[00:00:08]
WE'LL BE HAVING A[Call to Order]
MEETING TODAY.IT IS TWO 30 ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27TH, 2022.
TODAY'S MEETING OF THE HOUSTON PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S.
I'M COMMISSIONER GARZA AND I'LL BE REPLACING OUR CHAIR, MARTY SPINE.
MARTY STEIN TODAY TO ESTABLISH THAT WE HAVE A QUORUM OF 11 MEMBERS, BOTH IN PERSON AND ONLINE.
I WILL NOW CALL THE ROLE THE CHAIR.
VI UH, THE CHAIRMAN, MARTY STEIN IS NOT PRESENT.
DAVID ABRAHAM WILL NOT BE PRESENT TODAY.
I'M NERVOUS AND HAVE NO VOICE.
UM, PAUL NELSON IS NOT PRESENT.
LINDA POR PERLE IS NOT PRESENT.
KEVIN ROBBINS WILL NOT BE PRESENT TODAY.
UM, IAN ROSENBERG PRESENT, UH, MEGAN ZIEGLER IS NOT PRESENT.
UM, SHAR TO TAHIR IS NOT PRESENT.
MIRA VICTOR PRESENT IS PRESENT.
SCOTT KANE PRESENT VIRTUALLY IS PRESENT VIRTUALLY MAGGIE DALTON.
WHERE'S MY LIST? MARGARET WALLACE BROWN IS PRESENT.
IS THERE ANYONE ELSE, UH, COMMISSIONERS WHO IS PRESENT, WHOSE NAME I FAILED TO CALL? HEARING NONE.
THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.
ALRIGHT, FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE, AGAIN, LET ME FIND MY NOTES.
OUR MEETING FORMAT PROVIDES THAT PLANNING COMMISSIONERS MAY PARTICIPATE EITHER IN PERSON OR VIRTUALLY ON MICROSOFT TEAMS. UM, TO COMPLY WITH TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS LAW, THAT CHAIR OR ACTING CHAIR MUST BE PHYSICALLY PRESENT.
ALL COMMISSIONERS PARTICIPATING VIRTUALLY MUST REMAIN BOTH AUDIBLE AND VISIBLE.
AND AT QUORUM THE COMMISSION MUST BE MAINTAINED COLLECTIVELY.
COMMISSIONERS, IF YOU ARE WITH US ON TEAMS, PLEASE REMEMBER, UH, TO KEEP YOUR CAMERA ON SO WE CAN CONTINUE TO COUNTER FOR QUORUM.
AND IF ANY COMMISSIONER NEEDS TO LEAVE THE MEETING, ESPECIALLY SINCE WE JUST HAVE QUORUM, UM, WHETHER YOU ARE PHYSICALLY PRESENT OR VIRTUAL, UH, VIRTUAL, PLEASE ANNOUNCE FOR THE RECORD THAT YOU ARE LEAVING AND JOINING.
UM, TODAY, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, IF YOU'RE SPEAKING ON A SPECIFIC ITEM, YOU CAN FIND THE FINAL AGENDA WITH THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT'S WEBSITE.
ALL ADVANCE WRITTEN COMMENTS THAT WERE RECEIVED BY NOON YESTERDAY ARE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL AGENDA.
IF YOU ARE WITH US TODAY BY PHONE OR COMPUTER, PLEASE KEEP YOUR DEVICE MUTED UNTIL YOU ARE CALLED ON TO SPEAK.
ALSO, OUR VIDEO QUALITY WILL BE BETTER IF YOU KEEP YOUR CAMERA OFF UNTIL YOU ARE SPEAKING.
ALRIGHT, LASTLY, BEFORE WE GO TO PUBLIC HEARINGS, JUST BASIC RULES FOR PUBLIC SPEAKERS.
UM, FOR EACH ITEM, THE APPLICANT WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK AND THEN FOR A REBUTTAL.
AT THE CONCLUSION, UH, OF ALL OTHER SPEAKERS, SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER.
SPEAKERS WHO ARE SIGNED UP IN ADVANCE, SPEAKERS WHO ARE ATTENDING IN PERSON, SPEAKERS WHO ARE SIGNED IN TODAY'S CHAT AND ANYONE ELSE WHO IS JOINING US WILL BE CALLED AT THE END, THE CHAIR OR STAFF WILL ANNOUNCE EACH SPEAKER, SPELL THE LAST NAME IF AVAILABLE, AND THEN THE CHAIR WILL CALL ON YOU.
IF YOU'RE IN THE LAST GROUP, PLEASE WAIT UNTIL THE CHAIR ASKS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL SPEAKERS AT WHICH TIME YOU SHOULD UNMUTE AND ANNOUNCE THAT YOU WANT TO SPEAK.
EACH SPEAKER WILL HAVE TWO MINUTES UNLESS YOU SPOKE PREVIOUSLY, IN WHICH CASE YOU WILL HAVE ONE MINUTE.
AGAIN, A REMINDER, PLEASE KEEP YOUR PHONE OR COMPUTER ON MUTE UNLESS THE CHAIR IS CALLED ON YOU TO SPEAK OR UNLESS THE CHAIR HAS MADE A GENERAL CALL.
IF YOU'RE ON THE PHONE, PLEASE USE STAR SIX TO MUTE AND UNMUTE.
ALRIGHT THEN WITH THAT, THIS MEETING OFFICIALLY IS CALLED ORDER DIRECTOR, UH, MARGARET WALLACE BROWN
[Director’s Report]
WILL GIVE THE DIRECTOR'S REPORT.GOOD AFTERNOON, MI, MR. VICE-CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS.
MY NAME IS MARGARET WALLACE BROWN, SECRETARY TO THE COMMISSION AND DIRECTOR OF THE HOUSTON PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
UM, AS YOU ALL KNOW, UH, WE HAVE PROPOSED A CHANGE TO THE BUFFERING AND UM, SCREENING ORDINANCES FOR THE CITY OF HOUSTON.
THOSE, UM, WE'VE PRESENTED THAT TO YOU.
THE PUBLIC COMMENT IS OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 30TH.
UM, IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO READ AND COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED CHANGES, YOU CAN GO TO THE LET'S TALK HOUSTON WEBPAGE, UM, WHICH IS AT THE, UM, HOUSTON TX.GOV/PLANNING PAGE OR JUST GO TO HOUSTON PLANNING.COM AND YOU CAN NAVIGATE FROM THERE.
WE WOULD LIKE YOUR COMMENTS, UH, NEXT WEEK, PLEASE COME SLIGHTLY EARLY FOR OUR MEETING.
I'M SORRY, NEXT MEETING IN TWO WEEKS, UM, ON NOVEMBER 10TH.
PLEASE COME AT TWO 15 BECAUSE IT IS OUR
[00:05:01]
ANNUAL GROUP PHOTOGRAPH.UM, AND CONSIDER WEARING VIBRANT COLORS IS WHAT I'M BEING TOLD.
UM, IN CLOSING, IF YOU, THAT'S THE END OF MY REPORT.
IN CLOSING, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, YOU CAN CALL THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT (832) 393-6600 OR YOU CAN CALL THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNER OF THE DAY AT 8 3 2 3 9 3 6 6 2 4.
OR YOU CAN ALWAYS VISIT OUR WEBSITE@HOUSTONPLANNING.COM AND GO ASTROS.
THANK YOU, DIRECTOR MARGARET WALLACE BROWN.
ALRIGHT, WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO THE
[Approval of the October 13, 2022 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes]
APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 13TH, 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.UH, COMMISSIONERS, THOSE WERE IN YOUR PACKETS.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR CHANGES? HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION? CLARK CLARK SECOND MAD.
[I. Presentation and consideration of the 2023 Planning Commission meeting dates (Hector Rodriguez)]
ONE PRESENTATION AND CONSIDERATION OF THE 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATES.UH, MR. RODRIGUEZ, GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
UH, BEFORE YOU TODAY FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IS THE 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION, UH, SCHEDULED DATES.
ALL MEETINGS ARE HELD HERE AT CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ANNEX, AND VIRTUALLY VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS BEGINNING AT 2:30 PM ON A THURSDAY.
TYPICALLY FOLLOWING, FOLLOWING A BIWEEKLY SCHEDULE, THE THREE WEEK CYCLE OCCURS AROUND THE CITY'S ADOPTED HOLIDAY SCHEDULES SUCH AS 4TH OF JULY, THANKSGIVING, CHRISTMAS, NEW YEAR'S SUBDIVISION PLANS.
THE SUBMITTAL PERIODS OPEN AT 6:00 AM ON FRIDAY FOLLOWING A, A COMMISSION MEETING AND CLOSES ON MONDAY, UH, 11:00 AM ON HOLIDAYS.
THE SUBMITTAL PERIOD IS EXTENDED TO TUESDAYS AND ON VERY RARE OCCASIONS, WE EXTEND IT UP TO WEDNESDAY.
I THINK THERE'S ONE ON THE AGENDA.
UH, MAJOR THOROUGH AFFAIRS AND FREE PLAN MEETINGS ARE TYPICALLY HELD DURING THE SUMMER MONTHS ON ALTERNATE DATES THURSDAYS, UH, FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS, UM, THE ADOPTED DATES WILL BE PUBLISHED IN THE NEWSPAPER BEFORE JANUARY.
THE FIRST STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE 2023 PLAN COMMISSION SCHEDULE.
MADAM MR. CHAIR, THAT CONCLUDES MY, MY PRESENTATIONS.
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU MR. RODRIGUEZ.
COMMISSIONERS, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. RODRIGUEZ BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD? ALL RIGHT.
HEARING NONE, UH, AGAIN, THIS IS A PRESENTATION CONSIDERATION OF THE 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ME MEETING DATES.
UH, IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? MOTION BALDWIN BALDWIN.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
[II. Presentation and consideration of the 2023 Planning Commission Chapter 26 submittal dates (Hector Rodriguez)]
TWO.PRESENTATION AND CONSIDERATION OF THE 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION.
MR. RODRIGUEZ, ON MARCH 1ST, UH, 2017, CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 26.
THE OFF THREE PARKING ORDINANCE, THE AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 26 4 78 REQUIRES A COMMISSION TO APPROVE AN ANNUAL CALENDAR.
THE DETAILS, THE SUBMISSION PERIODS FOR EACH TYPE OF APPLICATION THAT REQUIRES APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
ONCE APPROVED, THE DIRECTOR IS REQUIRED TO POST THE CALENDAR ON THE DEPARTMENT'S WEBSITE.
UH, BEFORE YOU TODAY FOR YOUR APPROVAL IS THE SUBMITTAL SCHEDULE FOR PARKING, VARIANCES AND SPECIAL PARKING AREA APPLICATIONS THAT RELATES TO EXISTING PLAN COMMISSION MEETING DATES FOR THE 2023 CALENDAR YEAR.
UH, MR. CHAIR, UH, THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
ALL RIGHT, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, ARE THERE QUESTIONS, UM, ABOUT THE, UH, SUBMITTAL DATES FOR CHAPTER 26? HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? MOTION JONES.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
ALRIGHT, WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO ROMAN
[Platting Activities a & b]
THREE.PLANNING ACTIVITY SECTIONS A AND B.
GOOD AFTERNOON MR. CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
SECTIONS A AND B ARE PRESENTED AS ONE GROUP, WHICH INCLUDES CONSENT AND REPLANT ITEMS NOT REQUIRING NOTIFICATION.
SECTIONS A AND B ARE ITEMS ONE THROUGH 1 0 4 SECTION A.
CONSENT ITEMS ARE NUMBERS ONE THROUGH 62 AND SECTION B REPLANT ITEMS ARE NUMBER 63 THROUGH 1 0 4.
NO ITEMS NEED TO BE TAKEN OUT OF CHARTER ORDER AND THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO STAFF.
RECOMMENDATIONS MR. CHAIR, IF THERE ARE NO INDIVIDUALS SIGN UP TO SPEAK ON THESE ITEMS. THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUEST THE APPROVAL OF ALL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSENT AND REPLANT ITEMS NOT REQUIRING NOTIFICATION.
[00:10:01]
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, I SHALL NO ONE SIGN TO SPEAK ON THESE ITEMS. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS ITEMS ONE THROUGH 1 0 4? ALRIGHT, SEEING NONE WE WILL MOVE FORWARD.COMMISSIONERS, ARE THERE ANY ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE TAKEN FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION? THAT'S A FIRST.
SO HEARING NONE LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE LOOKING AT SECTIONS A AND B, ITEMS ONE THROUGH 62 AND 63 THROUGH 1 0 4.
SINCE THERE ARE NO SPEAKERS AND NO ITEMS TO BE TAKEN SEPARATELY, IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? VICTOR AND MAD, HOW'S THAT VICTOR? AND MAD QUESTIONS.
HEARING NONE THE MOTION PASSES.
WERE THERE ANY ABSTENTIONS MR. CHAIR? NOTE THAT I SAID THERE WERE NO EXTENSIONS THAT I'M AWARE OF.
ALRIGHT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO SECTION C
[c. Replats requiring Public Hearings with Notification (Dorianne Powe-Phlegm, Devin Crittle, Arum Lee, Aracely Rodriguez and John Cedillo)]
NUMBER 1 0 5.GOOD AFTERNOON MR. CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
ITEM 1 0 5 IS ARROW LIST PROPERTIES AT FOREST.
THE SITE IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF WOOLWORTH AND FOREST STREETS AND HOUSTON CORPORATE LIMITS.
THE REASON FOR RELIGHT IS TO CREATE THREE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
STAFF ASKED THE APPLICANT WOULD HE CONSIDER A SHARED DRIVEWAY LAYOUT FOR THIS PLA.
THE APPLICANT RESPONDED THAT THE OWNER PREFERRED OF THE LAYOUT AS IS.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS PLAT.
THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
THE PLAT WAS DEFERRED AT THE LAST PLAN OF COMMISSION FOR FURTHER LEGAL REVIEW.
LEGAL HAS REVIEWED THE RESTRICTIONS AND THE PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
STAFF HAS RECEIVED ADVANCED COMMENTS CONCERNING DRAINAGE AND PARKING ISSUES.
WE REFER THE RESIDENTS OF DENVER HARBOR TO HOUSTON PUBLIC WORKS OCE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY GROUP AND THEY CONNECTED THE RESIDENTS TO STORMWATER OPERATIONS GROUP AND INDICATED THAT THIS PLAT WAS NOT IN A FLOOD PLAIN ZONE.
SO A DRAINAGE PLAN WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME, HOWEVER, BUT DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, THE OWNER WILL HAVE TO ADHERE TO ALL DRAINAGE AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
MR. CHAIR, IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
WE ARE CONTINUING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 1 0 5 ALA PROPERTIES AT FORCE.
UM, I HAVE TWO SPEAKERS THAT ARE SIGNED UP SO WE WILL BEGIN WITH, UH, GLORIA.
MS. AYALA IS MS. AYALA PRESENT OR ONLINE? ALRIGHT, WE'LL GO TO OUR NEXT SPEAKER, WHICH IS CAROLYN LOPEZ.
MS. LOPEZ, ARE YOU HERE PRESENT OR ONLINE? ALRIGHT, SEEING NONE IS THERE ANYONE HERE EITHER HERE AT PRESENT OR ONLINE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ITEM 1 0 5? ALRIGHT, HEARING NONE I WILL AGAIN CALL FOR MS. AYALA OR MS. LOPEZ.
UM, WITH THAT THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PUBLIC, UM, THE PLAT.
SO I WILL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING QUESTIONS.
COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF ON NUMBER 1 0 5.
IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION? CLARK, CLARK SECOND BALDWIN, BALDWIN.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO ITEM 1 0 6.
BY THE WAY, TODAY OF THE SCREEN, COULD YOU CHECK THE SCREEN IS OFF AGAIN? OKAY, THANK YOU.
ALRIGHT, UH, ITEM NUMBER 1 0 6 AURORA SECTION THREE, PARTIAL REPL NUMBER ONE ITEM 1 0 6 AURORA SECTION THREE, PARTIAL REPL NUMBER ONE, THE SITE IS LOCATED WEST ALONG FIRST BLUSH DRIVE NORTH OF AURORA GREENS WEST OF PEAK ROAD AND HOUSTON EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.
THE REASON FOR REPL IS TO REMOVE A 14 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE INTERIOR LOT LINES.
THE 14 UTILITY, 14 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT IS HIGHLIGHTED IN RED ON THE SCREEN.
AND IT WAS RECORDED IN, UH, 2000 AND, UH, 22.
THERE ARE NO VARIANTS REQUESTED WITH THIS PLAT.
THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS ITEM.
IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 1 0 6, AURORA SECTION THREE IS NOW OPEN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS ITEM?
[00:15:01]
HEARING NONE.THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON 1 0 6 AURORA SECTION THREE.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS FROM COMMISSION? IF NOT, IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? MOTION JONES.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO ITEM 1 0 7.
THE SITE IS LOCATED NORTH ALONG PUERTO RICO STREET NORTH OF GASNER ROAD AND HOUSTON'S CORPORATE LIMITS.
THE REASON FOR REPLY IS TO CREATE TWO NARROW FRONT LOADING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
STAFF ASKED THE APPLICANT WOULD HE CONSIDERED A SHARED DRIVEWAY LAYOUT FOR THIS PLAT.
THE APPLICANT RESPONDED THAT THE OWNER PREFERRED, UH, PREFERRED THIS, UH, LAYOUT.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS PLAT.
THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OF THOSE FILED SEPARATELY.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT PER THE CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
MR. CHAIR, IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION.
YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
AND WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY, UM, ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS ITEM.
SIR, CAN I HELP YOU? OH, OKAY.
IT'S BEEN RUNNING SO SMOOTHLY.
IT'S JUST, YOU KNOW, BUT IT'S BEEN AT LEAST A YEAR SINCE WE'VE SEEN YOU SO I'M GOOD.
SO, UM, SO LADIES AND GENTLEMEN WE'RE ON UH, NUMBER 1 0 7 CARVER DALE PLACE.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPENED.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ITEM 1 0 7 CARVER DALE? PLACE? NO ONE IN THE CHAT WITH THAT.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS.
AGAIN, ITEM 1 0 7 IS, ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COMMISSION? HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION? VICTOR CLARK.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
ITEM 1 0 8 IS CRAIG WOODS, PARTIALLY PLA NUMBER 38.
THE SITE IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF EARLY LANE AND FLOWERDALE STREETS AND HOUSTON CORPORATE LIMITS.
THE REASON FOR REPLY IS TO CREATE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
STAFF ASKED THE APPLICANT WOULD HE CONSIDER A SHARED DRIVEWAY AND HE INDICATED, UH, THE OWNER PREFERRED THIS LAYOUT BECAUSE OF THE DEED RESTRICTED BUILDING LINES.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS PLAT.
THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WOULD NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY.
STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS ITEM.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT PER THE CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
MR. CHAIR OF THE PLEASES COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 1 0 8, CRAIG WOODS IS NOW OPEN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE OR, UM, VIRTUALLY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? ALRIGHT, HEARING NONE THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, OTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT 1 0 8? CRAIG WOODS.
IS THERE A MOTION? ALL ALLMAN JONES? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
WHO WERE THE VOTES? THE VOTES WERE ALMAN AND JONES.
YOU DIDN'T THINK I WAS KEEPING NOTES? I AM
ALRIGHT, UM, WE'RE ONTO ITEM 1 0 9.
ITEM 1 0 9 IS ELMWOOD ESTATES.
THE SITE IS LOCATED SOUTH ALONG BURRIS STREET, WEST OF FULTON STREET IN HOUSTON.
THE REASON FOR RE PLAT IS TO CREATE THREE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NARROW, FRONT, NARROW FRONT LOADING LOTS.
STAFF ASKED THE APPLICANT WOULD HE CONSIDER SHARED DRIVEWAY LAYOUT FOR THIS PLAT.
THE APPLICANT RESPONDED THAT THE OWNER PREFERRED OF THIS LAYOUT THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS PLAT.
THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY.
STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS ITEM.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT PER THE CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
MR. CHAIR, IF YOUR PLEASES COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
UH, BEFORE I OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, I WANNA MAKE, UH, A VERBAL NOTE THAT COMMISSIONER PORES PER AS IN ATTENDANCE.
ALRIGHT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO AGAIN, UH, 1 0 9 ELMWOOD ESTATES.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE OR VIRTUALLY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? YES, I WOULD.
WOULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME AND SPELL YOUR LAST NAME PLEASE? YES.
[00:20:01]
IS IF IT'S A THREE FAMILY, UM, RESIDENTIAL BUILDING, UM, I'M CONCERNED ABOUT PARKING AND I'M CONCERNED ABOUT FLOODING IN THIS AREA.I LIVE, UH, ONE BLOCK AWAY OR ACTUALLY ONE HOUSE AWAY FROM WHERE THIS IS GONNA TAKE PLACE.
AND SO THE, THE, I GUESS I DON'T SEE IT 'CAUSE I'M NOT A BUILDER, BUT I SEE JUST HOW, HOW IS THE PARKING GONNA TAKE EFFECT THERE BECAUSE WE ALWAYS HAVE ISSUES THERE WITH THE FLOODING AND WE ALSO HAVE ISSUES THERE WITH PARKING.
ALRIGHT, MS. GARCIA, IS THAT THE END OF YOUR COMMENTS? WE'LL ADDRESS THE MOMENTARILY.
YE YES, THAT IS MY COMMENT AND OF COURSE, I MEAN, I, I DON'T UNDERSTAND.
SO THERE ISN'T ANY TYPE OF DEED RESTRICTIONS TO, TO ALLOW SOMEONE TO BUILD THIS TYPE OF BUILDING IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA? NO, APPARENTLY NOT.
WE, UH, LEGAL WILL ALWAYS LOOK INTO THAT AND THERE IS NOTHING THERE TO PREVENT THAT.
THIS DOES MEET ALL CHAPTER 42 REGULATIONS AND WHAT WE'RE DISCUSSING TODAY IS MERELY THE, THE PLAT, WHICH IS THE SPLITTING UP OF THE LOT INTO THREE INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES.
SO, BECAUSE THERE'S NOTHING THAT MEETS CHAPTER 42.
NOW AS FAR AS UH, DE RESTRICTIONS, THERE ARE NONE, UH, FOR US TO CONSIDER UNLESS YOU KNOW OF SOME THAT WE ARE UNAWARE OF.
THEY WILL HAVE TO, UH, ASK GET PERMITS AND ALL OF THAT WILL HAVE TO MEET, UH, RESTRICTIONS, WHICH IS NOT WHAT WE'RE DISCUSSING TODAY.
HOWEVER, ARE YOU ON COMPUTER BY PHONE? I'M ON COMPUTER.
UH, DO YOU HAVE ACCESS TO THE CHAT? YES.
IF YOU WOULD PUT YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION IN THERE, UM, WE'LL MAKE SURE SOMEONE FROM STAFF GETS IN TOUCH WITH YOU SO THEY CAN, UH, PUT YOU IN TOUCH WITH A DEVELOPER TO ANSWER ANY DIRECT QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.
UM, AS FAR AS PARKING IS CONCERNED, MS. FLM, I BELIEVE THAT EVERY UNIT HAS TO HAVE TWO PARKING SPACES.
TWO PARKING SPACES, TWO OFF STREET PARKING SPACES, TWO OFF STREET, UH, TWO OFF STREET, WHICH MEANS ON PROPERTY PARKING SPACES.
SO OSTENSIBLY THEY WILL NOT BE ADDING TO STREET PARKING, UH, BECAUSE THEY HAVE ENOUGH TWO CAR GARAGES I ASSUME.
UM, AND THEY, THEY'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE THAT AS WELL AS THE SETBACK THAT WOULD ALLOW ANOTHER CAR TO PARK IN FRONT OF THE GARAGE WITHOUT, UH, IMPEDING THE SIDEWALK.
THE BEST THING TO DO, MS. GARCIA OKAY, IS UH, AGAIN, PUT YOUR INFORMATION IN THE CHAT.
I'M SURE THAT STAFF WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS FOR YOU AND THEN IF, IF, UH, IF YOU LIKE, GET YOU IN TOUCH WITH THE DEVELOPER.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR CALLING.
IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ITEM 1 0 9? ELMWOOD ESTATES? SEEING NONE, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.
WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PLAT.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS? HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION? MODEST AND CLARK, I'M JUST MAD WITH POWER CHOOSING WHO MAKES A MOTION IN A SECOND? GO RIGHT AHEAD.
UH, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
ITEM ONE 10 IS FOSTER PLACE, PARTIALLY PLA NUMBER 33.
THE SITE IS LOCATED EAST ALONG ENGLAND STREET, WEST OF, WEST OF YELLOW, EAST OF ENGLAND, STREET AND HOUSTON.
THE REASON FOR RELA IS TO, THE REASON FOR RELA IS TO CREATE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM.
STAFF HAD ASKED THE APPLICANT WOULD HE CONSIDER A SHARED DRIVEWAY LAYOUT FOR THIS, A FOR THIS PLAT, AND THE APPLICANT RESPONDED, UH, THE OWNER PREFERRED THIS, UH, LAYOUT.
THERE ARE NO BEARING REQUESTED WITH THIS PLAT.
THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE PHASE OF PLAT.
ARE THOSE FILED SEPARATELY? STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS ITEM.
YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC, UM, HEARING FOR THIS ITEM.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO PROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CBC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN ON ITEM ONE 10.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE OR ONLINE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? HEARING NONE.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.
UH, COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT FOSTER PLACE? MR. CLARK? MINE'S JUST A, A TECHNICAL JUST FOR THE FILE.
UM, THE 1 0 1 FORM SAYS THAT IT UNDER CENTER POINT, IT SAYS THERE REASON FOR REPL TO CREATE FOUR, SPELLED OUT FOUR AND THEN IN PARENTHESES TWO.
SO JUST BEFORE YOU FILE THAT CORRECTED, I'D JUST LIKE TO HAVE THE FILE.
YEAH, UNFORTUNATELY THE, IT'S A MARKUP.
THE, THE APPLICANT PUT FOUR AND THE REASON FOR REPL, BUT HE'S ONLY CREATING TWO SINGLE FAMILY LINES.
ALRIGHT, THANK YOU LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? ALRIGHT, WITH THAT WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS LISTED ON ITEM ONE 10 FOSTER PLACE.
IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION FOR PERLE SECOND JONES.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED? HEARING NONE.
[00:25:01]
11.ITEM ONE 11 IS JULIN ESTATES REPL NUMBER ONE, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS ALONG JUTLAND STREET, SOUTH OF WEST BELFORD, EXCUSE ME, SOUTH OF BELFORD ROAD AND EAST OF CULLEN BOULEVARD.
THE PURPOSE OF THE RE PLAT IS TO CREATE 24 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND SEVEN RESERVES ALONG A SHARED DRIVEWAY.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLATTER.
THOSE FILED SEPARATELY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
MR. CHAIR, IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION.
YOU MAY OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME AND STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
WE'RE ON ITEM ONE 11 JUTLAND ESTATES.
UH, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
IS THERE ANYONE PRESENT WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? ALRIGHT THEN BEFORE WE, UH, WELL, UH, WITH THAT I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, BUT BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD, UM, I WANNA REMARK TO BOTH COMMISSIONERS AND PEOPLE WHO ARE IN ATTENDANCE.
YOU'VE HEARD MS. FLM TALK ABOUT, WE MADE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE DEVELOPER AND THEY SAID THANK YOU VERY MUCH, BUT NO THANK YOU.
SO MR. CRIDDLE, CAN YOU TALK TO COMMISSION AND THE, OUR ATTENDEES A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THIS PROPERTY, HOW IT CONVERTED FROM, YOU KNOW, DRIVES FACING THE STREET TO THE, TO THE, UH, LAYOUT THAT WE SEE TODAY? YES, SIR.
SO THE ORIGINAL PLAT WAS RECORDED, UH, A FEW YEARS AGO, UH, WITH LESS THAN HALF THE LOTS YOU SEE TODAY.
SO, UM, WHAT TOOK PLACE IN THIS CASE IS THERE'S A NEW DEVELOPER THAT CAME INTO PLAY AND WAS NOT, UM, SATISFIED WITH THIS, UH, FRONT LOADING LAYOUT.
SO, UM, THEY, THEY DID THEIR, ALL OF THEIR HOMEWORK AND CAME BACK TO US WITH A, WITH THE, THE SHARED DRIVEWAYS THAT YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN NOW.
SO IT WAS THE, THE DEVELOPER'S, UH, DECISION, UM, SINCE THE ORIGINAL PLAT WAS, WAS CREATED AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, UM, WE'VE GONE FROM THE ORIGINAL 14 LOTS TO 24 LOTS.
SO, UM, FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE DEVELOPERS IN OUR ATTENDANCE, WE WANNA MAKE SURE, UH, AND UH, COMMISSIONER CLARK AND I ON LIVABLE PLACES ARE TALKING ABOUT LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD SO THAT FRONT LOADERS ARE NOT REALLY YOUR ONLY OPTION.
YOU ACTUALLY HAVE MULTIPLE OPTIONS WHEN YOU'RE DOING THIS.
SO, UM, AGAIN, AS MS. FLM HAS BEEN SAYING THE ENTIRE MEETING, WE MADE A RECOMMENDATION IT WAS REFUSED BECAUSE THE LAYOUT MEETS CHAPTER 42.
BUT THIS GIVES MORE ACCESSIBILITY, POTENTIALLY ALLOWS FOR MORE HOUSING, IT'S STILL, UH, UNDER THE DENSITY REQUIREMENT AND, UM, POTENTIALLY COULD BE MORE AFFORDABLE.
SO AGAIN, FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE INTENSE, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR.
YEAH, I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING YOU SAID, OF COURSE FROM CO-CHAIR THE COMMITTEE, BUT THERE'S A DIFFERENCE IN THIS ONE.
I JUST WANT EVERYONE, EVEN ME TO UNDERSTAND WHEN WE'RE ASKING SOMEONE TO DO A SHARED DRIVE FOR TWO LOTS VERSUS A LARGER PARCEL, THAT'S A HUGE DIFFERENCE.
AND SO I KIND OF DON'T LIKE IT WHEN WE SAY THAT THEY REFUSE TO DO IT BECAUSE THERE'S REASONS THEY CAN'T DO IT.
AND IF THEY DO SEPARATE JUST TWO LOTS, IF YOU SIT DOWN AND YOU CIVIL ENGINEER IT OUT, YOU ACTUALLY LOSE A PARKING SPACE BECAUSE EVERY DRIVEWAY HAS TO HAVE TWO SPACES AND YOU TYPICALLY HAVE TWO IN YOUR GARAGE.
BUT WHEN YOU CURVE THAT DRIVEWAY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS AND THE IDM, YOU TAKE ONE OF THOSE PARKING SPACES 'CAUSE YOU'RE CURVING IT OUT.
SO I AGREE WHEN WE CAN DO SHARED DRIVEWAYS, IT'S A GREAT THING, BUT, UM, WE SHOULDN'T SAY PEOPLE REFUSE TO DO IT, EVEN IF THEY, THEY MAY REFUSE, BUT THEY, THEY'RE NOT, EVERYONE IS NOT REFUSING JUST TO REFUSE.
THERE, THERE ARE REASONS THAT THEY CAN'T DO IT.
SO JUST WANNA MAKE THAT CLARIFICATION.
THANK YOU SO MUCH, UHHUH,
ANY, ANY OTHER COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT THEN.
I'VE ALREADY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NUMBER ONE 11.
THANK YOU MR. CRILE FOR THAT PRESENTATION.
IF THERE ARE NO OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION CLARK SECOND.
ALL ALLMAN? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO ITEM ONE 12.
RICHMOND SENIOR VILLAGE, RICHMOND SENIOR VILLAGE.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS SOUTH OF RICHMOND AVENUE, WEST OF CHIMNEY ROCK ROAD ALONG BEVERLY HILLS STREET IN THE ST.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS RE PLAT IS CREATE ONE MULTIFAMILY RESERVE.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCES BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CCPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
MR. CHAIR, IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME AND STAFF HAS RECEIVED SUPPORT FROM THE TURS.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
WE'RE UH, DISCUSSING ITEM ONE 12 RICHMOND SENIOR VILLAGE.
[00:30:01]
NOW OPEN.I HAVE ONE INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNED TO SPEAK, STEADMAN RISBY.
HERE I REPRESENT THE DEVELOPER OWNER.
IF THERE IS NOBODY ELSE AND I KNOW IT'S BEEN FOR APPROVAL, I'M ALRIGHT.
UH, COMMISSIONERS, UH, ARE THERE, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS ITEM? ANYONE ONLINE? NO.
WITH THAT I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING UNLESS WE HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT WHO IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ALRIGHT, HEARING NONE THE PUBLIC HEARING AGAIN IS CLOSED.
UM, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS.
UM, IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL ON ITEM ONE 12 JONES JONES.
AYE MADS, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO ITEM ONE 13.
ITEM ONE 13 IS SOUTHLAND PLACE PARTIAL RELA NUMBER FOUR.
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN HOUSTON CITY LIMITS WEST ALONG BEHEAD STREET, SOUTH OF OST, OLD SPANISH TRAIL AND EAST OF STATE HIGHWAY 2 88.
THE PURPOSE OF THE REPLAY IS TO CREATE TWO NARROW FRONT LOADING SINGLE FAMILY LOTS.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCES BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THIS PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLATTER.
THOSE FILED SEPARATELY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
MR. CHAIR, IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME AND WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPENED ON ITEM ONE 13.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
IS THERE ANYONE PRESENT OR ONLINE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? HEARING NONE.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM ONE 13, SOUTHLAND PLACE.
WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT CONDITIONS.
IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION FOR PERLE SECOND ALLMAN ALLMAN.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
ITEM ONE 14 IS SPRING BRANCH ESTATES NUMBER TWO PARTIAL REPL NUMBER 17.
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CORPORATE LIMITS AT THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF BAUER DRIVE AND ALLEGRO STREET SOUTH OF HAMMERLY BOULEVARD AND EAST OF BAYLOCK ROAD.
THE PURPOSE OF THE RE PLAT IS TO CREATE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
THERE ARE NO BRANCHES REQUESTED FOR THIS ITEM AND THE PLAT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THE PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE ANY RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY.
WE RECEIVED NO ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS APPLICATION.
STAFF RECOMMENDS PROVING THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS MR. CHAIR FOR PLEASES THE COMMISSION.
YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM ONE 14 SPRING BRANCH ESTATES IS NOW OPEN.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? ALRIGHT, HEARING NONE THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.
COMMISSIONERS WERE ON ITEM ONE 14 SPRING BRANCH ESTATES WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PLAT.
IS THERE A MOTION? MAD SECOND CLARK.
WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO ITEM ONE 15.
ITEM ONE 15 IS TIMBERMAN ESTATES.
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CORPORATE LIMITS WEST ALONG HILL STREET SOUTH OF TWELL ROAD AND WEST OF MESA DRIVE.
THE PLAT WAS DEFERRED LAST CYCLE TO ALLOW APPLICANT TIME TO REVISE THEIR PLOT LAYOUT TO BETTER ASSIMILATE TO THE EXISTING D RESTRICTIONS ON THE SITE.
THE PURPOSE OF THE RE PLAT IS TO CREATE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUESTS FOR THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THE PLAT WILL NOT VIOLATE ANY RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILED SEPARATELY, WE HAVE RECEIVED NO ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS APPLICATION.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVING THE PLA SUBJECT TO CPC ONE ONE FORM CONDITIONS.
MR. CHAIR, IF IT PLEASE THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
WE'RE CONTINUING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM ONE 15.
TIM TIMMERMAN, IT STATES I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE OR ONLINE WHO WANTED TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? HEARING NONE.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PLAT SUBJECT CONDITIONS ON ITEM ONE 15.
IF THERE IS NO QUESTIONS, ARE NO QUESTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION CLARK SECOND JONES.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
ITEM ONE 16 IS TRINITY AT SPRING HILL.
[00:35:01]
LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON CORPORATE LIMITS AT SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF MOUNT PLEASANT STREET AND SPRING HILL STREET EAST OF STATE HIGHWAY 2 88 AND NORTH OF INTERSTATE 10.THE PURPOSE OF THE RE PLAT IS TO CREATE THREE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
REQUEST THIS ITEM AND THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL INDICATES THAT THE PLA WILL VIOLATE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OR THOSE FILES.
SEPARATELY, WE HAVE RECEIVED SOME ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THE PLAT CONCERNING SOLID WASTE PICKUP HEALTH AND SAFETY.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THE PLAT FOR TWO WEEKS PER APPLICANT REQUEST TO COORDINATE WITH LEGAL MR. CHAIR.
IF YOU PLEASES THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN ON ITEM ONE 16 TRINITY AT SPRINGHILL, I HAVE TWO PEOPLE WHO ARE ASSIGNED TO SPEAK AND THEY ARE IN ORDER.
DORIS ALEXANDER AND ANDREW FORD.
MS. ALEXANDER, ARE YOU PRESENT? MS. ALEXANDER STAR? SIX IF YOU'RE ON A TELEPHONE.
ALRIGHT, IS THERE SOMEONE THERE WANTING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? OKAY, I'M HERE.
ALRIGHT, MS. ALEXANDER, UM, GO RIGHT AHEAD.
I'M NOT AGAINST THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
I UNDERSTAND SEPARATING THE THREE PLOTS, UH, IS SEPARATING THE LOT IS A THREE PLOT, THREE PLOTS FOR IT TO BUILD THREE INDIVIDUAL HOMES.
BUT I AM AGAINST HIM AGAINST THE BUILDER.
UH, CHANGING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION HE'S BUILDING IN SOUTH UNION, THEREFORE HE NEEDS TO KEEP THE LEGAL SOUTH UNION WITH HIM.
UH, TRYING TO CHANGE THE LEGAL THAT WOULD, THAT GIVES OTHER DEVELOPERS THE CHANCE TO COME IN AND DO THE EXACT SAME BEING TAKEN AWAY THE HISTORY OF THE COMMUNITY OUT.
ALRIGHT, MS. ALEXANDER, IS THAT THE END OF YOUR COMMENTS? YES, THAT'S THE END OF MY COMMENTS.
ALRIGHT, UM, LET, UM, LET ME LET STAFF OR LEGAL ADDRESS THE ISSUE SO THAT YOU HAVE A, A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT, WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE NAME.
GOOD AFTERNOON PLANNING COMMISSION.
UM, TO, TO JUST UH, RE-ASK THIS QUESTION, ARE YOU WORRIED, IS THE SPEAKER ASKING TO KEEP THE NAME OF THE SUBDIVISION THE SAME? I BELIEVE SO.
SO JUST TO ANSWER THAT, CHANGING THE NAME OF THE SUBDIVISION WILL NOT CHANGE YOUR DEED RESTRICTIONS OR TAKE IT OUT OF THE SUBDIVISION.
IT IS STILL PART OF THE SAME SUBDIVISION.
THEY ARE VIDING IT TO CREATE THREE LOTS.
UM, THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OH.
TO, TO ALLOW FOR THIS TO HAPPEN BECAUSE IT CREATES A ISSUE WITH RECORDING OF THE PLAS IF THE NAME IS CARRIED OVER.
SO THE CURRENTLY IT MEETS THE ORDINANCE, IT IT, THEY CAN HAVE A DIFFERENT NAME.
IT DOES NOT TAKE IT OUT OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS OF THE ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION.
IT IT'S NOT THAT I JUST, OH, I'M SORRY.
AM I ABLE TO REPLY BACK? YES, PLEASE GO AHEAD.
SO MY, OKAY, SO FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN HE, WHEN WHAT HE'S DOING IS SAY FOR ONE BUILDING, SO WILL IT BE LOCK 37 BLOCK, UH, BLOCK THREE SECTION OF SOUTH UNION, LIKE ALL THE OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS IN THE AREA.
THIS IS JOHN CILLA WITH STAFF.
UH, I DID HAVE SOME, A CONVERSATION AT LENGTH WITH MR. ALEXANDER FORD ON THE PHONE.
IN REFERENCE TO THIS, IT WAS CONCERNED WHERE THIS IS SAYING, UH, THIS IS ACTUALLY OUT OF SOUTH UNION SECTION ONE, IT'S BLOCK 86, BUT WITH THE NEW PLAT LEGAL DESCRIPTION IT WOULD BE BLOCK ONE OF TRINITY AS SPRING HILL.
AND THERE WAS CONCERN THAT THAT INDICATION WOULD CHANGE THE BLOCK NUMBER FOR THE ENTIRETY OF THE BLOCK.
THAT IS JUST A LEGAL DESCRIPTION, UH, OR A DESCRIPTOR FOR THE NEW PLAT.
ONLY APPLICABLE TO JUST THIS LOT BEING RE PLATTED.
SO, UM, MR. ALEXANDER, IF IN THOSE CONCERNS IN THIS WILL NOT CHANGE ANY LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS FOR THE OTHER EXISTING PROPERTIES AROUND IT, IT'S MORE OF A, UH, A DESCRIPTOR DEFINING THAT THIS NEW SUBDIVISION WOULD HAVE THREE LOTS AND BE UNDER ONE BLOCK A AS A LABELING ASPECT.
MS. ALEXANDER, DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? UM, TECHNICALLY NOT REALLY.
IT'S MORE SO, UM, NO, IT'S NOT.
IT I, I I MEAN IT, IT REALLY ISN'T.
I JUST FEEL LIKE IT'S GONNA ALLOW OTHER DEVELOPERS TO COME IN AND DO THE SAME AND EVENTUALLY THIS JUST TAKE, YOU KNOW, IT JUST, IT IT'S A PART OF REC JUSTIFICATION AND I, YOU KNOW, AND THEN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD JUST LIKE MIDTOWN, A PART OF THIRD WARD, IT'S NOW MIDTOWN.
I JUST FEEL LIKE IT'LL TAKE OUR HISTORY AWAY FROM US BY ALLOWING THIS.
SO, ALRIGHT, SO MS. ALEXANDER, I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT'S THE ISSUE WITH SOUTH UNION?
[00:40:01]
YEAH, SO MS. ALEXANDER, I ACTUALLY, YOUR, YOUR QUESTION IS MORE THAN, THAN WE REALLY CAN HAVE THE TIME TO COVER HERE.UH, YOU ARE IN TOUCH WITH MR. CILLO, UM, OR WITH STAFF? IT'S, NO.
UM, ARE YOU ON PHONE OR COMPUTER? UH, I'M ON THE PHONE.
UM, I BELIEVE WE HAVE HER CONTACT INFORMATION.
SO, UM, HERE'S THE BEST THING THAT WE CAN DO, MS. ALEXANDER IS STAFF WILL BE HAPPY TO TALK TO YOU TO EXPLAIN WHAT'S HAPPENING AND IF THERE IS, AS YOU SAY, IF THERE'S FEAR THAT THIS COULD LEAD TO NEIGHBORHOOD CHANGES, THEY CAN GIVE YOU SOME IDEAS PERHAPS OF HOW YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO PRESERVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT REMAINS TO BE SEEN AT THIS POINT.
BUT THERE MIGHT BE OPTIONS FOR YOU.
SO IF YOU WOULD PUT YOUR INFORMA, YOU'RE ON THE PHONE, WE HAVE YOUR INFORMATION, WE'LL SEE THAT STAFF GETS IN TOUCH WITH YOU TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS AND IF NECESSARY PUT YOU IN TOUCH WITH THE DEVELOPER.
WE APPRECIATE YOUR CALLING IN.
ALRIGHT, OUR NEXT SPEAKER THANK YOU IS MR. UM, ANDREW FORD? YES.
I SPOKE WITH MR. SEDILLO EARLIER HERE ON THE PHONE.
UH, I HAD SOME OF THE SAME CONCERNS AS MS. ALEXANDER AND HE BRIEFLY KIND OF WENT OVER WHAT WAS GOING ON.
IT GAVE ME A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF IT, BUT, UH, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE FURTHER DISCUSSIONS AS WELL.
RIGHT, MR. FORD, I'M SURE WE CAN MAKE THAT HAPPEN.
THANK YOU SIR, VERY MUCH AGAIN, UM, WE APPRECIATE, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE WHO CALL IN TO TALK, TALK ABOUT THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD AND PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND SO I, I CAN ASSURE YOU STAFF LOOKS TOWARDS UM, HELPING NEIGHBORHOODS BASICALLY HELP THEMSELVES.
SO UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE HAPPY TO TALK TO YOU AND GIVE YOU WHATEVER ANSWERS WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO AFFORD YOU.
SO THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR CALL IN.
ALRIGHT, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS ITEM? WE'RE ON ITEM ONE 16 I BELIEVE, RIGHT? YES.
ALRIGHT, COMMISSIONERS QUESTIONS.
ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION ON ONE 16 TO DEFER AT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST AND TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
IF THERE ARE NO MORE SPEAKERS, HEARING NONE, IS THERE A MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING MOTION HINES HINES.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
THE MOTION PASSES THIS, UH, THIS ITEM IS UH, DEFERRED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO ITEM ONE 17.
MR. CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE CITY LOCATED EAST OF WALL DRIVE AND ALONG BELL STREET.
IT IS IN A STREET WITH EXCEPTION AREA.
THE PURPOSE OF THE REPL IS TO CREATE ONE UNRESTRICTED RESERVE.
REVIEW BY LEGAL HAS DETERMINED THAT THIS REQUEST DOES NOT VIOLATE DEED RESTRICTIONS.
THE APPLICANT HAS MET ALL THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
THERE ARE NO VARIANCES REQUESTED WITH THIS ITEM.
WE HAVE RECEIVED NO ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THIS PLAT.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CPC 1 0 1 CONDITIONS.
MR. CHAIR, IF IT PLEASE THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN ON ONE 17 WEST BELL FLATS.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS ITEM? NONE ONLINE AND NONE PRESENT WITHOUT.
I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
COMMISSIONERS ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ITEM? HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? MOTION ALLMAN ALLMAN.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
THE MOTION PASSES STAFF I WANNA JUST MAKE A NOTE SINCE I FORGOT THAT UH, COMMISSIONER TAHIR IS PRESENT.
UH, WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO ITEM ONE 18.
ITEM ONE 18 IS REN WOOD PARTIAL RELAID.
NUMBER FIVE, THE SIZE LOCATED IN THE HOUSTON GOME LIMITS EAST ALONG WYCLIFFE DRIVE WEST OF BRIMORE ROAD AND NORTH OF INTERSTATE 10.
THE PURPOSE OF THE RELA IS PLATTERS CREATE SEVEN NARROW FRONT LOADING SINGLE FAMILY LOTS.
THERE ARE NO VARIS OF REQUESTS WITH THIS ITEM AND THE PLAT HAS MET ALL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.
REVIEW BY LEGAL IS STILL UNDERGOING AND ADDITIONAL TIME IS REQUIRED TO ALLOW FOR PROPER REVIEW.
WE HAVE RECEIVED SOME ADVANCED COMMENTS FOR THE PLAT CONCERNING FOR TRAFFIC AND SAFETY.
PLAT RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THE PLAT FOR TWO WEEKS TO ALLOW FOR CONTINUED LEGAL REVIEW.
MR. CHAIR, IF YOU PLEASE THE COMMISSION, YOU MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME.
UH, WE ARE CONTINUING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM ONE 18.
REN WOOD PARTIAL REPL NUMBER FIVE.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE ONLINE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? ALRIGHT, COMMISSIONERS QUESTIONS.
ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO DEFER FOR FURTHER.
FOR FURTHER UM, REVIEW, UM, AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION PO PER SECOND
[00:45:01]
JONES? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
THIS ITEM IS DEFERRED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED.
THANK YOU LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.
ALRIGHT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO SECTION
[d. Subdivision Plats with Variance Requests (Aracely Rodriguez, Geoff Butler, and Devin Crittle)]
D VARIANCES.GOOD AFTERNOON MR. CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
MY NAME IS ELLI RODRIGUEZ AT ONE 19 INDIAN SPRING, SECTION ONE.
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN HOUSTON ETJ IN HARRIS COUNTY WEST OF LAKE HOUSTON AND EAST OF EAST LAKE HOUSTON PARKWAY.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH RESERVE RESTRICTED TO DRAINAGE WATER AND WASTEWATER PLANT ALONG THE SOUTHERN AREA.
THE APPLICANT IS ALSO REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO NOT EXTEND OR TERMINATE SILVER MOON TRAIL A LOCAL STREET WITH THE CULDESAC HIGHLIGHTED IN GREEN THE PROPOSED WEEK.
THE PROPOSED PLOT DOESN'T MEET ALL CHAPTER 42 STANDARDS AND ADDITIONAL TIME IF NEEDED TO FURTHER REVIEW THE VARI REQUEST.
SO STEP RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THE PLA FOR A SECOND TIME FOR CHAPTER 42 STANDARDS AND TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO COORDINATE WITH STAFF IN HARRIS COUNTY AND TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE REVISED INFORMATION BY NOON NEXT WEDNESDAY.
STAFF DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT IN EVENT AND THIS CONCLUDED MY PRESENTATION.
ALRIGHT LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM ONE 19 INDIAN SPRINGS SECTION ONE.
THERE IS UH, A RECOMMENDATION FOR DEFERRAL.
UH, ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 42 PLANNING STANDARDS.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? ALRIGHT, SEEING NONE, EXCUSE LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.
COMMISSIONS, DO WE HAVE QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT, HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION FOR DEFERRAL? BALDWIN SECOND ALLMAN ALMAN.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
WE'LL MOVE ON TO ONE 20 AT ONE 20.
LEGACY RANCH BUSINESS PARK GP THE SITE IS LOCATED IN HOUSTON ETJ IN HARRIS COUNTY, SOUTH OF US TWO 90 AND EAST OF MO.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANT TO EXCEED INTERSECTION FACING BUT NOT PROVIDING NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST WEST PUBLIC STREET THROUGH THE SIDE SOUTH OF MOUND ROAD.
THE REQUEST IN 2021 A GP WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE NORTHERN END GP AREA HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE AND A VARIANCE WAS GRANTED TO X TWO INTERSECTION FACING ALONG THE EASTERN WESTERN GP BOUNDARY AND SOUTH OF MOUNT ROAD.
THIS SECTION HAS BEEN PLOTTED AND APPROVED WITHOUT A STRICT CONNECTION SOUTH OF MOUNT ROAD.
NOW THE APPLICANT ACQUIRED ADDITIONAL LAND AND IS NOW PROPOSING TO EXPAND THE PROPERTY TO DEVELOP AN INDUSTRIAL SITE WITH WAREHOUSE AND LARGE DETENTION BASIN.
PER CHAPTER 42, THE APPLICANT REQUIRED TO DEDICATE NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST WEST PUBLISHED STREET THROUGH THE SIDE SOUTH OF MOUNT ROAD PROVIDING THIS STREET WILL CREATE AN TICAL DEVELOPMENT.
THIS REQUIRES STREET CANNOT BE EXTENDED FURTHER E OR NO OR NORTH.
DUE TO THE ASSISTING DEVELOPMENT AND PROPOSED DETENTION POND APPROVED WITH THE SECTION TO THE NORTH.
GRANTING OF THE VARIANT WILL STILL MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE.
THE GP DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE ADEQUATE BONUS AND ASSETS TO MAY 3RD, FIFTH AND PUBLISHED STREET AND TRAFFIC CIRCULATION WILL BE ADDRESSED BY THE EXISTING STREET PATTERN.
HARRIS COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT POSTED NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE GP SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITION.
STAFF DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT IN EVENT AND THEY CONCLUDE MY PRESENTATION.
THANK YOU LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM ONE 20, UH, LEGACY RANCH BUSINESS PARK GP.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WANTED TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS ITEM? ALRIGHT THEN COMMISSIONERS AGAIN WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCES AND APPROVE THE PLATS SUBSTITUTE CONDITIONS LISTED.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, HEARING NONE? IS THERE A MOTION? JONES JONES.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
[00:50:01]
ITEM 1 21 IS MEADOWS AT TAILGATE GP.THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE ETJ OF HARRIS COUNTY AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF GRANT ROAD AND TAILGATE ROAD.
THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST.
METALS AT TAILGATE IS A 50 ACRE GENERAL PLAN PLAN FOR BOTH RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USE SEPARATED BY A LARGE DETENTION RESERVE.
THE GENERAL PLAN HAS FRONTAGE ON MAJOR THOROUGHFARE GRANT ROAD AND WILL HAVE ITS VEHICULAR ACCESS ALONG MAJOR THOROUGHFARE TAILGATE ROAD.
STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES A PUBLIC STREET TO BE EXTENDED FROM TAILGATE ROAD TO THE WESTERN GP BOUNDARY.
LOCATED ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY IS THE LINCOLN SQUARE SUBDIVISION, WHICH REMAINS UNRECORDED.
TAKE ACCESS FROM PRIVATE STREETS CONNECTING TO GRANT ROAD TO THE NORTH.
SINCE PRIVATE STREETS CANNOT ADDRESS LOCAL INTERSECTION SPACING, IT WILL BE IMPRACTICAL TO REQUIRE THE PUBLIC STREET TO STUB INTO THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION.
THIS GP IS EXTENDING A PUBLIC STREET CONNECTION TO THE SOUTH BY WAY OF TAILGATE RANCH WEST GP.
ULTIMATELY THREE ACCESS POINTS ARE PROPOSED FOR THE 196 SINGLE FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT.
HARRIS COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HAS VOICED NO OBJECTION TO THIS REQUEST AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CPC 1 0 1 FORM CONDITIONS.
MR. MR. CHAIR, THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY ADVANCED COMMENTS.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM 1 21 MEADOWS AT TGI GP.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WANTED TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? THE APPLICANT IS HERE.
COMMISSIONERS QUESTIONS OF MR. FRANCE? THANK YOU SIR.
ALRIGHT, WELL HEARING NONE WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED ON ITEM 1 21.
IS THERE DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE.
IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION? CLARK CLARK SECOND MAIS.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
GOOD AFTERNOON MR. CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
ITEM 1 22 IS MORTON 180 TRACK GENERAL PLAN.
THIS ITEM WAS DEFERRED AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING.
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE WALL, EXCUSE ME, WALLER COUNTY ETJ BETWEEN CLAY AND MORTON ROADS WEST OF PITTS.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A GENERAL PLAN OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ALONG PUBLIC STREETS AND IS MAKING TWO REQUESTS, A VARIANCE TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY AND TWO, A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY.
STAFF HAS ALSO FOUND THAT THE APPLICANT MUST ADDRESS VARIANCES FOR NOT EXTENDING A SUB STREET FROM THE EAST TO NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED WIDENING TO A 30 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY AND TO LOCATE AN INTERSECTION ALONG MORTON THAT IS LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 600 FEET FROM THE NEAREST PUBLIC STREET.
STAFF RECOMMENDS A SECOND DEFERRAL FOR FURTHER STUDY AND REVIEW.
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN WALLER COUNTY ALONG A BLOCK MEASURING APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED THOROUGHFARES.
THIS BLOCK IS BISECTED BY TWO PUBLIC RIGHTS OF AWAY THAT WERE CREATED IN TWO SUBDIVISIONS TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT TRACT.
KATY PRAIRIE DRIVE IS A 30 FOOT UNIMPROVED RIGHT OF WAY ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY AND HALL THOMPSON ROAD IS AN IMPROVED PUBLIC STREET THAT TERMINATES AT THE EASTERN BOUNDARY.
THESE RIGHTS AWAY WERE IF THESE RIGHTS AWAY WERE IMPROVED AS REQUIRED, IT WOULD PROVIDE THE DEVELOPING AREA WITH THE MEANS FOR SAFE CIRCULATION AND ACCESS.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING VARIANCES TO NOT PROVIDE THESE IMPROVEMENTS AND WILL SUBMIT REVISED MATERIALS DURING THE DEFERRAL PERIOD.
STAFF RECOMMENDS DEFERRAL FOR FURTHER STUDY AND REVIEW.
WE'VE RECEIVED NO ADVANCE WRITTEN COMMENT IN THIS ITEM.
THIS CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION.
ALRIGHT LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM 1 22, MORTON 180 TRACK.
WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO DEFER FOR FURTHER STUDYING REVIEW.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? ALRIGHT, HEARING NONE AGAIN, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR DEFERRAL.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS? IF NONE, IS THERE A MOTION TO DEFER VICTOR? SECOND.
UM, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
[00:55:01]
ON TO THE NEXT ITEM WHICH IS SECTION F RECONSIDERATION OF REQUIREMENTS.WAIT, DID I MISS ONE? NO, THERE'S NOTHING IN SECTION E AND WE'RE MOVING ON
[f. Reconsiderations of Requirement (Geoff Butler)]
TO ITEM UH, 1 23 AND SECTION F RECONSIDERATION OF REQUIREMENTS.ITEM 1 41 IS HIGHLAND MEADOWS MOBILE HOME PARK.
WHAT HAPPENED TO 1 23? YOU SAID 1 41.
PREVIOUS THIS ITEM WAS DEFERRED PREVIOUSLY.
YOU KNOW, THEY PURPOSELY TRY AND MESS ME UP.
YOU KNOW THAT
ALRIGHT MR. BUTLER, GO AHEAD PLEASE.
ITEM 1 23 HIGHLAND MEADOWS HOME MOBILE HOME PARK SECTION ONE.
THIS ITEM WAS DEFERRED AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING.
THIS SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE HARRIS COUNTY ETJ, NORTH OF ALDEEN MALE ROUTE IN SOUTH OF LAU.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING RECONSIDERATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW FOR A CUL-DE-SAC WITH A 50 FOOT RADIUS AS OPPOSED TO THE REQUIRED 60 STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN HARRIS COUNTY WITHIN THE HIGHLAND MEADOWS MOBILE HOPE PARK GP.
THIS GENERAL PLAN WAS APPROVED WITH A VARIANCE TO EXCEED INTERSECTION SPACING BY NOT EXTENDING LAD BROOK LANE THROUGH THE SITE.
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A RESERVE AND IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A CUL-DE-SAC WITH A 60 FOOT RADIUS PER CHAPTER 42.
HOWEVER, SINCE THE SITE WILL BE USED FOR SEVEN MOBILE HOMES, THE DEMAND ON THE STREET SYSTEM WILL BE SIMILAR TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WHICH ALLOWS FOR A 50 FOOT RADIUS.
STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF CHAPTER 42 AS THE PROPOSED USE WILL HAVE A SIMILAR RESULT AS ENVISIONED BY THE ORDINANCE.
HARRIS COUNTY HAS EXPRESSED NO OBJECTION TO THIS APPLICATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDS GRANTING THE VARIANCE AND APPROVING THE PLAT FOR THE CC ONE ONE FORM CONDITIONS.
STAFF HAS RECEIVED NO ADVANCE WRITTEN COMMENT IN THIS ITEM.
THIS CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION.
ALRIGHT LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM 1 23 WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCES.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? NO.
ALRIGHT THEN AGAIN, UH, ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? COMMISSIONERS, IF NONE, IS THERE A MOTION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT MOTION? HINES HINES SECOND MAD.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
1 24 IS NEW KANEY, ISD PORTER ELEMENTARY.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE ETJ WITHIN MONTGOMERY COUNTY ALONG LOOP 4 94 SOUTH OF FORD AND EAST OF US.
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A RESERVE FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO EXCEED INTERSECTION FACING REQUIREMENTS ALONG MAJOR THOROUGHFARES BY NOT PROVIDING AN EAST TO WEST STREET, AS WELL AS A VARIANCE TO EXCEED LOCAL INTERSECTION SPACING.
BY NOT PROVIDING NORTH SOUTH STREET STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF BOTH REQUESTS.
THE SITE IS LOCATED ALONG HAMMOND AT THE INTERSECTION OF LOOP 4 94.
THE SCHOOL FEATURE ACCESS ALONG BOTH STREETS ALLOWING FOR TWO POINTS OF TRAFFIC DISPERSION.
THE SITE IS WITHIN A GRID SYSTEM, INCLUDING THESE STREETS AS WELL AS 59 AND FORD ROAD.
WHILE THESE EXISTING STREETS ARE SPACED FURTHER THAN WHAT IS ALLOWED UNDER CURRENT CODE THERE, THEY FORM A COMPLETE GRID AROUND THE SITE PROVIDING CIRCULATION AND ACCESS.
STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF CHAPTER 42 AS THE EXISTING STREET GRID SYSTEM PROVIDES FOR SAFE MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND VEHICLES.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY HAS EXPRESSED NO OBJECTION TO THIS REQUEST AND STAFF RECOMMENDS GRAINING THE VARIANCE AND APPROVING THE PLAT STAFF HAS RECEIVED NO ADVANCE WRITTEN COMMENT.
THIS ITEM, THIS CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON 1 24.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK ON THE SIDE OF, IS THERE ANYONE WHO WANTED TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON 1 24? ALRIGHT, HEARING NONE, WE'LL MOVE FORWARD.
WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS LISTED.
ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? IF NOT, IS THERE A MOTION? JONES SECOND ALLMAN, THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
ITEM 1 25 IS NORTH BRIDGELAND LAKE PARKWAY STREET DEDICATION, SECTION NINE.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE HARRIS COUNTY ETJ WEST OF THE GRAND PARKWAY AND SOUTH OF JACK ROAD.
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEDICATE A SEGMENT OF A PLANNED MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IN TWO LOCAL STREETS.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO CREATE A CURVE WITH A RADIUS LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 2000 FEET FOR MAJOR THOROUGHFARES.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST.
THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BRIDGELAND PRAIRIELAND VILLAGE GENERAL PLAN ALONG THE PROPOSED ROUTE OF NORTH BRIDGELAND LAKE PARKWAY, A DESIGNATED MAJOR THOROUGHFARE.
THE PROPOSED DEDICATION FOLLOWS THE ALIGNMENT SHOWN ON THE APPROVED GP AND THE CURRENT MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND FREEWAY PLAN.
THE EASTERN END OF THIS SEGMENT TERMINATES AT A PROPOSED SIGNALED INTERSECTION WITH FLYING ADMIRAL DRIVE.
COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STIPULATE THAT A LONGER TANGENT DISTANCE IS PROVIDED AT TRAFFIC SIGNALS TO ALLOW FOR A LONGER STRAIGHT ROADWAY APPROACHING INTERSECTIONS.
[01:00:01]
LONGER TANGENT REQUIREMENT, THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A TIGHTER CURVE RADIUS IN ORDER TO FOLLOW THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT.THIS HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN COORDINATION WITH HARRIS COUNTY WHO HAS REQUESTED THE REDUCED RADIUS.
STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST TO BE CONSISTENT WITH SOUND PUBLIC POLICY AS IT WILL ALLOW FOR THE STREET TO BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH HARRIS COUNTY REGULATIONS.
HARRIS COUNTY'S EXPRESSED SUPPORT FOR THIS APPLICATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDS GRANTING THE VARIANCE AND APPROVING THE PLAT.
PER THE CC ONE ONE FORM CONDITIONS.
STAFF HAS RECEIVED NO ADVANCED WRITTEN COMMENT.
THIS ITEM, THIS INCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE'RE ON ITEM 1 25, UH, NORTH BRIDGELAND LAKE PARKWAY STREET DEDICATION SECTION NINE.
WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AND APPROVE THE PLAT SUBJECT CONDITIONS LISTED.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? ALRIGHT, HEARING NONE IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS, IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? MOTION CLARK CLARK.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
[Platting Activities g - i]
G EXTENSIONS OF APPROVAL.MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
IF IT PLEASES THE COMMISSION, STAFF WOULD LIKE TO TAKE SECTIONS GH AND I AS ONE GROUP.
PLEASE DO SECTION G EXTENSIONS OF APPROVAL CONSISTS OF ITEMS 1 26 THROUGH 1 34.
SECTION H NAME CHANGES CONSISTS OF ITEMS 1 35 THROUGH 1 37 AND SECTION I CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CONSISTS OF ITEMS 1 38 THROUGH ONE 40.
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUESTS THE APPROVAL OF ALL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SECTIONS GH AND I.
THERE ARE NO ITEMS TAKEN OUT OF ORDER PER STAFF AND NO CHANGES IN RECOMMENDATION.
THANK YOU SO MUCH, COMMISSIONERS.
QUESTIONS, COMMENTS ON SECTIONS, G, H AND I.
I'M JUST WAITING 'CAUSE I CAN ALL RIGHT THEN.
IS THERE A MOTION? MOTION FOR AS PERLE? IS THERE A SECOND? ALLMAN ALLMAN.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED HEARING NONE.
THAT SECTION GH AND I WILL MOVE TO ITEM
[k. Development Plats with Variance Requests(Ramon Jaime-Leon)]
K DEVELOPMENT PLATS WITH VARIANCE REQUESTS.GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
MY NAME IS RAMON, ITEM 1 41 69 0 4 VAN EDEN STREET.
THIS, UH, SITE IS LOCATED NORTH OF OLD SPANISH TRAIL AND SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VAN EDEN STREET IN LOCKETT AVENUE.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE NOT TO PROVIDE A 28 FOOT PRIVATE STREET FOR A GARDEN STYLE APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER, TO ALLOW APPLICANT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, UH, REGARDING DEED RESTRICTIONS.
ALRIGHT, THANK YOU SO MUCH, SIR.
THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION, SIR.
ALRIGHT, BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD, I HAVE SEVERAL PEOPLE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK AND AGAIN, UH, REMINDING YOU THAT THE, UH, THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO DEFER THIS CORRECT, SIR? CORRECT.
AND THAT'S BASED ON DE RESTRICTIONS? YES.
I HAVE A NUMBER OF SPEAKERS, SO I'LL BEGIN BY JUST CALLING THE LIST.
THIS, THEY DO THAT BECAUSE I KNOW THEY DO IT PURPOSELY BECAUSE THEY CAN, I'M TELLING YOU THE MARTY, THE CHAIR GETS LARGER PRINT.
SO WE ARE GONNA GO TO, UH, BRIDGET.
RIGHT? ALRIGHT, WE'LL GO ON THE NEXT SPEAKER.
I COULD READ THIS WHEN I GOT HERE AND NOW I'M JUST TIRED AND WEARY.
SO THE NEXT SPEAKER IS NO, YOU DO IT.
JUST OUR, OUR FIRST SPEAKER WAS, YEAH.
OUR NEXT SPEAKER, KAREEM DADADA.
KAREEM, ARE YOU HERE? ALL RIGHT, WE'LL CALL AGAIN OUR NEXT SPEAKER.
THIS IS A TEST, RIGHT? NONE OF THESE PEOPLE ACTUALLY WANNA SPEAK.
IS THAT, ARE YOU MR. GONZALEZ? YES, I AM.
THE OTHER, UH, FOLKS MAY BE DELAYED BECAUSE OF, UH, THE TIMING RIGHT NOW.
UH, BUT LET ME GO AHEAD AND GO AHEAD.
[01:05:01]
PROPERTY.NUMBER TWO, IT'S A 69 0 4, UH, THIS SAME PROPERTY, UH, AND ALSO A DIRECTOR WITH THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION.
UH, THIS SAME PROPERTY WAS UP TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
CAN YOU HEAR ME? OKAY? THIS SAME PROPERTY WAS BROUGHT UP TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION THREE TIMES ALREADY.
AND OUR COMMU OUR COMMUNITY HAS EXPRESSED THE EXACT SAME CONCERNS.
UH, MULTIFAMILY, UH, FOURPLEX IN OUR IS NONCONFORMING TO OUR TOP DIVISION OF A SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
AND, UH, THIS HAS, YOU KNOW, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE 28 FOOT, UH, PRIVATE, UH, STREET BECAUSE THAT WAS WHAT THEY HAD BEFORE.
AND, BUT IT WAS STILL A FOURPLEX.
ANYWAY, UH, WE HAVE THREE DEVELOPMENTS IN OUR COMMUNITY AND THEY'RE ALL SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
SO AT THIS POINT IN TIME, WE DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY WE CAN'T GET TO THAT.
NOW, THE LAST TIME, AGAIN, THERE'S BEEN FOUR TIMES THAT WE HAVE BEEN TO THE COMMISSION ON THE SAME PROPERTY THE LAST TIME THE CITY OF HOUSTON ATTORNEY RECOMMENDED AGAINST THIS BECAUSE IT VIOLATED OUR DEED RESTRICTIONS.
SO WHAT HAS CHANGED? YOU KNOW, UH, IT'S LIKE SOMEONE IS PAYING TO PLAY, YOU KNOW, LIKE, KEEP GOING AT THIS.
UNTIL WE GET TIRED, WE'RE NOT GONNA GET TIRED ABOUT THIS.
EARLIER THIS YEAR, AND ACTUALLY IT'S A PROCESS THAT'S HAPPENED FOR LAST TWO YEARS.
UH, THE MAJORITY OF OUR RESIDENTS APPROVED OUR NEW HOME RESTRICTION.
UH, THE RESTRICTION, THERE WAS A, UH, A LOT OF EFFORT INTO THAT.
I HAVE TO SAY AGAIN, THE MAJORITY OF OUR COMMUNITY, CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, SIR.
THE MAJORITY OF OUR COMMUNITY, UH, OUR HOMES, ALL THE OWNERS HERE HAVE PARTICIPATED IN THIS PROCESS OVER A COUPLE YEARS.
AND I PERSONALLY MET WITH 23 OWNERS THAT, YOU KNOW, REDID OUR HOME RESTRICTIONS.
AND THE MAIN THING ON THAT WAS WE WANNA KEEP THIS A SINGLE FAMILY HOME.
OKAY? I'M NOT THE ONLY DIRECTOR.
OTHER DIRECTORS MET WITH MANY OTHER OWNERS AND THEY, THEY RECEIVED NOTARIZED COPIES THAT TO RENEW OUR NEW, OUR DI RE RESTRICTIONS.
OKAY? SO AGAIN, RE TIME REAFFIRMING.
THE MAJORITY OF OUR DIRECTORS HAVE, HAVE TALKED ABOUT NO MORE NO, NO MULTIFAMILY HOMES.
AND IF THAT'S NOT ENOUGH, IF WE'RE NOT HEARING TO OUR OWNERS, THERE'S A SAFETY ISSUE HERE THAT SOMEONE NEEDS TO THINK ABOUT THIS.
MR. GONZALEZ? I STILL HAVE TIME, RIGHT? OKAY.
I'M TAKING MR. VANGUARD'S TIME.
CHANDLER? NO, HE'S THE DIRECTOR.
ACTUALLY, YOU CAN'T, YOU, YOU CANNOT TAKE HIS TIME.
BUT I NEED YOU TO WRAP UP AND THEN WE'LL ASK FOR THE OTHERS TO SPEAK AS WELL.
DO YOU NEED 30 SECONDS? 30 SECONDS? DO YOU NEED TO WRAP UP, SIR? DO YOU NEED MORE? 30 SECONDS? NO, YOU NEED TO WRAP UP.
THE WRAP UP IS THAT THE CITY OF HOUSTON HAS PUT NO PARKING SIGNS.
THEY CLOSED OUT ONE LANE IN FRONT OF THIS HOUSE SO THAT WE CAN REDUCE TRAFFIC.
AND NOW WE'RE TRYING TO DO MULTI-FAMILY HOMES, WHICH WILL CREATE AN EVEN BIGGER, UH, TRAFFIC HAZARD TO OUR COMMUNITY.
SO, UH, ALSO WOULD LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT WE HAVE SUBMITTED NUMEROUS COMMENTS FROM OTHER RESIDENTS.
SO LEMME CALL THE OTHER SPEAKERS.
SO NOT AGREE WITH DEFERRING MR. EZ.
WE DON'T NOT AGREE WITH DEFERRING.
THIS SHOULD BE TERMINATED, YOU KNOW.
IT A SINGLE YES, MR. GONZALEZ.
MR. GONZALEZ, YOUR TIME IS UP.
THIS ITEM IS BEING REQUESTED FOR DEFERRAL.
YOU WILL HAVE ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
UM, AND I'M GONNA ASK LEGAL AFTER OUR SPEAKERS TO GIVE YOU AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHERE THE CITY IS TODAY.
TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION ABOUT THEIR REAPPLYING, THERE'S NOTHING THAT THE CITY CAN DO WHEN SOMEONE APPLIES.
UM, SO THEY'RE FREE TO APPLY AS MANY TIMES AS THEY LIKE, BUT AS YOU SAID, DEED RESTRICTIONS ARE IN PLACE, UM, THAT HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED.
AND SO I CAN ASSURE YOU THE CITY IS LOOKING AT THAT SERIOUSLY.
SO LET ME LET OTHER, I'M LET, LET ME CALL ON THE OTHER SPEAKERS AT THIS POINT, SIR.
THE LAST TIME THAT WE DID THIS, MR. GONZALEZ.
MR. GONZALEZ, YOUR TIME IS UP.
YOU WILL HAVE ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
ALRIGHT, IS THERE ANYONE HERE OR ON ONLINE? OKAY.
WHO, UH, WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS ITEM? 1 41 VAN ETTEN ROAD.
UH, I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST TO CHANGE FROM DEFERRED TO OPPOSE AND REJECT.
UH, THIS HAS BEEN REVIEWED A NUMBER OF TIMES UNDER THIS COMMISSION.
UH, IT DOES TAKE A LOT OF TIME FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
[01:10:01]
TO EXPLAIN THIS OVER AND OVER AGAIN.UH, THERE WERE A LOT OF COMMENTS THAT WERE SUBMITTED.
I PLEASE, UH, ASK THAT TAKE TO CONSIDERATION AND CHANGE THIS RECOMMENDATION FROM DEFERRED TO DENY AND REJECT.
OUR NEXT SPEAKER, THE NEXT SPEAKER IS MEGAN RYAN, RYAN.
MS. RYAN, ARE YOU THERE? YES, I AM.
I'M A RESIDENT AT 6 9 2 2 VAN ETTEN.
AND I WOULD LIKE THE COMMISSION TO REVIEW ALL OF THE PUBLIC COMMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE PAST FOUR INSTANCES.
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN UP BEFORE YOU TO KNOW THAT THERE IS OPPOSITION TO THIS BASED ON DEED RESTRICTIONS.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROMPT CONCLUSION OF THIS VARIANCE REQUEST AND DENYING IT.
ANY OTHER SPEAKERS? YES, WE HAVE DANIEL GOLDBERG, G-O-L-D-B-E-R-G.
MR. GOLDBERG, ARE YOU THERE, MR. GOLDBERG? ALRIGHT.
UM, YOU NEED TO START SIX OR ON YOUR COMPUTER? UNMUTE.
ALL RIGHT, MR. GOLDBERG, WE'RE GONNA WAIT FOR YOU, BUT, UH, ARE THERE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS, ANY OTHER PEOPLE WHO ARE, UH, WANTING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS ITEM? YES, UH, MY NAME'S BENE.
UM, CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? YES, SIR.
YES, WE HAVE YOU GO AHEAD, SIR.
UM, I WANT TO, YOU KNOW, TALK ABOUT THIS ITEM 1 41 AND I WOULD LIKE TO, UH, YOU KNOW, REQUEST THE COMMISSION TO DENY, UH, YOU KNOW, UH, VARIOUS REQUESTS.
UM, OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS ALMOST 80 YEARS OLD AND IT CONSISTS ONLY OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND CONSTRUCTION OF A FOURPLEX WILL NOT BE CONSTANT WITH THE CHARACTER OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND I'M ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT THE, HOW THIS MULTIFAMILY WILL NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE VALUE OF OUR PROPERTIES IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, RESULTING IN LOWER REVENUES FOR CITY OF HOUSTON.
UH, I'M ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THE, WHEN THEY ARE REQUESTING, I THINK IT'LL, UH, CREATE MORE PARKING ON THE STREET AND, UH, THAT WILL CREATE MORE TRAFFIC IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ALSO OBSTRUCTION TO THE PEDESTRIANS.
AND, UH, UM, I ALSO THINK IT'LL CREATE DISTURBANCE FOR FIRE TRUCKS COMING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPERTY.
THEREFORE, I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THE COMMISSION TO DENY A, YOU KNOW, THIS, UH, REQUEST FOR VARIANCE.
IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WANTED TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? MR. GOLDBERG IS NOW AVAILABLE.
MR. GOLDBERG, ARE YOU THERE? YES.
YOU TELL ME IF YOU CAN HEAR ME NOW GO.
YOU'VE HEARD ABOUT SEVERAL DIFFERENT REASONS THAT MULTIPLE NEIGHBORS OF OURS ARE OPPOSED TO THIS.
I'M THE CENTRAL ASSOCIATION, CENTRAL CIVIC ASSOCIATION'S PRESIDENT.
I'M HERE TO BRING UP SOMETHING ELSE BEYOND DE RESTRICTIONS, BEYOND PARKING, UM, AND BEYOND THE IMPACT UPON, UH, TRAFFIC, WE HAVE OURSELVES A VERY SMALL AND INCREDIBLY DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS AFFORDABLE.
PROPERTIES ARE BETWEEN 300,000 TO 1 MILLION.
THIS CITY HAS IDENTIFIED A VERY KEY PROBLEM THAT MID-LEVEL, MID INCOME PROPERTIES ARE SCARCE.
THERE'S EITHER HIGH-END STUFF OR THERE'S LOW-END STUFF.
AND HERE WE HAVE A PROPERTY, A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT'S BOTH DIVERSE IN TERMS OF ETHNICITIES, RELIGIONS, SOCIOECONOMIC BACKGROUNDS, AND IT'S AFFORDABLE.
HERE WE HAVE IN YOUR COMMISSION, THERE'S A SUBCOMMITTEE CALLED LIVABLE PLACES ACTION COMMITTEE THAT IS COMMITTED QUOTE TO PRESERVING GREAT NEIGHBORHOODS.
BRINGING IN AN APARTMENT COMPLEX ON INTO THIS NEIGHBORHOOD WILL DESTROY THAT BECAUSE THIS PROPERTY WILL NOT BE THE ONLY ONE WHERE AN APARTMENT COMPLEX WILL BE BUILT IF THIS VARIANCE REQUEST IS ALLOWED, WHICH IS PERMITTED.
OTHERS, OTHER DEVELOPERS ARE EYEING THIS ONE AND THEY WILL FOLLOW SUIT.
THE ONE OF THE KEY GOALS IS DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCY.
IE OFFERING VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES, CATERING TO VARI VARIETY OF INCOME LEVELS.
THAT'S ONE OF THE GOALS OF THE LIVABLE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION COMMITTEE.
WELL, WE GOT THAT ON OVER HERE, BUT TAKING AWAY SEVERAL OF THESE PROPERTIES, STARTING OFF WITH THIS ONE WOULD RESULT IN LESS THAN THAT.
WE HAVE ANOTHER GOAL IN PHIL HOUSING, MORE AFFORDABLE, MISSING MIDDLE HOUSING.
WE'VE ALREADY DISCUSSED THAT ONE.
WE HAVE OURSELVES A GREAT LITTLE PLACE.
WE ARE MOVING TO GET NEW DEED RESTRICTIONS.
WE'VE WORKED VERY HARD ON THAT WITH THE EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS.
YOU HAVE PROBLEMS GALORE, UH, IF YOU BRING ON IN AN APARTMENT COMPLEX THAT JUST ISN'T WANTED ON OVER THERE.
[01:15:01]
YOU'VE HEARD COMPLAINTS ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPER IN TERMS OF REPOSTING THIS SAME REQUEST SEVERAL TIMES OVER.HIS TRACK RECORD IN THIS PROPERTY IS REALLY BAD.
YOU CAN LOOK AT THE 3 1 1 PUBLICLY AVAILABLE NOTICES THAT HAVE BEEN POSTED ON THIS PROPERTY FOR ALLOWING TIRES, A STACK OF TIRES TO BE PILED UP, GRASS OVERGROWN, BUSTED WINDOWS.
IF THIS IS THE OWNER, THEN HE'S NOT OFF TO A VERY GOOD TRACK RECORD ON OVER HERE.
I REALLY HOPE THAT THE COMMITTEE TAKES A LOOK, COMPARES IT TO ITS OWN GOALS, ESPECIALLY THOSE, THE LIVABLE ACTION, UM, NEIGHBOR, UH, LIVABLE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION COMMITTEE AND THEN DENIES THIS VARIANCE REQUEST.
FINALLY, I REALLY APPRECIATE GUYS LISTENING TO US ALL AND GENERALLY WHAT YOU DO AND HEARING ALL THESE COMMENTS OF PEOPLE THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WANTING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS ITEM? ALRIGHT, FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE HERE PRESENT AND HAVE, UH, TAKEN THE TIME OUT OF YOUR DAY TO CALL IN, UM, I'VE REQUESTED LEGAL TO HAVE A COMMENT FOR YOU OF THE CITY'S CURRENT STANCE ON, UM, THIS ITEM, MS. MICKELSON.
UM, AS THE SPEAKERS HAVE NOTICED, THIS ITEM HAS COME BEFORE YOU MULTIPLE TIMES.
UM, I MAY HAVE ONLY BEEN HERE FOR THE LAST ONE, BUT, UM, THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT'S STANCE HAS NOT CHANGED.
IT'S OUR VIEW THAT THIS DOES VIOLATE DEED RESTRICTIONS AND WE RECOMMENDED DISAPPROVAL THAT I BELIEVE WAS COMMUNICATED TO THE APPLICANT, UM, EARLIER.
I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS YESTERDAY OR TODAY, BUT UM, I HAVE ALREADY RECEIVED A COMMENT BACK, AN EMAIL BACK FROM THEIR ATTORNEY.
SO I KNOW THEY ARE IN DISAGREEMENT.
THE CITY OF HOUSTON, IN REVIEWING, UM, DEED RESTRICTIONS DOES NOT ADJUDICATE.
THESE WE'RE, WE'RE NOT THERE TO, WE'RE, WE'RE NOT A JUDGE.
SO WHEN, WHEN LEGAL DEED RESTRICTIONS ARE REVIEWED, IT'S SIMPLY WITH AN EYE, IS THERE ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE NEIGHBORHOODS CLAIM THAT THESE, THAT THESE APPLY IF THE APPLICANT GETS A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTION OR SOME SORT OF OTHER COURT ORDER SAYING THESE RESTRICTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO HIS PROPERTY, THAT'S SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
BUT YOU MAY RECALL THE FIRST TIME THIS, WELL, THE LAST TIME THIS CAME, IT WAS MR. GOLDBERG, I BELIEVE, EITHER ON BEHALF OF OR AS PRESIDENT OF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, WHO BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION THE RENEWAL OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS.
AND AGAIN, WE'VE INTERPRETED THAT AS APPLYING TO, AS BEING VALID AND APPLYING TO THE ENTIRETY OF THE SUBDIVISION.
UM, SO, UM, IN SHORT, WHAT IS BASICALLY HAPPENING HERE IS THE APPLICANT HAS ASKED FOR A DEFERRAL BASED ON, UM, THEY KNOW THE OUTCOME BASED ON OUR LEGAL ADVICE.
SO THEY HAVE PERSONALLY ASKED FOR A DEFERRAL.
BUT AT THIS POINT IN TIME, UM, IT IS UP TO US TO EITHER DEFER IT OR APPROVE IT OR DENY IT.
BUT AT THIS POINT IN TIME, UM, LEGAL IS SAYING, UM, NO, AND THE CLIENT IS ASKING FOR DEFERRAL.
SO COMMISSIONERS, UM, THIS IS UP TO YOU AGAIN, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF PER THE APPLICANT FOR A DEFERRAL.
UM, ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? NO, I HAVE A COMMENT.
UM, WELL FIRST I'D LIKE TO COMMENT.
ONE OF THE SPEAKERS ASKED US TO REVIEW ALL THE COMMENTS THAT WERE SUBMITTED AND I JUST WANNA REASSURE HER THAT WE DO REVIEW THEM.
YOU GUYS DON'T SEE US FLIPPING THROUGH PAPER 'CAUSE THEY'RE ALL ON OUR IPAD.
HE ALWAYS HAS PAPER, BUT, UM, I READ 'EM ON MY IPAD PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
I BROWSE THROUGH THEM AS WE'RE LOOKING AT EACH INDIVIDUAL ITEM AND I'M SURE THAT THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS DO THE SAME THING.
SO I JUST WANT YOU GUYS TO KNOW, I KNOW THE TIME YOU TAKE AND THE WORK THAT YOU DO TO COME AND, UH, SPEAK TO US EITHER IN PERSON OR, OR VIRTUALLY.
WE DO LOOK AT THAT AND WE DO, WE DO LISTEN TO YOU.
HOWEVER, APPLICANTS DO HAVE THE ABILITY TO KEEP APPLYING UNTIL THEY RUN OUT OF THE TIME TO APPLY.
AND SO THEY HAVE ONE MORE DEFERRAL.
UM, AND IT DOES COST THEM MONEY IF THEY, YOU KNOW, COME BACK ANOTHER TIME.
IF WE DIS DISAPPROVE THIS COMPLETELY AND THEY COME BACK AGAIN, WE CAN'T STOP THEM FROM COMING BACK.
IT DOES COST THEM TIME AND MONEY NOT ONLY WITH, YOU KNOW, SUBMITTING FEES, BUT ALSO WITH THEIR CONSULTANTS AND SUCH.
BUT WE CAN'T STOP THEM FROM SUBMITTING.
UM, I ALSO, YOU KNOW, IF THEY'VE ASKED FOR A DEFERRAL, I KNOW PEOPLE HATE TO COME BACK, BUT IF THEY HAVE SOMETHING THAT THEY CAN SHOW THAT, UM, GOES AGAINST WHAT WE'VE FOUND, THEN I THINK THAT WE SHOULD GIVE THEM THAT ABILITY TO, TO COME BACK AND, AND, YOU KNOW, SUBMIT WHAT THEY HAVE.
SO I'LL MAKE THAT RECOMMENDATION AND WAIT FOR EVERYONE ELSE TO SPEAK.
THANK YOU COMMISSIONER COMMERS.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON ITEM 1 41? UM, I HAVE A QUESTION.
UH, SO MR. MAREZ WAS THE INITIAL RECOMMENDATION TO DENY BEFORE THEY CAME BACK WITH A RESPONSE EARLIER TODAY? UM, I'M NOT CERTAIN WHAT STAFF'S ORIGINAL RECOMMENDATION WAS, BUT ONCE I THINK THAT WE ADVISED THEM OF THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT'S POSITION ON THE DEED RESTRICTIONS, THEN I THINK IT WAS TO DENY.
[01:20:01]
AGAIN, AS HAS BEEN STATED, IT WAS JUST THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO DEFER.AND AGAIN, COMMISSIONER, WE'VE SEEN THIS MULTIPLE TIMES NOW, AS, AS, AS THE, UH, SPEAKERS HAVE SAID, I THINK THIS IS THE THIRD TIME OR FOURTH TIME THAT WE'VE SEEN THIS AND IT CONTINUES TO CHANGE A LITTLE BIT.
BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, UM, LEGAL HAS FOUND THAT IT'S STILL IN VIOLATION OF, OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD DEED RESTRICTIONS.
SO I, I UNDERSTAND THE APPLICANT PERHAPS REQUESTING A DEFERRAL, BUT HAS, HAD THERE BEEN ANY DRAMATIC CHANGES, I GUESS FROM THE PREVIOUS TIME WE DID DENIED? I, I GET YOUR, YOUR, YOUR COMMENTS COMMISSIONER CLARK, BUT IF, IF THEY'RE, THEY'RE NOT DRASTICALLY CHANGING THEIR APPLICATIONS AND IT'S JUST, I, I GUESS I'M NOT SURE WHY WE WOULDN'T DENY IT OR WELL, DIRECTOR WALLACE BROWN, WAIT ONE SECOND.
DIRECTOR WALLACE BROWN, I I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE YOU'RE, WE'RE CLEAR ON THIS, THAT WHAT THE APPLICATION IS FOR IS FOR THE VARIANCE, NOT FOR THE, NOT FOR THE RIGHT, NOT FOR WHETHER IT'S GOING TO BE A FOURPLEX OR NOT.
IT'S FOR THE VARIANCE OF WHICH IS THE DRIVEWAY WIDTH.
RIGHT, RIGHT NOW, NOW THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT HAS DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE ITSELF VIOLATES THE DEED RESTRICTION.
SO WE'RE, THERE'S REALLY TWO THINGS GOING ON RIGHT NOW.
THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT'S MADE A DETERMINATION ABOUT THE I, THE THE ITEM, THE, THE STRUCTURE.
BUT YET THE APPLICANT IS ACTUALLY ASKING FOR A DRIVEWAY VARIANCE ONLY.
SO THAT'S WHAT, THAT'S WHAT YOUR DECISION'S GONNA BE BASED ON.
SO WE COULD GIVE THEM THE VARIANCE
UH, I, I THINK A COUPLE OF THINGS A STAFF RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO DENY.
HOWEVER, BECAUSE THE APPLICANT REQUESTED OF A DEFERRAL, WE'VE, WE'VE, WE SORT OF WERE TRYING TO HONOR IT.
HOWEVER, COMMISSION HAS ALWAYS ASKED US WHAT IS, WHAT IS IT THE STAFF GOING TO ACCO ACCOMPLISH IN TWO WEEKS? I THINK IF YOU ARE ASKING THAT QUESTION, THAT IS A VALID QUESTION.
I DON'T KNOW IF STAFF HAS THAT ANSWER.
I I DO NOT KNOW WHAT WE ARE GOING TO ACCOMPLISH IN TWO WEEKS.
SO IN PAST YOU'VE ASKED THAT QUESTION, I SUGGEST THAT WE ASK THAT QUESTION TO THE, TO THE APPLICANT, WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO IN TWO WEEKS AND THEN PROBABLY COME BACK TO YOU ALONG THOSE LINES.
WHAT WOULD A 28 FOOT DRIVE LOOK LIKE AT THIS PROPERTY? I MEAN, HOW WOULD IT WORK? I WAS CURIOUS ABOUT THAT EARLIER, BUT I, I THINK THAT IS A GOOD QUESTION, BUT, UH, THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.
UM, BEFORE WE ANSWER THAT, I I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT THIS IS CLARIFIED.
THAT STAFF'S OPINION WILL NOT BE DIFFERENT THAN LEGAL REVIEW.
IF LEGAL REVIEW CAME BACK FOR ANY PROJECT THAT IT VIOLATES THE RESTRICTIONS, ESPECIALLY IN THIS CASE WHERE IT'S A SITE PLAN REVIEW AND THE VARIANCE IS VERY MUCH ASSOCIATED WITH THE RESTRICTIONS.
THE REASON THE VARIANCE IS BEING ASKED IS BECAUSE THEY'RE CONVERTING SINGLE FAMILY TO MULTI-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY RULES APPLY.
SO THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION WILL BE TO DENY NEXT TIME OR IF THEY REQUEST A DEFERRAL, WE'LL COME BACK TO YOU.
SO A 28 FOOT DRIVE WOULD LOOK LIKE SOMETHING LIKE THAT JUST TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION.
BUT I JUST WANTED YOU TO KNOW THAT WE WILL NOT COME BACK TO SUPPORTIVE AVOIDANCE FOR WHICH LEGAL HAS REVIEWED AND SAID THAT THEY DO.
THEY VIOLATE THESE RESTRICTIONS.
ALRIGHT, COMMISSIONERS, QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? WELL, I, I'VE HAD A COMMENT, COMMISSIONER.
UM, I WAS JUST GONNA EXPLAIN, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY HAVE TO COME BACK WITH IN TWO WEEKS, BUT THEY SHOULD HAVE THE ABILITY TO COME BACK.
WHEN DID THEY FIND OUT THAT DEED RESTRICTIONS WERE BEING VIOLATED? A WHILE AGO.
WELL THAT, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN TO ME? TWO DAYS AGO, TWO WEEKS AGO, A MONTH AGO, SIX WEEKS AGO? NO, I THINK LEGAL WITH THE LAST APPLICATION, THEY WERE ADVISED THAT IT VIOLATED DEED RESTRICTIONS AT THAT TIME.
THE APPLICANT'S ATTORNEY PROTESTED THAT, SENT US A LETTER SAYING WE, THIS IS WHY WE DON'T THINK IT APPLIES AGAIN IN OUR REVIEW.
WE DON'T ADJUDICATE THAT OR DECIDE.
SO I'M JUST TRYING TO GET THE TIMELINE STRAIGHT BECAUSE NOT VALUE, BUT YEAH.
YEAH, WE DO, WE DO ALWAYS ASK WHEN STAFF RECOMMENDS TO DEFER, WE ALWAYS ASK STAFF WHAT THEY'RE GONNA BRING BACK.
I DON'T REMEMBER ASKING A, A CLIENT WHAT THEY'RE GONNA DO BECAUSE THEY HAVE THAT ABILITY TO DO IT.
AND AGAIN, YOU KNOW, I'M NOT FIGHTING FOR THIS APPLICATION.
IF IT DOESN'T MEET DEED RESTRICTIONS, IT DOESN'T MEET DEED RESTRICTIONS.
I'M JUST TRYING TO ABIDE BY THE ABILITY OF WHAT CHAPTER 42 AND OUR RULES ALLOW AND OUR RULES ALLOW THAT THEY GET ONE MORE TRY.
ALRIGHT, COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER COMMENTS? ALRIGHT, NO QUESTIONS OF STAFF.
ALRIGHT, SO AGAIN, WE'RE ON ITEM 1 41 6 9 0 4 VAN ETTEN ROAD.
UH, THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A DEFERRAL.
SO THE QUESTION IS, LADIES AND
[01:25:01]
GENTLEMEN, UM, DO YOU CHOOSE TO DEFER? ALRIGHT, MOTION.I'LL SAY ALLMAN SECOND BY CLARK FOR A DEFERRAL.
ALRIGHT, UH, AGAIN, AS WE'RE GONNA BE DEFERRING, DO WE HAVE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS OF STAFF OF SOMETHING WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE IN TWO WEEKS? UH, BECAUSE AT THIS POINT I DON'T THINK MS. MAAR IS GOING TO PRESENT ANYTHING NEW IN TWO WEEKS.
THIS IS JUST PROCEDURAL PROCEDURALLY WE WON'T DO IT FOREVER FOR APPLICANT REQUEST.
MS. MICKELSON, I THINK WHAT IS LIKELY TO HAPPEN IS THAT THE ATTORNEY FOR THE DEVELOPER WILL ASK TO SIT DOWN WITH OUR DEED RESTRICTION ATTORNEY, MS. BOYD, AND DISCUSS THE ITEM.
HE MAY BE ABLE TO CONVINCE HER HE MAY NOT.
SO DISCUSSIONS ARE, I, I THINK IT'S A DISCUSSION AMONG LEGAL FOR THE NEXT, OKAY.
SO AGAIN, LADIES AND DOUBLE, WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR A DEFERRAL.
UH, IF THERE'S NO MORE DISCUSSION, IS THERE A MOTION? NO, WE HAVE, OH, WE HAVE ONE.
SO NO ONE'S CHANGED YOUR MIND.
UH, ALLMAN AND CLARK, APOLOGIES.
ALLMAN AND CLARK, WE HAVE UH, A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR A DEFERRAL.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED BY NAME PLEASE? MODEST BALDWIN.
MODEST IN BALDWIN OR NO? SO THE MOTION PASSES.
THIS ITEM IS DEFERRED FOR TWO WEEKS.
[IV. Establish a public hearing date of December 1, 2022]
ON TO SECTION.ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF DECEMBER 1ST, 2022 FOR BLAYLOCK SQUARE.
NUMBER TWO, COZY MED ENCLAVE ON MANOR ENCLAVE ON NOEL ESTATES AT RANDOLPH STREET.
RELA NUMBER ONE LANGHAM CREEK COLONY.
NUMBER FOUR, POTOMAC ESTATES STEEPLECHASE.
SECTION ONE, PARTIAL REPL NUMBER THREE, AND THE VILLAS ON STEARNS.
IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FOR PERLE? SECOND MADIS? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED THE MOTION PASSES.
WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO SECTION FIVE, PUBLIC COMMENT.
I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED TO SPEAK.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE, UH, TO THE COMMISSION DURING PUBLIC COMMENT? HEARING NONE.
WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER SIX.
IS THERE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? MOTION CLARK VICTOR? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED? HEARING NONE.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.