVE, UH, AN AMAZING, UH, GROUP OF YOUNG PEOPLE WHEN THEY COME, THEY ALWAYS HAVE SUCH AMAZING FRESH, BRIGHT IDEAS FOR US.
SO WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO, UH, SEEING WHAT COMES ABOUT AT THE END OF THEIR TERM.
UH, SO IN CLOSING, THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CAN BE REACHED AT (832) 393-6600 OR YOU CAN CALL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNER OF THE DAY AT 8 3 2 3 9 3 6 6 2 4.
YOU MAY ALSO VISIT OUR WEBSITE@HOUSTONPLANNING.COM.
[Consideration of June 12, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes]
SO NOW WE'LL MOVE TO CONSIDERATION OF THE JUNE 12TH, 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.COMMISSIONERS, THEY WERE ON THE AGENDA AND IN YOUR PACKET, DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION KLIK.
COMMISSIONER MAREZ, UH, MADE THE MOTION AND KLIK MADE THE SECOND.
ALL IN FAVOR? A OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES.
[Platting Activities a & b]
NOW WE'LL MOVE ALONG TO, UH, ROMAN NUMERAL ONE PLATTING ACTIVITY AND PLEASE NOTE THAT COMMISSIONER TAHIR IS JOINING US.UH, GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
SECTION A AND B ARE PRESENT AS ONE GROUP, WHICH INCLUDES CONSENT.
REPLY ITEMS NOW REQUIRING NOTIFICATION, SECTION A AND B ARE ITEMS ONE THROUGH 97 SECTION A.
CONSENT ITEMS ARE NUMBERS ONE THROUGH 62 AND SECTION B, REPLAY ITEMS NUMBER 63 THROUGH 97.
NO ITEMS NEED TO BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER AND THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
MADAM CHAIR, IF THERE ARE NO INDIVIDUALS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THESE ITEMS, THE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUESTS THE APPROVAL OF ALL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSENT AND REPLAY ITEMS NOT
[00:05:01]
REQUIRING NOTIFICATION.I KNOW COMMISSIONER, MORALE, YOU HAVE A FEW THINGS YOU WANT RECUSE ON? YES.
UM, SECTION A 7, 8, 9, AND 56 AND SECTION B 67.
SO I NEED A MOTION FOR ALL ITEMS, SAVE AND ACCEPT.
DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION JONES SECOND VICTOR.
NOW WE NEED TO CONSIDER ITEM 7 8, 9 56 AND 67.
DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION POURS SECOND SIGLER.
[c. Replats requiring Public Hearings with Notification (Dorianne Powe-Phlegm, John Cedillo, Devin Crittle, Ken Calhoun and Aracely Rodriguez)]
SECTION C PUBLIC HEARINGS.GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
MY NAME IS RA RODRIGO, ITEM 98 11 LIVING.
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT SOUTH OF WEED ROAD AND EAST OF STATE HIGHWAY 2 88.
THE PURPOSE OF THE WE PLOT IS TO GRADE FIVE SINGLE FAMILY LOT AND ONE GUEST PARKING SPACE.
NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM.
AND THE APPLICANT MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
PER LEGAL REVIEW, THE PROPOSED WELA WOULD NOT VIOLATE APPLICABLE RESTRICTION AND THAT RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLUS SUBJECT TO THE CCP C 1 0 1 FORM CONDITION THAT WE SEE ONE PUBLIC COMMENT IN A VAN WHO IS IN OPPOSITION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
BUT SO MADAM CHAIR, IT'S A PLEASE THE COMMISSION.
YOU MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 98 IS CONTINUED.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO OKAY.
HEARING NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I KNOW THAT COMMISSIONER ARD HAS A QUESTION.
THE PUBLIC COMMENT THAT I READ SAY STATED THAT THE NOTIFICATION SIGN WAS TAKEN DOWN THREE DAYS LATER IS THAT WERE ABLE TO AFFIRM, CONFIRM OR DIDN'T.
I THINK SHE SPOKE ABOUT LAST CYCLE, BUT THE APPLICANT WAS ABLE TO SUBMIT PICTURE EVEN WITH THE UPDATED MEETING CURRENTLY TODAY.
UM, I THINK THEY MET THE NOTIFICATION.
COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION GARZA.
OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES ITEM 99 99 HAMLET LOT.
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT NOR OF KEWELL ROAD, EAST OF WAYSIDE DRIVE AND SOUTH OF PARKER ROAD.
THE PURPOSE OF THE WE PLOT IS TO GRADE THREE SINGLE FAMILY LOT.
NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT PER LEGAL REVIEW.
THE PROPOSED WE PLOT WILL NOT VIOLATE APPLICABLE RESTRICTION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLUS SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM.
MADAM CHAIR IS TO PLEASE TO THE COMMISSION.
YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 99 IS OPEN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS, IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'M GONNA CLOSE THE PUBLIC, UH, HEARING.
SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES ITEM 100, ITEM 100 LAND WOOD PART
THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT AT THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF, I MEAN SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF BINGO ROAD AND HEP HEMPSTEAD ROAD.
THE PURPOSE OF THE WE PLA IS TO CREATE ONE COMMERCIAL RESERVE.
NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS PER LEGAL REVIEW.
THE PROPOSED WE PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE APPLICABLE RESTRICTION.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLANS SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITION.
UM, STAFF DID RECEIVE MULTIPLE PUBLIC COMMENTS IN ADVANCE WHO ARE IN OPPOSITION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, VOICING CONCERN ON POLLUTION, INCREASED TRAFFIC, DECREASED QUALITY OF LIFE, DECREASE OF PROPERTY VALUE, AND POTENTIAL CRIMES.
SO, MADAM CHAIR, IF YOU APPRECIATE THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PROPERTY HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 100 IS OPEN.
I DO HAVE SPEAKERS SIGNED TO SPEAK.
OUR FIRST SPEAKER IS DON BUTTE.
AND CORRECT ME IF I MISPRONOUNCED.
UH, GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSION.
I COME BEHALF, COULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD
[00:10:01]
PLEASE? SORRY DANIELLE, BUT THANK YOU.UM, I COME ON BEHALF OF THOSE WHO ARE UNABLE TO PARTICIPATE DUE TO FAMILY OBLIGATIONS WORK OR TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES.
THEY'VE ASKED ME TO VOICE THEIR CONCERNS REGARDING THE REPL THAT WOULD ALLOW THE DEVELOPER TO CONSTRUCT A NEW GAS STATION ON THIS LOT.
THE MAIN CONCERNS ARE FOR NOISE, POLLUTION, INCREASED TRAFFIC, LIGHT, UH, PROBLEM OF CRIME ALREADY PRESENT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND THE INTERSECTION IS SOMEWHAT KNOWN TO HAVE MINI TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS.
AND SO WE'RE ASKING YOU TO OPPOSE THIS REPLAY.
OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS NORMA FLORES.
WHEN I STARTED NORMA FLO LIMESTONE ON LANGUAGE.
WHAT NUMBER IS THIS MORNING? 6 1 0 6 6 8 1 LIMESTONE STREET.
WARD FAMILY RESIDE, UH, I'M SO SORRY.
SO SHE BOUGHT THE PROPERTY, UM, WHICH IS NOW FOR LIVING PURPOSES FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES ONLY.
SO WITH THIS BUSINESS, UM, SHE THINK THAT EVERYTHING IS GONNA BECOME COMMERCIAL.
AND SHE HAD CONCERN THAT I CANNOT DEVALUE HER PROPERTY AND HAVE SOME DAMAGE.
AND BESIDES TION AND SHE DOESN'T WANNA DEAL WITH PROBLEM, UM, WITH FLOODING BECAUSE SHE SAID THAT IT FLOOD A LOT.
EVEN SHE REPORTED TO THE CITY OF HOUSTON AND THERE'S NO RESOLUTION.
MY NEIGHBOR,
I WAS UNABLE TO BRING MY DOG OUT.
I WAS UNABLE TO WALK IN MY YARD BECAUSE I WAS AFRAID TO PICK UP SOME KIND OF VIRUSES OR SOMETHING.
THEY CALL THE CI CALLED THE CITY, BUT THEY CAME UNTIL WHENEVER.
OKAY, OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS FASSINO GARCIA.
UM, HIS NAME IS FTO FINO GARCIA FINO.
UM, HE HAD A, A UNIT, A ZIP BEHIND.
HE HAVE A UNIT AND HE HAVE CONCERN THAT HE HAVE A FOOT UNIT.
AND BY BUILDING THE GAS STATION, HE THINK THAT IT'S GONNA AFFECT HIS BUSINESS.
SO HE THINK HE WOULD BE AFFECTED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND, UH, UH, YOUR COMPANY.
SO IN THE GAS STATION ACROSS THE STREET.
[00:15:01]
LAST SPEAKER IS JUNAID.GOOD AFTERNOON PENDING COMMISSION.
MY NAME IS JEAN VE AND I'M SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE NEIGHBORS AND THE BUSINESSES IN THE AREA.
UH, AS DANNY HAD MENTIONED BEFORE, WE HAVE CONCERNS THAT THE AREA IS JUST GONNA GET MORE TRAFFIC AND POLLUTION AND THEN ADDITIONALLY THERE'S GONNA BE, UH, MORE, UH, THERE'S ALREADY A CRIME IN THE AREA AND MY FATHER OWNS A GAS STATION ACROSS THE STREET AND THERE'S A LOT OF CRIME IN THE AREA ALREADY.
AND SO WE JUST THINK IT'S GONNA BRING ADDITIONAL LIGHT IN THE AREA AND THEN ALSO A SNOWBALL EFFECT.
'CAUSE IF YOU'RE REPLANTING, UH, RESIDENTIAL AREAS INTO COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, THEN THAT'S JUST GONNA BE OTHER PEOPLE TO COME IN THE AREA.
AND THEN THE, UH, OTHER PEOPLE THAT LIVING IN THE AREA ARE NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO LIVE THERE ANYMORE.
SO WE HIGHLY RECOMMEND THAT WE DON'T GO WITH THIS.
THAT'S THE LAST SPEAKER I HAD SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK? OKAY.
QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER GARZA.
UM, THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR INTERPRETING.
THAT WAS REALLY HELPFUL FOR EVERYONE, I'M SURE.
UM, SO OUR SPEAKERS BROUGHT UP A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.
THE FIRST IS, OUR LAST SPEAKER MENTIONED THAT IT WAS RESIDENTIAL CHANGING TO COMMERCIAL.
IT HAS BEEN COMMERCIAL, CORRECT? YEAH.
WE ARE, THEY'RE ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT NOISE, LIGHTING, TRAFFIC, FLOODING AND CRIME.
SO WE'RE GONNA ADDRESS THEM ONE AT A TIME.
SO, UM, THERE'S NOT, THERE'S LITTLE WE CAN DO ABOUT NOISE, BUT THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WE CAN DO ABOUT LIGHTING AND THAT IS WE CAN, UH, REQUEST IS THERE EVERANCE REQUEST IN THIS OR NOT? NO.
SO STANDARDS THOUGH REQUIRE THIS, UH, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO BUILD SINCE IT BACKS UP TO A NEIGHBORHOOD, I BELIEVE AN EIGHT FOOT FENCE.
AND CAN WE REQUEST THAT LIGHTING IS SHIELDED FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD? CAN WE, I MEAN, IT'S, IT'S NOT A VARIANCE.
I REALIZE IT'S NOT A VARIANCE, BUT WE COULD REQUEST IT.
IT'S A VARIANCE, CORRECT? UM, GO AHEAD.
IT'S NOT A VARIANCE, RIGHT? NO.
THIS IS VI THE BANDI PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
UM, THE PROJECT WILL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF WHENEVER THE PROPERTY IS NEXT TO RESIDENTIAL.
THEY HAVE TO, UM, SHIELD THE LIGHTING, WHICH IS THE NEW REQUIREMENTS DUE TO BUFFERING ORDINANCE.
AND ALSO THERE WILL BE A REQUIREMENT FOR A FENCE OR SOME KIND OF LANDSCAPE BUFFER, WHICH IS PART OF CHAPTER 33.
SO THEY'LL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THOSE REQUIREMENTS.
AND THE FENCING IS REQUIRED AND IT'LL BE EIGHT FEET TALL.
FENCING OR, OR LANDSCAPE OR LANDSCAPE FENCING OR LANDSCAPE.
I THINK THESE NEIGHBORS WOULD PROBABLY PREFER FENCING, BUT AGAIN, THIS IS NOT, THEIR CHOICE DIDN'T HAVE A CHOICE.
PER CHAPTER 33, THERE IS OPTIONS.
SO THE APPLICANT CAN CHOOSE WHICH ONE THEY WOULD LIKE TO DO.
UM, OKAY, SO TRAFFIC, THIS DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY KIND OF TRAFFIC STUDY, CORRECT? YES, SIR.
AND THEN AS FOR FLOODING AND CRIME, UM, THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT WE CAN HANDLE HERE, ALTHOUGH, UM, I THINK WHEN WE GET TO PERMITTING, WE CAN START, THAT'S GONNA HAVE TO BE UNDER REVIEW.
AND WE'VE GOT, UH, SOME PUBLIC WORK FOLKS, WORKS FOLKS IN THE BACK.
AND MAYBE, UM, MR. BROWN, COULD YOU GUYS GET TOGETHER WITH THEM AND, AND TALK THEM THROUGH THE YEAH.
THE DRAINAGE AND DETENTION AND, AND ALL OF THAT, PLEASE.
SO THOSE ITEMS ARE GONNA BE ADDRESSED.
UNFORTUNATELY, WE, UH, THERE'S NOT A THING THAT THIS, THIS, UM, COMMISSION CAN DO ABOUT CRIME OR COMPETITION FOR THE OTHER GAS STATION ACROSS THE STREET.
BUT I THINK THAT, UH, AND FOR THE MOST PART, WE CAN GET MOST OF YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED TO PROTECT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE THAT YOUR PROPERTY IS NOT GONNA BE DAMAGED AND IT'S NOT GONNA LOSE VALUE.
SO AGAIN, I JUST WANNA REITERATE, THIS IS NOT RESIDENTIAL CHANGING TO COMMERCIAL, IT IS COMMERCIAL AND THEY'RE SIMPLY BUILDING ON IT.
SO AGAIN, THIS IS A SHALL APPROVE FOR THIS COMMISSION AND IT A REQUIREMENT IS THAT WE APPROVE IT ACCORDING TO ORDINANCES, STATE AND STATE LAW.
ANYONE ELSE?
DO WE KNOW, AND I CAN'T TELL ON OUR, OUR DOCUMENTS, ARE THE, UH, CURB CUTS GONNA REMAIN WHERE THEY'RE CURRENTLY LOCATED? OR WILL THEY BE ADJUSTED AWAY FROM THE INTERSECTION? NO.
I, I DON'T HAVE A STIPEND, SO I DON'T KNOW.
WE DON'T KNOW YET WHAT THE PROPOSED PLAN ARE.
MAY MAYBE IT COULD BE A CON UH, DISCUSSION.
I HAVE NO OTHER SPEAKERS, SO I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
RODRIGUEZ, WOULD YOU MAKE SURE YOU GIVE YOUR CARD TO OUR SPANISH SPEAKERS? YEAH.
SO THAT, UH, YOU CAN EXPLAIN TO THEM SO THEY HAVE FULL UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT'S GOING ON.
I TALKED WITH HIM, THEM BEFORE
[00:20:01]
THE MEETING.BUT I'M MORE THAN WELCOME TO WRITE THEM.
UM, ITEM 1 0 1 IS LOCKWOOD COMMERCIAL PLAZA.
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LIMIT WEST ALONG LOCKWOOD DRIVE AND NORTH OF I 10.
THE PURPOSE OF THE PL IS TO CREATE ONE COMMERCIAL RESERVE.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED.
WITH THIS ITEM, THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
A PER LEGAL REVIEW, THE PROPOSED PL WILL NOT VIOLATE APPLICABLE RESTRICTION.
SO THAT RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLA, SUBSTITUTE THE CPC 1 0 1 INFORMED CONDITION.
MADAM CHAIR, IF TO APPRECIATE THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 1 0 1 IS OPEN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK? HEARING NONE? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES ITEM 1 0 2.
GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS A 5,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CITY LIMITS NORTH ALONG MAINOR STREET, EAST OF STATE HIGHWAY 2 88 AND NORTH OF SOUTH LOOP SIX 10.
THE PURPOSE OF THE REPL IS TO CREATE TWO LOTS ON A SHARED DRIVEWAY.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THE PLAT DOES NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY AND STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS APPLICATION.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CCP C 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
MADAM CHAIR, IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION.
YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 1 0 2.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO OKAY.
HEARING NONE? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
ALL IN FAVOR? A OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES ITEM 1 0 3.
ITEM 1 0 3 IS MANSFIELD OAKS REPL NUMBER ONE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS A 1.8 ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CITY LIMITS NORTH ALONG MANSFIELD STREET, EAST OF SEBER STREET AND SOUTH OF DESOTO STREET.
THE PURPOSE OF THE RE PLAT IS TO CREATE 29 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND TWO RESERVES ON A TYPE TWO PAE PRIVATE STREET SUBDIVISION.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUEST OF THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
THIS IS A FULL PLAT OF MANSFIELD OAKS AND LEGAL REVIEW INDICATES THAT THE APPLICATION DOES NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY.
UH, STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS APPLICATION.
SO STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS MANDATORY.
PLEASE THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I HAVE A QUESTION.
UM, WHERE IS THE, UH, PARKING ON THIS PROJECT? IF YOU GO BACK TO THE SITE IT IS IN RESERVE, I THINK D WHICH IS EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE PAE YOU'LL SEE THE ACTUAL DETENTION RESERVE AND THEN THERE'S A SMALL RECTANGLE THAT IS 40 BY 20.
OKAY, I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON ITEM 1 0 3.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
UM, WHAT IF LOT 11 DOWN ON THE BOTTOM? 'CAUSE THEN THERE'S ANOTHER LOT 11 WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION.
SO, SO THE LOT COUNT GOES TOWARDS THE ACTUAL BLOCK PHASE.
THERE MAY, IF THERE'S ANOTHER LOT 11, IT'S PROBABLY ON BLOCK TWO OR BLOCK THREE.
THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION.
SO DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION GARZA.
ITEM 1 0 4, ITEM 1 0 4 IS MAYFLOWER RESIDENCE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS AN 11,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CITY LIMITS NORTH ALONG MAYFLOWER STREET, EAST OF CALHOUN STREET AND SOUTH OF PURGING STREET.
THE PURPOSE OF THE RELA IS TO CREATE FOUR LOTS AND TWO LANDSCAPE RESERVES ON A SHARED DRIVEWAY.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ON NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
STAFF HAS RECEIVED MULTIPLE COMMENTS AND CONCERNS FROM THE COMMUNITY AS WELL AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL PERSON REGARDING D RESTRICTIONS, AND I HAVE PREPARED A PRESENTATION TO GIVE MORE BACKGROUND INFORMATION REGARDING THOSE CONCERNS.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS A RE PLAT OF LOTS THREE AND FOUR OF SUNNYSIDE ESTATES PLATTED IN 2015.
UH, SUNNYSIDE ESTATES ITSELF IS A REPL OF LOT 29 OF SOUTHLAND ACRES A SUBDIVISION RECORDED BY DEED AFTER WORLD WAR II.
UH, IN 1955, EAST SUNNYSIDE COURT REP PLOTTED A PORTION OF SOUTHLAND ACRES TO AND IMPOSE DE RESTRICTIONS ON THAT NEW SUBDIVISION.
UH, THE SUBJECT SIDE ITSELF IS AN OUTLINED PROPERTY FROM EAST SUNNYSIDE COURT SECTION THREE AND NOT A PART OF THE BOUNDARY OF THAT SUBDIVISION.
UH, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS DEFERRED THE PLAT AS THE STAFF PREPARED.
[00:25:01]
UH, PACKET FOR THE APPLICATION INCLUDED INCORRECT INFORMATION.IT INCLUDED A GRAPHIC OF THE SITE PLAN FOR THE APPLICATION FOR MAYFLOWER MAY MAYFLOWER MANNER, WHICH IS TO BE ON NEXT COMMISSION.
THAT CONFUSION HAS LED TO A BIT OF CONCERNS AS FAR AS, UH, WHAT APPLICATION IS BEING CONSIDERED.
SO WE ARE REQUESTING DEFERRAL IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THAT.
UH, THE APPLICA HAS STILL MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SO ONE, UH, DEFERRAL SHOULD BE SUFFICIENT TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS.
MADAM CHAIR, PLEASE COMMISSION.
UH, WE YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ASSIGNMENT AT THIS TIME.
I'M GONNA OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I HAVE SPEAKERS.
OUR FIRST SPEAKER IS STEVEN JAMES WITH DISTRICT D COUNCIL MEMBER DR.
THANK YOU MADAM CHAIR AND COMMISSION.
I'M STEVEN JAMES, CHIEF OF STAFF FOR DISTRICT DI BRING YOU GREETINGS FROM THE OFFICE OF DR. CAROLYN EVANS SHABAZZ, COUNCIL MEMBER FOR DISTRICT D.
IT IS A PLEASURE TO BE HERE ON BEHALF OF THE EAST SUNNYSIDE COURT CIVIC ASSOCIATION.
AS YOU MAY KNOW, COUNCIL MEMBER EVAN SHABAZZ IS A STAUNCH SUPPORTER OF DEED RESTRICTIONS AS THE CITY OF HOUSTON HAS NO ZONING, DEED RESTRICTIONS ARE THE ONLY WAY THAT OUR COMMUNITIES ARE ABLE TO MAINTAIN THEIR CHARACTER AND THEIR INDEPENDENCE, IF YOU WILL.
NOW THE EAST SUNNYSIDE, UH, CIVIC ASSOCIATION, WE ARE PLE I'M PLEASED TO SAY TODAY IS HERE REPRESENTED BY THIS GROUP OF PEOPLE.
WILL Y'ALL STAND UP? MADAM CHAIR? MAY I HAVE THE PLEASURE TO INTRODUCE BRIEF INTRODUCTIONS FROM THE PRESIDENT? ROLY RICHARDSON? HI, MY NAME IS ROSALYN RICHARDSON.
I'M HERE TO ON BEHALF OF EAST SUNNYSIDE COURT.
MY CONCERN IS ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
WE'RE A FAMILY OWNED, UH, PROPERTY AND ALSO WE WHO HAVE A LOT OF SENIORS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT'S ACTUALLY, IT'S A HISTORIC AREA AND WE'RE TRYING TO KEEP EVERYTHING INTACT.
SO I JUST LIKE TO SAY, UH, I APPRECIATE Y'ALL LISTENING.
I KNOW WE HAVE TO COME BACK FOR THE NEXT HEARING, BUT I'M JUST KIND OF NERVOUS.
WE'RE NOT, WE'RE NOT HERE TO JUDGE YOU.
WE'RE JUST HERE TO LISTEN TO YOU.
SO I JUST WANT TO, SO I AM HERE AND WE ARE TRYING TO SAVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
REALLY APPRECIATE YOU COMING IN AND SHARING THAT INFORMATION.
AND I GUESS WE'LL SEE YOU IN TWO WEEKS.
ALRIGHT, MADAM CHAIR, AS I CLOSE, WE DO WANT TO ANNOUNCE OUR SUPPORT OF THE EAST SUNNYSIDE COURT CIVIC CLUB IN THEIR OPPOSITION TO THE MAYFLOWER RESIDENCE PROJECT.
WE LOOK FORWARD TO SPEAKING WITH YOU ON JULY THE 10TH.
AND PLEASE GIVE THE COUNCIL MEMBER OUR GREETINGS AS WELL.
WE REALLY APPRECIATE YOU COMING IN.
AND UH, IF I MAY, PERSONAL PRIVILEGE, WE UNDERSTAND THE DIFFICULT CHALLENGES YOU ALL FACE EVERY TIME YOU SIT DOWN IN THOSE CHAIRS.
AS WE SAT HERE TODAY AND LISTENED TO HOW MANY GROUPS DO NOT COME UP AND SPEAK UP FOR THEIR COMMUNITIES, THAT'S WHY IT'S SO IMPORTANT THAT THIS GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS IS DOING THEIR CIVIC PART.
SO THANK YOU ON BEHALF OF THE COUNCIL LADY.
SO I DO HAVE SOME OTHER SPEAKERS.
I'LL CALL YOUR NAME IF YOU WANNA WAIT TILL NEXT.
WE'RE GONNA WAIT, WE GOTTA WAIT.
WELL I,
COMMISSIONER GARZA, MR. CILLO, DO WE KNOW IF THEY'VE GOT, UM, SET BACK A MINIMUM BLOT SIZE IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD? SO IN THE SUBDIVISION ITSELF OF EAST SUNNY SIDE COURT, THERE ARE DEED RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE TO BEING UPHELD.
HOWEVER, THIS SUBJECT SIDE IS NOT WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF EAST SUNNY SIDE COURT.
BUT HAVING SAID THAT, DOES THIS PROPERTY BY ITSELF HAVE MINIMUM BLOCK SIZE OR SETBACKS? NO.
BUT IT COULD BE POTENTIALLY YES.
A UH, MINIMUM LOSS SIZE APPLICATION.
IT COULD BE A MINIMUM LOSS SIZE COURT APPLICATION WOULD BE INCLUSIVE OF BLOCK FACE, WHICH THIS WOULD BE INCLUSIVE OF THE BLOCK FACE FOR MAYFLOWER.
WELL THEN HOPEFULLY, UM, IF YOU CAN TALK TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND LET THEM KNOW WHAT THEIR OPTIONS ARE.
IF, IF DEIDRE ARE NOT YOUR ANSWER, THERE MIGHT BE OTHER TOOLS THAT YOU CAN USE.
OKAY, COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, I'LL CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF DEFERRAL.
ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES.
PLEASE NOTE THAT COMMISSIONER MAREZ IS RECUSING FROM THIS ITEM.
[00:30:01]
ITEM 1 0 5 MCLENDON PARK, VILLAGE, PARK TWO VLA NUMBER ONE.THE SITE IS LOCATED IN HOUSTON, ETJ IN HARRIS COUNTY WEST ALONG DAY HOWARD LAKE AND NORTH OF WEST PARK TOLLWAY.
THE PURPOSE OF THE VLA IS TO CREATE ONE RESERVE FOR LEAVE STATION.
A VARIANT TO SECTION 180 3 IS BEING REQUESTED TO CHANGE THE USE OF A SMALL PORTION OF A DETENTION RESERVE ON MY HARRIS COUNTY MUD NUMBER ONE 20 INTO A LIFT STATION.
STAFF SUPPORT THIS VARIANT REQUEST.
THE PROPOSED LEAVE STATION IS VITAL TO PROVIDING PROPER SUGAR SERVICE TO THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY.
HARRIS COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE VARIANT REQUEST PER LEGAL REVIEW, THE PROPOSED WE PLOT WILL NOT VIOLATE APPLICABLE RESTRICTION AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL.
THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT IS THAT DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS IN ADVANCE.
THAT RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLANS SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 INFORMED CONDITION.
MADAM CHAIR IS TO PLEASE THE COMMISSION.
YOU MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 1 0 5 IS CONTINUED.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? COMMISSIONERS, UNLESS YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
ALL IN FAVOR? A OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES.
ITEM 1 0 6 IS MEDINA MAGNOLIA PLACE.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS A 9.7 ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE FORT BEND COUNTY, EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION NORTH ALONG EVERGREEN STREET, WEST OF SOUTH POST OAK BOULEVARD, NORTH OF TRAMMELL FRESNO ROAD.
THE PURPOSE OF THE REPL IS TO CREATE ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT AND ONE UNRESTRICTED RESERVE.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN ON NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS REVIEW.
BILINGUAL INDICATES THE PROPOSED UNRESTRICTED RESERVE DOES VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS, UH, SEPARATELY FILE D RESTRICTIONS AND, UH, STAFF HAS HAVE, HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION, SAY FOR THE LAST CYCLE WHERE THERE WAS CONCERNS OF THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED WELDING SHOP.
UH, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO FURTHER PLA FOR TWO WEEKS PER APPLICANT REQUEST TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO COORDINATE WITH CITY LEGAL AND FIND A MEANS TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE.
MADAM CHAIR, PLEASE THE COMMISSION.
YOU MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 1 0 6 IS CONTINUED.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO OKAY.
HEARING NONE? I'M GOING TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING COMMISSIONERS.
ANY QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I'LL SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
GOOD AFTERNOON MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
MY NAME IS KEN CALHOUN, ITEM ONE OH SE ITEM 1 0 7 IN SHADY V VILLA HOMES.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS OVER 7,400 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY LOCATED IN HOUSTON, CITY LIMITS EAST OF ANTOINE DRIVE AND NORTH OF WESTVIEW DRIVE.
THE PURPOSES OF REPL SCRAPE TWO SINGLE FAMILY LOTS.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THE APPLICATION DOES NOT VIOLATE SEPARATELY FILE D RESTRICTIONS OR THOSE ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION STATUTE RECOMMENDATION TO PROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CBC FORM CONDITIONS.
THE COMMISSION MAY OPEN THE BOOK HEARING AT THIS TIME.
I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 1 0 7.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, I'LL SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION MOTION VICTOR.
ITEM 1 0 8, ITEM 1 0 8 IS REN WOOD PARTIAL REPL NUMBER SIX.
THE SUBJECT SITE IS OVER 14,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS NORTH OF KATY FREEWAY AND WEST OF BRIMORE ROAD.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO CREATE TWO SINGLE FAMILY LOTS.
NO VARIANCES ARE BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THE APPLICATION DOES NOT VIOLATE SEPARATELY FILE DEED RESTRICTIONS OR THOSE ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT.
STAFF HAS RECEIVED ADVANCED COMMENTS REGARDING TRAFFIC CONCERNS WHICH, UH, HAS BEEN RELAYED TO PUBLIC WORKS.
UH, PRIOR TO THIS MEETING, UH, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO PROVE THE PLA SUBJECT, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS.
UH, MADAM CHAIR PLEASE COMMISSION.
YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 1 0 8 IS OPEN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO HEARING NONE? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEEK A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
[d. Subdivision Plats with Variance Requests (Geoff Butler)]
MOVE ON TO D SUBDIVISION PLOT WITH VARIANCE REQUESTS.[00:35:04]
GOOD AFTERNOON MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE HOUSTON PLANNING COMMISSION.UH, IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, WE'D LIKE TO TAKE ITEMS 1 0 9 THROUGH ONE 11 TOGETHER.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY ETJ ALONG US 59 NORTH OF FM 1314.
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A 212 ACRE GENERAL PLAN IN TWO RESIDENTIAL SECTIONS.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE GP AND A VARIANCE TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG THE SOUTH BY NOT EXTENDING MAY ROAD THROUGH THE SITE.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THESE REQUESTS.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN MONTGOMERY COUNTY ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE OF AZALEA BOULEVARD.
THIS MAJOR COLLECTOR COMBINED WITH NEARBY THOROUGHFARES FORMS THE STREET GRID CIRCULATING TRAFFIC IN AND AROUND THE SITE.
THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN WILL FEATURE THREE PUBLIC STREET CONNECTIONS TO THE PERIMETER ROADS FROM THE RESIDENTIAL SECTIONS.
STAFF FINDS THAT THE PROPOSED CONNECTIONS TO THE THE EXISTING STREETS CAN PROVIDE ADEQUATE CIRCULATION WITHOUT PROVIDING AN ADDITIONAL EAST WEST STREET.
THE GP IS TO THE NORTH OF SEVERAL ACREAGE TRACKS AND THE TERMINUS OF MAYOR ROAD.
THIS ROAD OFFERS ACCESS TO THIS COMMUNITY THOUGH IT FEATURES SUBSTANDARD PAVING AND RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH.
THE PAVED SECTION OF MAYOR ENDS APPROXIMATELY 180 FEET SOUTH OF THE GP.
SO EXTENDING IT WOULD REQUIRE ADDITIONAL COSTS.
STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST TO NOT EXTEND IT.
PRACTICAL CONSIDERS THE STREET'S LIMITATIONS AND OTHER ACCESS POINTS WITHIN THE GP.
UH, STAFF RECOMMENDS GRAINING THE REQUESTS APPROVING THE GP AND SECTIONS PER THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS AND WE'VE RECEIVED NO ADVANCE WRITTEN COMMENT.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THESE EITHER.
IS THERE ANYONE OUT THERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? OKAY.
COMMISSIONERS, IF YOU HAVE NO QUESTIONS, WE ARE GONNA TAKE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON 1 0 9 1 10 AND ONE 11.
ALL IN FAVOR? A OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES AND PLEASE NOTE COMMISSIONER TEHIR IS BACK WITH US AND WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM ONE 12.
ITEM ONE 12 IS ENCLAVE AT KATIE HOCKLEY.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE ETJ WITHIN HARRIS COUNTY ALONG KATY HOCKLEY ROAD NORTH OF STOCKDALE SCHOOL.
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THREE RESERVES AND IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING REQUIREMENTS BY NOT EXTENDING WHITEHAVEN GATE STREET THROUGH THE SITE.
STAFF RECOMMENDS DEFERRAL TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE CLARIFYING MATERIALS FOR REVIEW.
WE'VE RECEIVED NO ADVANCED WRITTEN COMMENT ON THIS ITEM.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THIS ONE EITHER.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ONE 12? OKAY.
COMMISSIONERS, IF THERE'S NO QUESTIONS, DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR DEFERRAL? MOTION MAD SECOND JONES.
ITEM ONE 13 IS GRIFFIN AIRPORT AND 2 88 INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY SECTION TWO.
THE SITE IS LOCATED ALONG ALAMEDA ROAD SOUTH OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND NORTH OF MAORI ROAD.
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A RESERVE FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO USE INTERNAL ACCESS TO CONNECT TO AIRPORT BOULEVARD RATHER THAN TAKING ACCESS FROM THE ABUTTING LOCAL STREETS BY EXTENDING TO STUB STREETS.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE GRIFFIN AIRPORT AND 2 88 INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY GENERAL PLAN.
THE GREATER PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF INDUSTRIAL USES UTILIZING LARGE TRUCK TRAFFIC.
THE SITE IS TO THE SOUTH OF SECTION ONE, WHICH IS RECENTLY APPROVED WITH SIMILAR REQUESTS TO TAKE USE ACCESS EASEMENTS TO AIRPORT BOULEVARD.
THIS WAS APPROVED WITH THE JUSTIFICATION.
THE ACCESS TO A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE WOULD BE A PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE TO USING THE NEIGHBORHOOD SINGLE FAMILY STREET SYSTEM.
THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU REPRESENTS A 22 ACRE ADDITION TO THE APPROVED SECTION WITH SIMILAR JUSTIFICATION, THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO PHYSICALLY SEPARATE THEIR SITE FROM THE ABUTTING LOCAL STREETS WITH LANDSCAPING AND DETENTION.
THE TRUCK ACCESS WILL COME THROUGH SECTION ONE TO AIRPORT BOULEVARD.
STAFF FINDS THIS TO BE A MORE PRACTICAL SOLUTION THAN STRICT INTERPRETATION OF CHAPTER 42 AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND WE'VE RECEIVED NO ADVANCE WRITTEN COMMENT.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO? OKAY.
DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION MOTION COLLE.
ITEM ONE 14 IS TESORO RANCHOS.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE HARRIS COUNTY ETJ NORTHWEST OF US HIGHWAY TWO 90 AND THE GRAND PARKWAY.
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A ONE ACRE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR THE LOT TO UTILIZE A 30 FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT RATHER THAN DIRECT FRONTAGE ON A PUBLIC STREET OR PAE STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST.
THE SITE IS LOCATED OFF OF BALKINS WEST OF BECKER.
THE SITE IS WITHIN A COMMUNITY OF MOSTLY LARGE LOT RESIDENCES ON ACREAGE
[00:40:01]
TRACKS.THE SUBJECT SITE IS AT THE END OF AN APPROXIMATELY 950 FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT CONNECTING THE RESIDENCES TO BALKINS ROAD.
THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO PLA THEIR PROPERTY WITH A VARIANCE TO USE THIS EASEMENT AS A SOLE POINT OF ACCESS.
VARIANCES HAVE BEEN GRANTED TO THE NEIGHBORING TRACKS TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING SO THERE WILL NOT BE ANY NEW PUBLIC STREET CONNECTIONS TO THE SITE FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.
IN ADDITION, ONE OF THE, THE ONE NEW HOME WILL NOT GENERATE TRAFFIC REQUIRED FOR A NEW STREET THAT WOULD REQUIRE A NEW STREET AND IT SHOULD BE SAFE TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXISTING ACCESS.
STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST TO BE JUSTIFIED AND RECOMMENDS GRAIN THE VARIANCE IN APPROVING THE PLAT FOR THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
AND WE RECEIVE NO ANSWER IN COMMENT.
I DON'T HAVE ANYONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON ONE 14.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO? OKAY.
COMMISSIONERS, IF YOU HAVE NO QUESTIONS.
YOU KNOW WHAT I'M GONNA ASK THE 14 FOOT UH, UE.
WE DID BRING THAT TO THE APPLICANT'S ATTENTION.
UH, AND AND THEY'RE GONNA ADDRESS THAT.
DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION MAN.
[f. Reconsiderations of Requirement (Geoff Butler)]
WE'LL MOVE ON TO F RECONSIDERATION OF REQUIREMENT.ITEM ONE 15 IS RESERVE AT MOONSHINE HILL LOOP.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON'S CORPORATE LIMIT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUMBLE AND THE ETJ LINE.
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A RESERVE FOR A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING RECONSIDERATION OF THE REQUIREMENT TO ADDRESS INTERSECTION SPACING BY NOT PROVIDING NORTH SOUTH STREET STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST.
THE SITE IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF MOONSHINE HILL AND MOONSHINE HILL LOOP ROADS SOUTH OF THE SAN JACINTO RIVER.
THE PROXIMITY TO THIS WATERSHED LIMITS OPPORTUNITIES FOR ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH.
THE CITY'S MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND FREEWAY PLAN CALL FOR FUTURE COLLECTOR STREET AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARES IF THIS AREA IS REDEVELOPED.
IN ADDITION, THE SITE IS CLO IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO A NORTH SOUTH STREET TO THE WEST.
A SEGMENT OF THIS STREET IS WITHIN AN ACCESS EASEMENT SO IT DOESN'T TECHNICALLY QUALIFY TOWARDS THE INTERSECTION SPACING REQUIREMENT.
HOWEVER, THE STREET IS PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE AND MAINTAINED BY THE CITY.
SO IT MEETS THE INTENT OF THE REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW FOR TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND ACCESS.
STAFF FINDS ITS REQUEST TO MEET THE INTENT OF CHAPTER 42 AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND WE RECEIVE NO ADVANCE WRITTEN COMMENT.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO YES, PLEASE COME FORWARD.
I LIVE RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER FROM WHERE THIS DEVELOPMENT AND IT'S A REALLY RURAL AREA AND WE DON'T HAVE A WHOLE LOT OF TRAFFIC IN THERE.
AND IF YOU DID PUT AN INTERSECTION IN THERE, THERE'S ONLY, UH, THREE WAYS IN AND OUT OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT ALL LEADS TO 1960.
SO THERE'S NO OTHER WAY IN OR OUT.
YOU WOULD JUST IMPEDING MORE TRAFFIC IN ON US AND THERE'S REALLY NO NEED FOR THE ROAD AT ALL.
AND MY OTHER NEIGHBORS THAT ARE AROUND US, THERE'S NOT THAT MANY HOMES IN THE AREA BECAUSE EVERYTHING DOWN TOWARD THE RIVER DOES FLOOD.
SO IT'S JUST WHAT'S ON TOP OUT OF THE FLOODPLAIN AREA.
SO AS A REQUEST FROM MYSELF AND MY NEIGHBORS, WE REALLY OPPOSE THAT ROAD COMING IN.
ANY QUESTIONS COMMISSIONERS? OKAY.
OKAY, SO WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF.
DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION BALDWIN SECOND COVAR.
ITEM G EXTENSION OF APPROVAL CHAIR.
PLEASE NOTE THAT COMMISSIONER MAREZ IS ABSTAINING FROM ITEM ONE 16 AND ONE 20.
[Platting Activities g - i]
UH, IF IT PLEASE THE COMMISSION STAFF WOULD LIKE TO TAKE SECTIONS.GH AND I AS ONE GROUP? YES PLEASE.
SECTION G EXTENSIONS OF APPROVAL CONSISTS OF ITEMS ONE 16 THROUGH 1 27 SECTION H.
NAME CHANGES CONSISTS OF ITEM 1 28 AND SECTION I.
CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE HAS NO ITEMS. THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUESTS APPROVAL OF ALL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SECTIONS, GH AND I.
COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE A MOTION FOR, UH, APPROVAL OF GH AND I DO I HAVE A MOTION.
MOTION POUROUS PER SECOND TO HEAR.
WE HAVE NOTHING UNDER J OR K SO WE, OKAY.
[II. Establish a public hearing date of July 24, 2025]
SO WE'RE MOVING ALONG TO ROMAN NUMERAL TWO.ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF JULY 24TH, 2025 FOR THE FOLLOWING.
[00:45:01]
HIGHLAND CROSSING.PLACE ESTATES JOHNSON PLACE VIEWS MCGREGOR RESIDENCE MCKENZIE PARK, SECTION FOUR RE PARTIAL REPL NUMBER TWO, MOUNT HOUSTON ROAD.
MUD CORDOBA DRIVE PARK, REPLANT OF SOUTHGATE EDITION SECTION THREE.
PARTIAL REPL NUMBER ONE ROLLING FOR FORK POD WATER PLANT TRAILS ON ELMWOOD AND VILLAS AT SCOTT.
DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION GARZA.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE, UH, TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT? OKAY, HEARING NONE.
IT IS 3:19 PM AND I'M ADJOURNING THIS MEETING.