* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:05] [Call to Order] THE 2 31 ON THURSDAY, MARCH 7TH, 2024. THIS MEETING OF THE HOUSTON PLANNING COMMISSION IS CALLED TO ORDER. I AM THE CHAIR, MARTY STEIN. AND IN ORDER TO VERIFY THAT WE HAVE A QUORUM, I'LL CALL THE ROLE THE CHAIR IS PRESENT. VICE CHAIR GARZA. PRESENT? PRESENT. COMMISSIONER ALLMAN. PRESENT. PRESENT. BALDWIN PRESENT. COMMISSIONER CLARK. PRESENT VAR. PRESENT. COMMISSIONER. HES WILL BE ABSENT. COMMISSIONER HINES IS NOT PRESENT. COMMISSIONER JONES? PRESENT, PRESENT. COMMISSIONER KLIK. PRESENT. COMMISSIONER. MODEST PRESENT. COMMISSIONER POROUS PERLE. PRESENT VIRTUALLY IS PRESENT VIRTUALLY. COMMISSIONER ROBBINS HERE IS HERE. COMMISSIONER ROSENBERG IS NOT PRESENT. COMMISSIONER SIGLER WILL BE ABSENT. COMMISSIONER TAHI IS NOT PRESENT. COMMISSIONER VICTOR WILL BE ABSENT. COMMISSIONER VERA BLAND IS NOT. HE OR SHE WILL BE LATE. UM, COMMISSIONER KANE IS NOT PRESENT. COMMISSIONER DALTON IS NOT PRESENT. AND COMMISSIONER MON MANKA IS PRESENT. . OKAY. UM, AND, UH, UH, DIRECTOR JENNIFER OSLAND. SORRY, IT'S NOT ROLLING OFF MY TONGUE YET. PRESENT IS PRESENT. SO 13 MEMBERS HAVE RESPONDED TO ROLL CALL. WE HAVE A QUORUM. UM, EVERYBODY ELSE JOINING US TODAY, WE WELCOME YOU. UM, STAFF'S FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE DEPARTMENT, UH, WEBSITE. UM, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE THEM ALL, UH, PUBLIC COMMENT THAT WAS RECEIVED BEFORE NOON YESTERDAY IS IN THE COMMISSION'S PACKET, UM, AND ONLINE. AND, UM, JUST ANOTHER REMINDER, IF YOU ARE WITH US TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM, UM, AND YOU ARE HERE IN THE ROOM, MAKE SURE YOU FILL OUT ONE OF THESE LITTLE RECTANGULAR FORMS. IF YOU'RE WITH US ONLINE, PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU KEEP YOUR DEVICE, UM, UH, THE, THE SOUND MUTED UNTIL YOU'RE CALLED ON TO TALK. AND IF YOU'RE ON A COMPUTER, ALSO KEEP YOUR CAMERA OFF UNTIL IT'S YOUR TURN TO TALK. UM, WITH THAT WE WILL GO TO [Director’s Report] THE DIRECTOR'S REPORT. DIRECTOR OLY. THANK YOU CHAIR. UH, GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS JENNIFER OSLAND. I AM, UH, SECRETARY OF THIS COMMISSION AND AN INTERIM DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. UH, THE AKERS HOME STUDY IS, HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE HOUSTON MAP VIEWER. THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT CAME UP RECENTLY SO PEOPLE CAN, YOU KNOW, IF THEY'RE LOOKING THERE FOR OTHER THINGS LIKE MINIMUM LOT SIZE OR MAJOR THOROUGHFARE, THEY CAN FIND A LAYER, UM, THAT POINTS 'EM AT THAT STUDY. UH, THE STUDY AREA AUTOMATICALLY SHOWS UP WHEN YOU ZOOM INTO THE AREA AND THERE'S A HYPERLINK TO THE FINAL REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION, SO THAT SHOULD BE HELPFUL. UM, WE'RE CONDUCTING A VIRTUAL WORKSHOP ON THE CHAPTER 42 LIVABLE PLACES, ORDINANCE, AMENDMENTS, IT'S OPEN TO ANYBODY. UM, WE ENCOURAGE ANYBODY INTERESTED, UM, TO TUNE IN. IT'S SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, MARCH 27TH FROM TWO TO 4:00 PM INFORMATION REGARDING THE MEETING AND LINK WILL BE AVAILABLE ON PLANNING DEPARTMENT WEBSITE SOON. AND WE'LL SEND AN EMAIL, UM, WE'LL LET THE COMMISSIONERS KNOW, SO WE'LL SEND YOU THAT LINK. UM, AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, UH, THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND FREEWAY PLAN, UM, AMENDMENT PROCESS IS UNDERWAY. THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DEADLINE, UH, PASSED ON MARCH 1ST. WE RECEIVED NINE APPLICATIONS, SO, UM, YOU, WE WILL BE, UM, UPDATING YOU ON OTHER MILESTONES IN THE PROCESS SOON. UH, BUT JUST TO NOTE, THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD IS MAY 13TH TO JULY 5TH, 2024. SO WE WILL START, UM, REVIEWING THOSE AND START, UH, COORDINATING WITH THE OTHER AGENCIES [00:05:01] ON THOSE. UM, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT, UM, WHAT WAS IN THIS REPORT OR ANYTHING ELSE, UH, THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CAN BE REACHED AT (832) 393-6600, OR YOU CAN CALL THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNER OF THE DAY AT 8 3 2 3 9 3 6 6 2 4. AS ALWAYS, VISIT OUR WEBSITE@HOUSTONPLANNING.COM FOR DETAILS. UM, AND THAT CONCLUDES MY DIRECTOR'S REPORT. THANK YOU. ANY, UH, COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? UM, KUDOS ON GETTING THAT AKERS HOME MOBILITY STUDY UP THERE SO FAST. THAT WAS GREAT. REALLY APPRECIATE THAT. UM, [Consideration of the February 22, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes] IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, WE WILL MOVE ON TO, UH, APPROVAL OF THE FEBRUARY 22ND, UH, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES. IF THERE ARE NO ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? MOTION COLLE KLIK. SECOND CLARK, CLARK. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THEY'RE APPROVED. THAT'LL TAKE US. OH. AND NOTE THAT, UH, WE'VE BEEN JOINED BY COMMISSIONER HINES. THANK YOU. UM, SO [Platting Activities a & b] WE GO TO ROMAN NUMERAL ONE PLATTING ACTIVITY. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS JAMES TIHI. SECTIONS A AND B ARE PRESENTED AS ONE GROUP, WHICH INCLUDES CONSENT AND REPLAY ITEMS NOT REQUIRING NOTIFICATION. SECTIONS A AND B ARE ITEMS ONE THROUGH 93 SECTION A. CONSENT ITEMS ARE NUMBERS ONE THROUGH 50 AND SECTION B REPL ITEMS ARE NUMBERS 51 THROUGH 93. UH, STAFF WOULD LIKE TO TAKE OUT OF ORDER. ITEM 78, PALEO TOWN HOMES A SHORT PRESENTATION AND WE'LL FOLLOW AFTER THIS. THERE ARE NO OTHER ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER AND THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS MADAM CHAIR, IF THERE ARE NO INDIVIDUALS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THESE ITEMS, THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUEST THE APPROVAL OF ALL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSENT AND REPLAY ITEMS NOT REQUIRING NOTIFICATION, SAVE AND ACCEPT FOR ITEM 78. OKAY, THANK YOU. UM, COMMISSIONERS, ARE THERE ANY OTHER ITEMS THAT WE NEED TO TAKE SEPARATELY? UH, I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANY. UM, YES, AND WE DO HAVE A SPEAKER ON 78 AND, UM, MS. BANDY WILL MAKE A PRESENTATION ON THAT IN A MINUTE. SO, UH, LET'S GO FORWARD WITH ITEM 78. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS VIDA BANDY. ITEM 78 IS PALACIO TOWN HOMES. IT'S A CLASS TWO RE PLAT AND THE PLAT IS PROPOSING THREE, UH, SINGLE FAMILY LOTS FROM A SHARED TAKING ACCESS FROM A 16 FEET SHARED DRIVEWAY. THEY'RE ALSO DEDICATING A 10 FEET RIGHT OF WAY. UH, FOR THE STREET PURPOSES, THE PLAT IS BEING RECOMMENDED FOR DEFERRAL BECAUSE, UM, ALL OF THE DEFERRAL OPPORTUNITIES HAVE EXHAUSTED. BUT THE APPLICANT WANTS TO COORDINATE AND WORK WITH CENTER POINT, UM, WHICH IS REQUIRING THEM TO HAVE A 10 FEET BUILDING LINE FURTHER THAN WHAT IS ALLOWED BY CHAPTER 42. APPLICANT IS HERE TO REQUEST AN EXTINCTION PER STATE LAW. OKAY. AND, UM, PENDING THEIR, THEIR, UH, UH, TESTIMONY ARE, ARE YOU CHANGING YOUR RECOMMENDATION TO DEFER? I HAVE DISAPPROVE ON MY AGENDA. WE WERE RECOMMENDING DISAPPROVAL MADAM CHAIR, UNLESS THE COMMISSION, UM, ALLOWS THE DEFERRAL, WE CANNOT MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF DEFER. THAT'S WHY IT'S DIFFICULT. OKAY, GREAT. ALL RIGHT, WELL THEN LET'S HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT. MONICA FONTANO. GOOD AFTERNOON. I'M MONICA FONTANO POINDEXTER. I AM THE APPLICANT FROM CHESTERFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. THE CLIENT IS CURRENTLY, THE OWNER IS CURRENTLY WORKING WITH CENTERPOINT, WHO THEY'VE LOOKED AT IT, THEY'VE SEEN PICTURES, THEY'VE SENT A CREW OUT TO STUDY IT, AND IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY BELIEVE THERE'S A WAY THAT THEY COULD POTENTIALLY GET A FIVE FOOT BUILDING LINE INSTEAD OF A 10 FOOT, BUT IT REQUIRES A PROCESS. AND DUE TO THAT PROCESS, WE'RE REQUESTING AN EXTENSION AT THIS TIME, A 30 DAY EXTENSION. A 30 DAY EXTENSION. OKAY. AND DO WE HAVE THAT IN WRITING? YES. OKAY. ALRIGHT. UH, ANY QUESTIONS FOR MS. VINO? POINDEXTER? OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU SO MUCH. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ELSE WHO IS, WANTS TO SPEAK ON ITEM 78 PALACIO TOWNHOUSES? UM, IF NOT, UM, WE DO HAVE, UH, A LETTER ASKING FOR A 30 DAY, 30 DAY DEFERRAL. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? YES. COMMISSIONER MAREZ. UH, MY MY QUESTION TO STAFF IS IF THAT HASN'T BEEN RESOLVED AFTER 30 DAYS, DOES IT COME BACK AS A DISAPPROVAL? YES, MA'AM. OKAY. UH, YEAH, I THINK IT'S GONNA BE A TIGHT SCHEDULE. THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING IF IN THE APPLICANT, I'M SURE AWARE OF THAT, YES, THERE IS AN OPTION TO DO LOT SIZE AVERAGING, WHICH THE APPLICANT IS CHOOSING NOT TO GO FORWARD UNLESS THEY HEAR BACK FROM CENTER POINT. SO IF CENTER POINT SAYS, NO, YOU, WE [00:10:01] STILL NEED 10 FOOT BUILDING LINE, THEN THEY HAVE THE OPTION TO STILL DO LOT SIZE AVERAGING AND COMPLY WITH THE ORDINANCE. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. SO THERE IS A, THERE'S A WAY TO GET THERE. YES. OKAY. YES. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? UM, IS THERE THEN A MOTION FOR DEFERRAL? I TO UH, MAKE IT A DEFERRAL. OKAY. SO, AND IT'S A 30 DAY DEFERRAL. SO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR A 30 DAY DEFERRAL. SECOND. SECOND MODEST. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES. IT IS DEFERRED FOR 30 DAYS. THANK YOU MS. VANDY. OKAY, SO WE RETURN TO THE REMAINDER OF ALL ITEMS IN SECTIONS A AND B AND WE WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON EVERYTHING. SAVE AND ACCEPT ITEM 78, WHICH WE'VE ALREADY CONSIDERED. UH, IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION GARZA, GARZA, HALI. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES. AND WITH THAT WE WILL GO [c. Replats requiring Public Hearings with Notification (Dorianne Powe-Phlegm, John Cedillo, and Devin Crittle)] TO, UM, SECTION C, SECTION C RELAS REQUIRING PUBLIC HEARINGS. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS DORIAN FL. ITEM 94 IS AUGUSTA CREEK, SECTION THREE PARTIAL RE PLAT NUMBER ONE. THE SITE IS LOCATED WEST ALONG NELSON BRIDGE DRIVE WEST OF AUGUSTA PINES PARKWAY WEST, AND HOUSTON'S EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. THE PURPOSE OF THE REPLY IS TO CREATE ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT. THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM. THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS PLAT. REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON A FACE PLA OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT PER THE CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. MADAM CHAD, IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION. YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. UH, I WILL DO THAT. I JUST WANT FOR THE RECORD TO NOTE THAT WE'VE BEEN JOINED BY COMMISSIONER ROSENBERG. UM, THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 94 AUGUSTA CREEK IS OPEN. I DON'T HAVE ANYONE SIGNED IN ADVANCE. IS THERE ANYONE LISTENING WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM 94? HEARING NO RESPONSE? THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. IS THERE DISCUSSION? IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION JONES. SECOND. CLARK. CLARK. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES ITEM 95. ITEM 95 IS GLEN HAVEN CENTER. THE SITE IS LOCATED NORTH ALONG RICHMOND AVENUE, WEST OF FOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE, AND HOUSTON CORPORATE LIMITS. THE PURPOSE OF THE RE PLAT IS TO CREATE ONE COMMERCIAL RESERVE REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT PER THE CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS PLAT. MADAM CHAIR, IF IT PLEASES COMMISSION, YOU, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 95, GLEN HAVEN CENTER IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED IN ADVANCE. IS THERE ANYONE LISTENING WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM 95? HEARING NO RESPONSE? THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. ANY DISCUSSION? COMMISSIONER CLARK? I JUST, I HAVE A COMMENT. MS. FL ON THE 1 0 1, THE UH, FIRST COMMENT, THERE'S A, A TYPO THERE. JUST CORRECT IT BEFORE WE SEND IT OUT. IT SAYS AN ACCESS FORM MAY BE REQUIRED, COMMA, AND IT JUST SAYS A-T-I-O-N-S. SO YOU'RE MISSING THE WORD. SO JUST IF YOU'LL CORRECT THAT BEFORE WE SEND IT OUT. OKAY? OKAY. THAT WAS A, A COMMENT THAT'S MADE BY, UM, ANOTHER AGENCY, NOT OURS, BUT I UNDERSTAND. I'LL DOUBLE CHECK OUT, BUT I'LL CHECK IT. YES MA'AM. THANK YOU. AND THEN I MAKE THE MOTION FOR APPROVAL. OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION. COMMISSIONER CLARK, UH, IS THERE A SECOND? GARZA GARZA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 96. ITEM 96 IS HERRON LAKES ESTATES WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. THE SITE IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH GESSNER DRIVE AND 12 LAKES BOULEVARD IN HOUSTON'S EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. THE REASON FOR RELIGHT IS TO CREATE A RESERVE RESTRICTED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY AND REVISED THE BUILDING LINE ALONG 12 LAKES BOULEVARD. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO SEEKING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A RESERVE RESTRICTED TO RECREATIONAL USE, ONLY TO BE RE TO RESERVE RESTRICTED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST. THE SITE IS A PLAID, IS A REPL, A RESERVE JA [00:15:01] 10,000 SQUARE FOOT. 0.2296 ACRE TRACK CREATED WITH THE HERON LAKES ESTATES SUBDIVISION AND 2000 HIGHLIGHTED IN PINK ON THE SCREEN. AND THEN IN 2001 A 41.7, UM, 720 SQUARE FOOT. A 0.9 7 9 5 7 8 ACRE RECREATIONAL RESERVE WAS PLANTED AROUND THIS RESERVE WITH HER NESS RESERVE HER NESS. SUBDIVISION IN 2001 HIGHLIGHTED IN ORANGE ON THE SCREEN. THE RECREATIONAL RESERVE WAS NEVER DEVELOPED OR USED FOR RECREATIONAL USE. THE DEVELOPER SOLD THE RESERVE TO THE PRESENT OWNER IN 2003 AND THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN VACANT UNTIL 2003, 2004 WHEN THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT WAS DEVELOPED ON THE PROPERTY. THE RESERVE IS SEPARATED FROM THE ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD WITH A BRICK WALL. A SMALL PORTION OF THE RESERVE IS LOCATED IN THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER'S BACKYARD. THE OWNER HAS ALSO AGREED TO QUICK CLAIM THE PORTION OF THE RECREATIONAL RESERVE THAT IS PART OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER'S BACKYARD TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS PRIOR TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF THIS PLAT, THERE IS AN EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ON THE PROPERTY AND THE RE PLAT TO CHANGE THE RESTRICTION FROM RECREATIONAL TO WEST WASTEWATER. TREATMENT FACILITY WILL AID IN BRINGING THE PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE, ALLOW THE FACILITY TO REMAIN AND TO CONTINUE PROVIDING SERVICE TO THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY. HARRIS COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE POSES NO OBJECTION TO THIS REQUEST. REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS FILED SEPARATELY. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT PER THE CBC STAFF'S. RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUEST OF VARIANCE, I'M SORRY, AND APPROVE THE PLAT PER THE CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS, THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS PLAT. MADAM CHAIR PLEASES THE COMMISSION. YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. UH, THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 96, HERON LAKES ESTATES WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IS OPEN. UM, THE APPLICANT IS WITH US VIRTUALLY FOR QUESTIONS IF ANYONE HAS QUESTIONS FOR HIM. UM, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM 96? IF NOT, AND IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE ORDINANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. UM, ANY DISCUSSION? MOTION? WE HAVE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MA. IS THERE A SECOND? MANKA? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES ITEM 97. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE HOUSTON PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS DEVIN KRU. ITEM 97 IS HIDDEN VILLAS. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS NORTH ALONG BROOKLEY STREET AND EAST OF WAYSIDE DRIVE. THE PURPOSE OF THE REPL IS CREATE THREE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS ALONG A SHARED DRIVEWAY. THERE ARE NO VARIANCES BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM. AND REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL VIOLATE SEPARATELY FILED DEED RESTRICTIONS. THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE RESTRICTION IS 7,500 SQUARE FEET WITH A MINIMUM OF 60 FOOT WIDTH AT THE LOCATION OF THE BUILDING LINES STAFF'S REC, EXCUSE ME. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO DISAPPROVE THE PLAT MADAM CHAIR. IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. AND THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. OKAY, THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 97 HIDDEN VILLAS IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED IN ADVANCE. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM 97? IF NO ONE WANTS TO SPEAK, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO DISAPPROVE BECAUSE OF A DEED RESTRICTION VIOLATION. ANY DISCUSSION? IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION MOTION BALDWIN COVAR COVAR. I'M SORRY, DID YOU, OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION. BALDWIN COVAR. UM, ANY DISCUSSION? UM, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES. UM, THE ITEM IS DISAPPROVED. ITEM 98. ITEM 98 IS MARTINEZ ESTATES AT WELDON. THE SITE IS LOCATED NORTH ALONG WELDON DRIVE, WEST OF ALDEN WESTFIELD ROAD IN HOUSTON. EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. THE PURPOSE OF THE RE PLAT IS TO CREATE THREE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL [00:20:01] LOTS. THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM. THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS PLAT. THIS PLAT WAS DEFERRED AT THE LAST PLANNING COMMISSION PER THE APPLICANT'S REF REQUEST. UM, TO CONFER WITH LEGAL CONCERNING SEPARATELY FILED DE RESTRICTIONS. THE APPLICANT PROVIDED A REVISED DRAWING AND NOW THE REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS FILED SEPARATELY PER HARRIS COUNTY, UM, ENGINEER'S OFFICE. THIS, UH, THE LOTS IN THIS PLAT DOES NOT MEET TECQ REQUIREMENTS FOR LOTS RECEIVING WATER WELL AND SEPTIC. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED THAT THIS ITEM BE DEFERRED TO PROVIDE AN ALTERNATE LOT LAYOUT TO MEET TCQ REQUIREMENTS. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS DEFER THE FURTHER PLAT PER THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST. MADAM CHAIR, IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 98 MARTINEZ ESTATES AT WELDON IS CONTINUED. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK. IS THERE ANYONE LISTENING WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM 98? UM, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER. UM, IF THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, IS THERE A MOTION TO DEFER AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING MOTION ALLMAN? SECOND. SECOND, MODEST. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. ITEMS DEFERRED ITEM 99, ITEM 90, EXCUSE ME. ITEM 99 IS SAND WOOD SECTION ONE PARTIAL REPL NUMBER ONE. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH ALONG ROBIN LAKE LANE, NORTH OF BRIAR FOREST DRIVE AND EAST OF SOUTH GASNER ROAD. THE PURPOSE OF THE RE PLAT IS TO ADJUST THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS. THERE ARE NO VARIANCES BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM. AND REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE ANY RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVING THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CCPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. UH, MADAM CHAIR, I'D LIKE TO NOTE THAT I'VE BEEN IN COMMUN COMMUNICATION WITH THE PRESIDENT OF THE CIVIC CLUB THAT INITIALLY HAD CONCERNS ABOUT THE PROJECT, BUT WE ARE ABLE TO PROVIDE HIM WITH A COPY OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAT AND CONFIRMED THAT THERE ARE NO VIOLATIONS WITH THIS PLAT. UH, AND ALSO THERE'S NO WRITTEN APPROVAL NECESSARY FROM THE CIVIC CLUB TO APPROVE THE PLAT TODAY. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 99 SANDALWOOD SECTION ONE IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED IN ADVANCE. IS THERE ANYONE WITH US WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON SANDALWOOD? UH, HEARING NO RESPONSE TO PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. ANY DISCUSSION? YES. COMMISSIONER ROSENBERG. DEVIN, THIS IS REALLY SMALL. IT SAYS RELOCATING THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN I ONLY HAVE ONE SURVEY THAT SHOWS A PROPERTY LINE. IS IT A MAJOR CHANGE? NO. SO THE PROPERTY LINE THAT MIKE, SORRY ABOUT THAT. UH, THE PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE TWO LOTS IS BEING ADJUSTED 20 FEET TO THE EAST. UM, IF YOU CAN IT MAYBE LOOK, IF YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN, UH, THE PROPERTY LINE IS BEING ADJUSTED. YEAH. YEAH. CAN'T SEE NO . OKAY. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? DISCUSSION? UM, IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION SECOND. CLERK JONES CLARK. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? AYE. SORRY. OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIES ITEM 100. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS JOHN PHILLIPS. ITEM 100 IS SHAMROCK MANOR, PARTIAL REPL NUMBER FIVE. THE SUBJECT SIDE IS A NEARLY 5,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CITY LIMIT AT THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF BLARNEY STREET AND TRO STREET EAST OF SCOTT STREET AND NORTH OF SWINGLE ROAD. THE PURPOSE OF THE REPL IS TO CREATE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS. THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THE PLAT DOES NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY. WE HAVE RECEIVED NO ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS APPLICATION. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. MADAM CHAIR FOR THE COMMISSION. YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 100 SHAMROCK MANOR IS OPEN. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED IN ADVANCE. IS THERE ANYBODY WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM 100? HEARING NO RESPONSE. THE PUBLIC HEARING'S CLOSED STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. ANY DISCUSSION? IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? HEINZ? UH, MOTION HEINZ SECOND GARZA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ITEM [00:25:01] 1 0 1 HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN AND WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. [d. Subdivision Plats with Variance Requests (Aracely Rodriguez, Petra Hsia, Tammi Williamson, John Cedillo, Geoff Butler, and Devin Crittle)] THAT TAKES US TO SECTION D VARIANCES, ITEM 1 0 2. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS A RODRIGUEZ. ITEM 1 0 2 IS RILEY ESTATE. THIS IS LOCATED IN HOUSTON CITY LIMIT ALONG INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 45 AND SOUTHEAST OF EMANCIPATION AVENUE. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A SHARED DRIVEWAY DEVELOPMENT WITH THREE SINGLE FAMILY LOT AND IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A REDUCED 10 FEET FURTHER LINE INSTEAD OF THE 25 FEET BUILDER LINE ALONG I 45. HOWEVER, THIS PROPOSED LOT MAY BE RESTRICTED TO A 20 FEET FRONT BUILDER. THEREFORE, ADDITIONAL TIME IS NEEDED TO ALLOW LEGAL TO FURTHER REVIEW THIS RESTRICTION. THAT RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THE PLA FURTHER THE RESTRICTION REVIEW AND NO PUBLIC COMMENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED IN EVENTS. THANK YOU. UM, ANY QUESTIONS FOR MS. RODRIGUEZ? I DON'T HAVE ANYBODY SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER ANY DISCUSSION QUESTIONS FOR THE DEFERRAL PERIOD. COMMISSIONER VAR, I WAS JUST NOTING, NOTING THAT IT WAS RIGHT OFF I 45 AND FOR THREE DRIVEWAYS, I MEAN IT'S LIKE RIGHT THERE. I MEAN, ARE THERE ANY RESTRICTIONS? IS THAT, IS THAT PART OF WHY THIS IS BEING DEFERRED OR IS THERE NO, THE DEFER IS TO, BECAUSE ACCORDING TO THE RESTRICTION THEY MEET, THEY MAY BE SUBSTITUTE THE 20 FEET FROM BORDERLINE. OKAY. ALANDRA 45, THERE IS A, UM, A DISTANCE BETWEEN THE EDGE OF THE CURB TO THE PROPERTY LINE. IT'S ABOUT 2 52 FEET PLUS. SO THERE'S ABOUT LIKE 52 TO 64 FEET DISTANT AND I COORDINATED WITH PUBLIC WORK AND THEY SAID THAT IT'S OKAY AND I ALSO COORDINATED WITH TECH DOT AND THEY ALSO SAY THEY DON'T HAVE ANY SETBACK REGULATION. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. QUESTION. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER? I GUESS JUST A, A COMMENT, I KNOW IT'S LISTED ON THE CPC 1 0 1, BUT SINCE THEY'RE SO TIED IN THERE, THEY NEED TO PAY ATTENTION TO THAT COMMENT FROM CENTER POINT ON THE FIVE FOOT. UM, YES. BUILDING LINE REQUIREMENTS THAT THEY'RE NOT SHOWING. OKAY. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? UM, IS THERE THEN A MOTION TO DEFER ITEM 1 0 2 OR MOTION? YEAH. THANK YOU. MOTION CLARK. CLARK SECOND KOVAR. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 1 0 2 IS DEFERRED ITEM 1 0 3, ITEM 1 0 3, KELLY CHUCK EXPRESS. THE STUDY IS LOCATED IN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS SOUTH OF ARDI STREET IN NORTHEAST OF IN OF STATE HIGHWAY SIX 10. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING ONE UNRESTRICTED RESERVE AND IS REQUESTING ADVANCE TO ALLOW AN ASSISTING OFFICE TO ENCROACH FOUR INCHES INTO THE 10 FEET BORDERLINE. AND ALSO TO ALLOW A BUILDER LINE FOR AN ASSISTING COVER AREA STRUCTURE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SECOND DEFERRAL TO ALLOW TIME TO COORDINATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER REGARDING THIS EXISTING ENCROACHMENT THAT WERE BILLED IN 2021 WITHOUT PERMIT. ONE OF THE STRUCTURE APPEARED TO ENCROACH INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY AND THE APPLICANT NEED TIME TO PROVIDE REVISED INFORMATION INCLUDING A REIV REQUEST AND STIPEND. SO THAT RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THE, PER THE PLA I MEAN THE PER THE PLAT, PER THE APPLICANT REQUESTS AND NO PUBLIC COMMENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED IN ADVANCE. OKAY. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS FOR MS. RODRIGUEZ? WE DID. THE APPLICANT IS SIGNED TO SPEAK. OH, OKAY. AND I'LL CALL ON HER IN A MINUTE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MS. RODRIGUEZ? NO. UM, JOYCE OWENS, ARE YOU THERE? MS. OWENS? I GUESS MAYBE SHE WAS JUST FOR QUESTIONS, UM, BUT I DON'T HEAR FROM HER. UH, NOTE FOR THE RECORD, WE'VE BEEN JOINED BY COMMISSIONER VERA BLAND. UM, SO STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO, UM, DEFER THE ITEM. OH, SORRY, I DIDN'T SEE YOU. SORRY, LATE QUESTION. I KNOW, UH, AT THE LAST MEETING I KIND OF BROUGHT UP LIKE LINE OF SIGHT. SO THAT BUILDING THE ONE THAT'S ENCROACHING, IS THAT THE ISSUE? YES. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH. 'CAUSE UM, I I CAN SEE HOW THAT COULD POTENTIALLY CREATE A LINE OF SIGHT ISSUE. I'M NOT REALLY SURE EXACTLY HOW THE STRUCTURE IS, BUT THAT'S THE ONE IN QUESTION. YES. ALRIGHT, THANK YOU. AND THE APPLICANT IS ONE WOULD LIKE TIME TO HAVE TIME TO ADDRESS THAT ENCOURAGEMENT INTO THE RIGHT WAY. COMMISSIONER O CLARK? IT'S SIMPLE. UM, I THINK THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS JUST DID A CUT AND PASTE JOB 'CAUSE YOU HAVE THE SAME ERROR ON YOUR 1 0 1 FORM. OH, OKAY. OKAY. THANKS. OKAY, NOTED. THANK YOU. ARE, ARE THESE STRUCTURES, NEW STRUCTURES THAT [00:30:01] HAVE BEEN BUILT OR ARE THEY THEY HAVEN'T BUILT, THEY WERE BUILT BACK IN 2021 WITH PERMITS. WITHOUT PERMITS. THEY WERE BUILT WITHOUT PERMITS, YES. OKAY, SO THIS IS TO CORRECT. YEAH. AND THEY'RE COMING BACK TO BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE. OKAY. ALRIGHT. UM, OKAY, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? UM, AND MS. OWENS, ARE YOU THERE? JUST IN CASE YOU WANTED TO ACTUALLY SPEAK. UM, SO, UH, I GUESS WE WOULD BE LOOKING FOR A MOTION TO DEFER MOTION BALDWIN, BALDWIN ALLMAN ALLMAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. IT IS DEFERRED. UH, ITEM 1 0 4. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS PETRA SHAW. ITEM 1 0 4 IS CYPRESS CHURCH ESTATE. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE HOUSTON ETJ IN HARRIS COUNTY, SOUTH OF CYPRESS HUFFMEISTER ROAD IN WEST OF CYPRESS CHURCH ROAD. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A LOT AND IS REQUESTING TWO VARIANCES. THE FIRST VARIANCE IS TO ALLOW THE PROPOSED LOT TO TAKE ACCESS FROM A PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT. AND THE SECOND VARIANCE IS TO EXCEED 1400 FEET INTERSECTION SPACING BY NOT PROVIDING AN EAST, WEST STREET THROUGH THE PROPERTY. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF BOTH REQUESTS. THE SUBJECT SITE HAS BEEN TAKING ACCESS FROM A 35 FOOT EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT, WHICH WAS CREATED IN 1984 TO PROVIDE ACCESS FOR THE SUBJECT SITE AND THE ADJACENT TRACKS TO THE EAST OF CYPRESS CHURCH ROAD. DUE TO THE EXCESSIVE INTERSECTION PACING ALONG CYPRESS CHURCH ROAD AND EAST WEST STREET IS REQUIRED TO GO THROUGH THE SITE. HOWEVER, IF THE EAST WEST STREET IS TO BE PROVIDED, THE RECORDED SUBDIVISION OF HIDDEN FIELDS MEADOW TO THE EAST SHOWN IN PURPLE, WOULD PREVENT THE STREET FROM EXTENDING TO CYPRESS CHURCH ROAD. THE EX EXISTING SUBST STREET OUT OF THE RECORDED SUBDIVISION OF LANDING EAST SECTION 12 WILL BE A BETTER, WILL BE BETTER EXTENDED THROUGH THE LARGER TRACKS JUST WEST AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE TO PROVIDE AN EAST WEST STREET CONNECTION THROUGH TO CYPRESS CHURCH ROAD. BY EXTENDING THE EAST WEST STREET AND THE ALIGNMENT SHOWN THE STREET WILL CROSS THROUGH THREE PROPERTIES INSTEAD OF SIX. IN ADDITION, THE RECORDED SUBDIVISION OF HIT FIELDS MEADOWS WILL NOT HINDER THE EXTENSION OF THE EAST WEST STREET TO CYPRESS CHURCH ROAD. HARRIS COUNTY HAS NO OBJECTIONS. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MS. SHAW? UM, OKAY. OKAY. UM, THE APPLICANT IS JOYCE OWENS IS HERE. MS. OWENS, ARE YOU, ARE YOU LISTENING? UH, OKAY. SHE IS NOT HERE. I DON'T HAVE ANYBODY ELSE WHO SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? DISCUSSION. DO WE HAVE A MOTION THEN FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION MOTION CLARK CLARK GARZA GARZA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES. UM, AND I DID NOT STATE THAT, UM, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION WAS TO GRANT THE VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT ITEM 1 0 5. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS TAMMY WILLIAMSON. ITEM 1 0 5 IS DUNHAM POINT GP. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON'S EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION WITHIN NORTHWEST HARRIS COUNTY, SOUTH OF US, TWO 90 AND EAST OF THE GRAND PARKWAY WITH MULTIPLE MAJOR TH FARERS BISECTING, THE SITE, MOUND ROAD, JACK ROAD, MASON ROAD, AND KY ROAD. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A GENERAL PLAN AND IS REQUESTING TWO VARIANCES. ONE TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG MAJOR THOROUGHFARE MOUND ROAD AND TWO, TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING BY NOT PROVIDING AN EASTWEST THROUGH STREET CONNECTION BETWEEN MOUND ROAD AND JACK ROAD. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF BOTH REQUESTS. DUNHAM POINT GP IS A 1300 ACRE GENERAL PLAN OF PREDOMINANTLY SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, ALONG WITH A SCHOOL SITE DETENTION AND AREAS NOT YET IDENTIFIED. IN GENERAL, THE SUBJECT OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTS IS CONCERNING INTERNAL CIRCULATION BETWEEN INTERIOR SECTIONS. FOR THE FIRST REQUEST, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO PROVIDE ONLY ONE STREET CONNECTION SOUTH OF MOUND ROAD BETWEEN ITS INTERSECTION WITH MASON ROAD TO THE WEST AND JACK ROAD TO THE EAST. STRICT INTERPRETATION OF THE ORDINANCE WOULD REQUIRE TWO NORTH SOUTH CONNECTIONS. INSTEAD OF THE ONE PROPOSED AT LEAST EVERY 200, 2,600 FEET, APPROXIMATELY 2000 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF MOUND ROAD AND JACK ROAD IS A DRAINAGE CHANNEL THAT CONVEYS WATER FROM NORTH OF US TWO 90 SOUTH INTO CYPRESS CREEK. THIS CORNER OF THE EASTERN GP IS CLOSELY BOUNDED BY THE TWO MAJOR THOROUGHFARES ALONG MOUND ROAD. WEST OF THE CHANNEL TO THE PROPOSED PUBLIC STREET IS APPROXIMATELY 2,600 FEET. LIKEWISE FROM THE PROPOSED LOCAL STREET TO MASON ROAD. THE DEVIATION FROM THE STANDARD IS ONLY 3%. BOTH OF THESE DISTANCES MEET [00:35:01] THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE TO ALLOW FOR SU SUFFICIENT CONNECTIVITY TO MAJOR THOROUGHFARES TO DISTRIBUTE LARGER VOLUMES OF TRAFFIC. THE SECOND REQUEST IS TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING BETWEEN MOUND ROAD AND JACK ROAD. BY NOT PROVIDING AN EAST WEST PUBLIC STREET CONNECTION. THERE IS PROPOSED A SINGULAR PUBLIC STREET CONNECTION NORTHWARD FROM SECTION 10 ACROSS THE PROPOSED DETENTION AREA THROUGH THE FUTURE SECTION AND EVENTUALLY MAKE ITS WAY TO THE SINGULAR PROPOSED STREET CONNECTION TO MOUND ROAD. THE SAME MOUND ROAD INTERSECTION IS PROPOSED TO HAVE A CONNECTION SOUTH BUT EAST OF THE DETENTION AREA. YOU CAN SEE THE LITTLE PATH THERE BETWEEN SECTION 10 AND SECTION 13 WHERE THERE ARE TWO MORE POINTS OF CONNECTION TO JACK ROAD. THE DETENTION PONDS ALONG JACK ROAD HAVE ALREADY BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ADDITION TO A PORTION OF THE POND NORTH OF SECTION 10 THAT IS REQUIRED TO BE EXPANDED. THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE GRID WITHIN THIS GP IS IN RELATIVE CLOSE PROXIMITY. THE INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG MASON ROAD BETWEEN MOUND ROAD AND JACK ROAD MEETS THE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT REQUIRING A PUBLIC STREET CONNECTION. LIKEWISE CROSSING THE DRAINAGE CHANNEL. BESIDES MAJOR TH FARS MOUND ROAD AND JACK ROAD IS NOT REQUIRED. THE DETENTION PONDS AND THE MAJOR TFA GRID ARE THEIR PRIMARY JUSTIFICATIONS FOR SUPPORTING THE VARIANCE REQUESTS. HARRIS COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUESTS. THEREFORE, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCES AND APPROVE THE GP SUBJECT TO CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED PUBLIC COMMENTS AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS. OKAY, THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MS. WILLIAMSON? UM, SO I DON'T HAVE ANY, WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE SIGNED. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO SPEAK OR JUST HERE FOR QUESTIONS? JUST QUESTIONS. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. IF THERE'S NO DISCUSSION, UM, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS BEFORE YOU ON THE SCREEN TO GRANT THE VARIANCE TO APPROVE THE PLA SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. ANY DISCUSSION? IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? KLIK SECOND JONES. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. 1 0 6 GLEN LOCK PATIO HOMES. ITEM 1 0 6 IS GLEN LOCK PATIO HOMES GP. THE SUBJECT SIDE IS A NEARLY 24 ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HARRIS COUNTY EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION WEST ALONG UBMA AIRLINE STREET AND SOUTH OF SPRING CYPRESS. THE APPLICANT HAS PRESENTED A GENERAL PLAN, PROPOSED TO BE A SINGULAR UNRESTRICTED RESERVE INTENDED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE AND HAS REQUESTED TWO VARIANCES. ONE TO NOT EXTEND NOR TERMINATE IN A CUL-DE-SAC SUITE. MEADOW DRIVE ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY AND TWO, TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING BY NOT PROVIDING AN EAST, WEST STREET THROUGH THE PROPERTY. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCES. THE SUBJECT SITE IS BORDERED TO THE SOUTH AND WEST BY THE NORTH OAKS BAPTIST CHURCH. AND FURTHERMORE BY THE OAK, UH, OAKWOOD G GLEN CREST SUBDIVISION AND IS BORDERED TO THE NORTH BY EXISTING COMMERCIAL AND WAREHOUSE USED AS WELL AS A, UH, DRAINAGE CREEK WITHOUT THE EXTENSION OF SWEET MEADOW. THE SITE EXCEEDS INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY TO 1,534 FEET, WHICH IS A 10% LESS THAN A 10% DEVIATION FROM THE STANDARD. THE INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG SUPER AIRLINE EXCEEDS ONE, UH, 3,120 FEET, WHICH IS ONLY A 20% DEVIATION FROM THE STANDARD GRANTING THE REQUEST OF VARIANCES WOULD NOT BE INJURIOUS TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY. REQUIRING THE EXTENSION OF SWEET MEADOW TO THE SOUTH AND AN EAST, WEST STREET TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT DEFIED THE CHURCH PROPERTY TO THE WEST AND NOT GREATLY IMPACT TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IN THE ADJACENT SUBDIVISION. PUSHING TRAFFIC BACK TO SUMER AIRLINE AS IT ALREADY GOES, ALREADY FLOWS. HARRIS COUNTY G ENGINEER HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUESTED VARIANCE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCES AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS. MADAM CHAIR, THIS CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. A ANY QUESTIONS FROM MR. CILLO? UM, WE HA UH, OKAY. UM, I DON'T HAVE ANYBODY ELSE SIGNED. NO SPEAKERS. UM, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT. ANY DISCUSSION? IS THERE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION? MOTION MAR SECOND. MAD PARKER AKAKA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 1 0 7 HOLLISTER BREEN. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF EASTERN PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS JEFF BUTLER. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE ETJ WITHIN HARRIS COUNTY, ALONG HOLLISTER STREET BETWEEN BREEN AND GULF BANK. THE APPLICANT IS PRO PROPOSES A GENERAL PLAN OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ALONG TYPE TWO PAES. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING REQUIREMENTS BY NOT EXTENDING HANNAN DRIVE THROUGH THE SITE, NOR TERMINATING WITH A CUL-DE-SAC STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST. THE SITE IS LOCATED ON A MOSTLY UNIMPROVED SEGMENT OF HOLLISTER STREET. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT THE EASTERN PORTION OF HOLLISTER [00:40:01] BETWEEN THEIR SOUTHERN ENTRANCE AND FLEETWOOD CREEK WAY. STAFF FINDS THAT WHEN COMBINED WITH FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG HOLLISTER, THE SITE WILL BE ADEQUATELY SERVED BY THIS THOROUGHFARE. IN LIEU OF A SECOND CONNECTION TO HANNON DRIVE, HARRIS COUNTY OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER AND THE CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT A HAVE EXPRESSED SUPPORT FOR THIS APPLICATION. STAFF RECOMMENDS GRANTING THE VARIANCE IN APPROVING THE GP PER THE CPC ONE ONE FORM CONDITIONS. WE'VE RECEIVED NO ADVANCE WRITTEN COMMENT. THIS ITEM, AND THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION. THANK YOU MR. BUTLER. WE DO HAVE A SPEAKER, UH, COUNCIL MEMBER AMY PECK, DISTRICT A WELCOME TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, . THANK YOU AND GOOD AFTERNOON. I'M HERE TODAY TO, UM, TALK TO YOU ABOUT THIS ITEM I AM IN, IN SUPPORT OF THIS VARIANCE. UM, THE ORIGINAL PLAN FOR THIS WAS TO PUSH TRAFFIC THROUGH AN EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD IN DISTRICT A AND THEY REALLY HAD NO REASON THAT THEY HAD TO DO THIS CHANGE. UM, BUT JUST TRYING TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR IN THIS AREA. THEY ARE NOW, UM, SPENDING MORE MONEY TO DIVERT THE TRAFFIC, UM, OVER HERE SO THEY'RE NOT IMPACTING AN EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD. SO I REALLY APPRECIATE, UM, DR HORTON AND EVERYONE WHO WORKED ON THIS PLAN TO MAKE IT BETTER FOR EVERYONE IN THAT AREA. THANK YOU. THANKS FOR YOUR INVOLVEMENT, YOU IN THE PROJECT. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR COUNCIL MEMBER? OKAY. THANKS YOU FOR BEING HERE TODAY. UM, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ELSE WHO IS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK? OKAY. QUESTIONS FOR MR. BUTLER. UM, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. ANY DISCUSSION? COMMISSIONER COLVARD? I WAS, OH NO. COMMISSIONER MODEST. YEAH. SECOND CALL? NO. OKAY. MOTION SECOND. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION. MAD VAR, MAD AND A SECOND. COVAR. UH, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. UH, AND THAT'LL TAKE US TO 1 0 8. ITEM 1 0 8 IS STAR WINDOWS BUSINESS CENTER. THIS SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HARRIS COUNTY AT THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF ASHWORTH STREET AND MAGNOLIA STREET. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING AN UNRESTRICTED RESERVE AND IS REQUESTING A DUAL BUILDING LINE VARIANCE OF SIX AND A HALF FEET FOR A STRUCTURE ALONG MAGNOLIA STREET, WHICH IS AN UNIMPROVED RIGHT OF WAY. THIS ITEM WAS SUBMITTED IN APRIL OF 2023, BUT WAS, BUT WAS WITHDRAWN DUE TO SOME DISCREPANCIES ON THE SITE. STAFF RECOMMENDS DEFERRING THE PLA TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE APPLICANT TO MAKE CORRECTIONS TO THE SITE PLAN AND CONSIDER POSSIBLE PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE ASHWORTH RIGHT OF WAY. MADAM CHAIR THIS, EXCUSE ME, THIS ISN'T A PUBLIC HEARING, UH, BUT THIS DOES CONCLUDE MY PRESENTATION AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM MR. CRIDDLE? UM, I DON'T HAVE ANYONE SIGNED. WE DON'T HAVE ANYBODY WHO WANTS TO SPEAK ON 1 0 8. UM, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER ANY REQUESTS DISCUSSION FOR THE DEFERRAL PERIOD. UH, THEN IS THERE A MOTION TO DEFER ITEM 1 0 8? MOTION CLERK CLARK VIERA BLAND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. UH, WE THAT CONCLUDES VARIANCES AND WE HAVE NO SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS OR RECONSIDERATION OF REQUIREMENTS. [Platting Activities g - i] SO WE MOVE ON TO SECTIONS, GH AND I. GOOD AFTERNOON, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS ANTONIA JOHNSON. IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, STAFF WOULD LIKE TO TAKE SECTIONS GH AND I AS ONE GROUP? YES, PLEASE. SECTIONS G EXTENSIONS OF APPROVAL CONSISTS OF ITEMS 109 THROUGH 119 SECTION H NAME CHANGES CONSIST OF ITEMS ONE 20, UM, SECTION I CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CONSISTS OF ITEMS 1 21 AND 1 22. THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUEST THE APPRO, EXCUSE ME, THE APPROVAL OF ALL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SECTIONS GH AND I. THANK YOU. UH, ANY DISCUSSION? IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION? CLARK CLARK SECOND COLLE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES. THEY ARE ALL APPROVED. WE HAVE NOTHING UNDER SECTION J. UH, [k. Development Plats with Variance Requests (Geoff Butler)] SECTION K IS DEVELOPMENT PLOTS WITH VARIANCE REQUESTS. ITEM 1 23. ITEM 1 23 IS 1701 HABER STREET. THIS ITEM IS DEFERRED AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON'S CORPORATE LIMIT ALONG HABER AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF WINDSOR. THE APPLICANT INITIALLY REQUESTED A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR A ZERO FOOT BUILDING LINE TO ENCLOSE AN EXISTING CARPORT ALONG WINDSOR IN LOCATING VEHICULAR ACCESS ALONG THE ALLEYWAY. THE APPLICANT IS NOW PROPOSING A NEW CARPORT STRUCTURE FACING THE ALLEYWAY AND IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR A FIVE FOOT BUILDING LINE ALONG WINDSOR STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST. THE SITE CONSISTS OF AN EXISTING DUPLEX LOCATED WITHIN THE CHERRY HEARST COMMUNITY. THE EXISTING STRUCTURE FEATURES AN [00:45:01] ATTACHED WINDSOR LOADING CARPORT STRUCTURE BUILT ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE. THE APPLICANT INITIALLY SOUGHT TO ENCLOSE THIS CARPORT AND DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE ABUTTING ALLEY REVIEW BY LEGAL DETERMINED THAT THIS WOULD VIOLATE DEED RESTRICTIONS THAT REQUIRE A COMBINED EIGHT FOOT SETBACK ON EACH SIDE OF THE LOT. THE APPLICANT HAS SINCE VISED THE PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT A NEW ALLEY LOADING CARPORT THAT WILL BE SET BACK FIVE FEET FROM THE WINDSOR PROPERTY LINE. THIS WOULD ELIMINATE A POTENTIAL HAZARD TO PEDESTRIANS AS VEHICLES WILL BE LIMITED TO A SHAREPOINT OF ACCESS WITH OTHER HOMES ON THE BLOCK CORNER. LOTS WITH SHALLOW SETBACKS AND ALLEY ACCESS ARE COMMON IN THIS COMMUNITY. SO THE REQUESTED VARIANCE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE BUILDING LINE REQUIREMENT AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. STAFF HAS RECEIVED A WRITTEN COMMENT FROM THE CHAIR, HEARST DEED RESTRICTIONS COMMITTEE WHO OFFERED THEIR SUPPORT FOR THIS, THE REVISED VERSION OF THIS REQUEST. THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. UH, OKAY, WE DO HAVE SPEAKERS. UM, ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. BUTLER? YES. COMMISSIONER ROSENBERG. UH, MR. BUTLER, DID YOU GUYS LOOK AT THE WOOD FENCE ENCROACHMENT UNDER WINDSOR? YES, SIR. THEY, UM, WE SPOKE WITH PERMITTING. THE, THE FENCE ITSELF IS PRETTY SUBSTANTIAL. IT'S A BRICK COLUMN FENCE. UM, SO IT IS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY, BUT AS LONG AS THEY'RE NOT TOUCHING IT OR ALTERING IT, THEY CAN LEAVE IT AS IT IS. IT'S OKAY TO STAY WHERE IT IS. AND THE SAME FOR THE STRUCTURE, THE ENCROACHING STRUCTURE THAT'S NOT BEING TOUCHED, CORRECT? CORRECT. OKAY. SO ALL WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IS THE CARPORT AREA. THAT'S RIGHT. AREA. AND NOW THE NEW PLAN DOES NOT VIOLATE DE RESTRICTIONS, IT'LL SOLVE THE PROBLEM. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS BEFORE I CALL SPEAKERS? OH, I DON'T THINK I NOTED THAT COMMISSIONER TAHIR HAS JOINED US. OH, OKAY. I WAS GONNA SAY, DID YOU COME EARLIER? OKAY. UM, THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO THE FIRST SPEAKER IS AMINA, UH, PERVEZ. WHO IS THE APPLICANT? GOOD AFTERNOON. UM, I'M AMINA PERVEZ. UH, AS YOU GUYS HAVE HEARD FROM JEFF, WE'VE COMPLIED WITH ALL OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS, SO WE'RE NO LONGER VIOLATING ANY OF THEM. UM, I DON'T REALLY HAVE MUCH ELSE TO SAY. I THOUGHT I WAS GONNA NEED TO EXPLAIN THINGS MORE, BUT I THINK JEFF COVERED EVERYTHING. IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE SPEAKER? OKAY. GLAD YOU WORKED EVERYTHING OUT. THANK YOU. UM, OKAY. SECOND SPEAKER IS DIEGO ANO MR. TAO? YES. HI. HI. GOOD AFTERNOON. UM, SO, UM, I THINK MR. JEFF, UM, PUT EVERYTHING ON THE TABLE. WE FINALLY FOUND A MIRACLE THAT YOU WERE REQUESTING TWO WEEKS AGO. . WE CAME BACK HOME WITH THE HOPE THAT WE CAN FIND A WAY. WE HAD A MEETING WITH THE NEIGHBORS, LIKE OUTSIDE OF THE CITY RESTRICTIONS, AND WE DID A REALLY NICE, UM, CONVERSATION GROUP TO FIND THE SOLUTION. AND ONE OF THE NEIGHBORS WENT TO THE DEEP RESTRICTION AND FIND OUT THERE IS A WAY TO SET BACK AND COMPLY WITH THE DEED AND THE CITY. SO WE ARE, WE ARE HAPPY TO FIND THAT SOLUTION. THANK YOU. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. WE, WE HAD GREAT CONFIDENCE IN YOU THAT YOU WOULD ALL GET TOGETHER AND FIND A SOLUTION. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANKS. ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE HE? OKAY. UH, NEXT SPEAKER IS JUNIOR DAVIS IS NOT PRESENT. AND, UM, I'M SORRY, BEN, UH, SUS, SU SUS NOT PRESENT. AND TREVOR JEFFRIES? YES. HI, THIS IS TREVOR JEFFRIES. HI. GO. CAN YOU HEAR ME? CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, WE CAN GO AHEAD. OKAY. OKAY, GREAT. UM, I, UH, I DO LEAD THE DEED RESTRICTION COMMITTEE AT CHERRY HURST. WE DID COME TO AN AGREEMENT ON THE SETBACK. WE ALSO ASKED FOR REVISED DRAWINGS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE HEIGHT LIMITATIONS WERE, WERE ALSO MET AND THEY APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN MET AS WELL. THE ONLY CAVEAT I HAVE TO THIS IS THAT THE FENCE LINE IS OVER THREE FEET BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINE. AND WE WOULD ASK THAT THE CITY, UH, CONDITION OF VARIANCE, THE FIVE FOOT SETBACK, UH, VARIANCE ON THE CONDITION THAT THE FENCE BE MOVED TO BE ON OR WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINE. OKAY. UM, THANK YOU FOR WE, WE HEAR YOUR REQUEST. I THINK THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT HAS DETERMINED THAT SINCE THEY'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING TO THE FENCE THAT THE FENCES HAS THAT GRANDFATHER STATUS [00:50:01] FOR, FOR THE TIME BEING. UM, BUT GO AHEAD. UH, YEAH, I WAS JUST GONNA ADD THAT THE LAST DRAWING I SAW SHOWED THAT THEY WERE, THEY WERE GOING TO CONSTRUCT A NEW WALL TO GO ACROSS THE PROPERTY LINE. AND THAT WAS, UH, THE REASON WE ASKED. OKAY. UM, MR. BUTLER, WHAT'S YOUR UNDERSTANDING? NEW, NEW CONSTRUCTION WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY? OF COURSE, IT, IT'S, IT WOULD FOR, I, WE, WE HAD A CONVERSATION WITH THE APPLICANT YESTERDAY JUST CLARIFYING THAT THEY ARE INDEED KEEPING THE FENCE AS IT IS. UM, AND, AND BASED ON THE NATURE OF THE FENCE, IT'S A MASONRY STRUCTURE, SO IT CAN'T BE EASILY MOVED. SO AS LONG AS THEY'RE NOT ALTERING IT OR TOUCHING IT, IT CAN STAY WHERE IT IS. OKAY. DID YOU HEAR THAT MR. JEFFRIES? I, I DID, BUT I LIVE RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET AND THERE IS A MASONRY CORNER TO IT, BUT THE REST OF IT IS WOOD. AND THE DRAWING THAT I SAW SHOWED THAT A NEW WALL WAS GOING TO BE CONSTRUCTED FROM THE CARPORT WALL, WALL EXTENDING PERPENDICULAR ACROSS THE PROPERTY LINE BY ABOUT THREE FEET. AND THAT'S WHAT I WAS CONCERNED WITH AND I THOUGHT THAT THAT SHOULD BE MOVED. OKAY. SO WHAT'S BEING APPROVED IS WITHIN THE PROPERTY. IF THEY DEVIATE FROM THAT, THEN THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD IT IT WOULD NOT BE PERMITTABLE. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT'S THE ANSWER. SO ANYTHING THAT WE ARE CONCERNED WITH HERE HAS BEEN, HAS BEEN CHANGED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH RESTRICTIONS, RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT. UH, OKAY. THANK YOU MR. JEFFRIES. UM, DO WE, THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON ITEM 1 23 17 0 1 HAVER? ANY DISCUSSION? COMMISSIONER MODEST. COULD A NOTE BE ADDED? THAT SAID, SHOULD THE FENCE BE TOUCHED AT A FUTURE DATE, THEN THEY WOULD NEED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE. I, I GET THAT THEY'RE NOT TOUCHING IT TODAY, THEREFORE IT DOESN'T MATTER. BUT LIKE, SAY 10 YEARS FROM NOW, THEY DECIDE TO GO MODIFY THAT. LIKE, YEAH, I DON'T THINK THAT IT'S NOT, WE'RE NOT CONCERNED WITH SOMETHING THAT THEY'RE NOT DOING. I MEAN, OKAY. I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE OUTSIDE, OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE APPLICA CURRENT APPLICATION. RIGHT. IT'D BE OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE CURRENT APPLICATION. WELL, I, I GUESS I JUST KINDA ASK 'CAUSE IT DOESN'T TYPICALLY GET PERMITTED. RIGHT. SO PEOPLE TEND TO JUST GO BUILD FENCES AND TRUE. THE CONCERN WOULD BE THAT I HAVE A FEELING THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD PROBABLY ENFORCE THAT. YEAH. YEAH. I, I THINK THERE'S A, A SELF ENFORCING THING GOING ON. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS ON THIS? UM, OKAY. A STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION. YES. UH, WE HAVE A MOTION. KALI SECOND CLARK. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? AYE. OH, SORRY. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES. UM, THANK YOU. [II. Establish a public hearing date of April 4, 2024] OKAY. WE GO TO ROMAN NUMERAL TWO, UM, AND WE WOULD LIKE TO ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF APRIL 4TH, 2024 ON THE APPLICATIONS THAT APPEAR ON YOUR SCREEN, BUT THEY DON'T, SO I'M GONNA READ 'EM REAL QUICK. , UM, BELFORT VILLAGE, UM, KATIE GASTON, RETAIL CENTER, LEXINGTON PLACE, MANCHESTER BUSINESS PARK, AND ROSEMARY GARDENS. IS THERE A MOTION TO SET? APRIL 4TH. MOTION CLARK ALLMAN ALLMAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES. UM, THEN [III. Consideration of an Off-Street Parking Variance at 201 Eastwood Street (Geoff Butler)] WE WILL MOVE TO ROMAN NUMERAL THREE, WHICH IS CONSIDERATION OF AN OFF STREET PARKING VARIANCE FOR 2 0 1 EASTWOOD STREET. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON'S CORPORATE LIMIT, NORTH OF HARRISBURG, SOUTH OF CANAL, AND WEST OF LOCKWOOD. THE APPLICANT IS RETROFITTING, RETROFITTING AN EXISTING MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURE TO DEVELOP 11 EFFICIENCY IN ONE BEDROOM. HOMES. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM THE OFF STREET PARKING ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE NO ON STREET PARKING AS OPPOSED TO REQUIRED 14 SPACES. STAFF RECOMMENDS DEFERRAL TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE APPLICANT TO SURVIVE, SUBMIT REVISED MATERIALS, AND TO CON CONDUCT A SITE VISIT TO EXAMINE EXISTING CONDITIONS. WE'VE RECEIVED NO ADVANCE WRITTEN COMMENT. THIS ITEM, THIS CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION. OKAY. THANK YOU. UM, I DON'T HAVE ANYONE WHO SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THIS. DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS ON ROMAN NUMERAL THREE? UM, IF NOT, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. BUTLER? UM, AND THEN HOW, HOW FAR ARE THEY FROM A RAIL LINE OR TOD LINE OR ANYTHING? SO THEY'RE ABOUT A BLOCK AND A HALF FROM A TYPE ONE TOD STREET, WHICH WOULD GIVE THEM, UM, AN EXEMPTION AND ACROSS THE STREET FROM A TYPE TWO, WHICH WOULD GIVE THEM 50% OFF. OKAY. UH, THEN DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO DEFER BALDWIN SECOND GARZA? GARZA? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES. UM, THAT CONCLUDES ALL OUR BUSINESS. EXCEPT [00:55:01] FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. I DON'T HAVE ANYONE WHO SIGNED UP TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT THIS TIME? IF NOT, A MOTION TO ADJOURN WOULD BE IN ORDER. MOTION GARZA, SECOND CLARK. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES. WE ARE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.